Nevada 2017 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 453 — Establishes conditional plea agreements in criminal cases. (BDR 14-1065)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 237.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 27, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

108 added · 123 removed

108 line(s) added, 123 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 24, 2017) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
453 A SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
453–Assemblyman Yeager CHAPTER..........
453–ASSEMBLYMAN YEAGER M ARCH 27, 2017 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Establishes conditional plea agreements in criminal cases.
(BDR 14-1065) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law sets forth the types of pleas and the procedure for entering pleas in criminal proceedings.
criminal proceedings.
(NRS 174.035) This bill establishes the procedure for a defendant and the district attorney to enter into a written conditional plea agreement.
(NRS 174.035) This bill establishes the procedure for apleas in defendant and the district attorney to enter into a written conditional plea agreement.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Section 1.
Sections 1 and 2.
2.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
- *AB453_R1* – 2 – 2.
2.
A defendant who has entered a plea of guilty but mentally ill has the burden of establishing the defendant’s mental illness by a preponderance of the evidence.
A defendant who has entered a plea of guilty but mentally ill has the burden of - 79th Session (2017) – 2 – establishing the defendant’s mental illness by a preponderance of the evidence.
Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, a defendant who enters such a plea is subject to the same criminal, civil and administrative penalties and procedures as a defendant who pleads guilty.
Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, a defendant who enters such a plea is subject to the same criminal, civil and administrative penalties and procedures as a defendant who ple[5.] 6.ltyThe defendant may, in the alternative or in addition to any one of the pleas permitted by subsection 1, plead not guilty by reason of insanity.
[5.] 6.
The defendant may, in the alternative or in addition to any one of the pleas permitted by subsection 1, plead not guilty by reason of insanity.
- *AB453_R1* – 3 – [7.] 8.
[7.] 8.
or (b) The maximum prison sentence is more than 10 years, ¬ unless the plea bargain is set forth in writing and signed by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, if the defendant is represented by counsel, and the prosecuting attorney.
or (b) The maximum prison sentence is more than 10 years, defendant, the defendant’s attorney, if the defendant is represented by counsel, and the prosecuting attorney.
(b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.
- 79th Session (2017) – 3 – (b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.
(b) The defendant has established by a preponderance of the evidence that due to a disease or defect of the mind, the defendant was mentally ill at the time of the commission of the offense;
(b) The defendant has established by a preponderance of the evidence that due to a disease or defect of the mind, the defendant was(c) The defendant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity pursuant to subsection [5] 6 of NRS 174.035.
and (c) The defendant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity pursuant to subsection [5] 6 of NRS 174.035.
- *AB453_R1* – 4 – 4.
4.
defect which is caused solely by voluntary intoxication.a disease or (b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.
(a) “Disease or defect of the mind” does not include a disease or defect which is caused solely by voluntary intoxication.
H - *AB453_R1*
(b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.
~~~~~ 17 - 79th Session (2017)
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 237.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  5. Read second time.

  6. Placed on Second Reading File.

  7. From committee: Do pass.

  8. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  9. In Senate.

  10. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  11. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint .

  12. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 420.) To printer.

  13. Placed on Second Reading File.

  14. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  15. From printer. To committee.

  16. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 453?
AB 453 is sponsored by Yeager, Steve (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 453?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 27, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 453?
Track AB 453 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 453

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 453

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →