Revises provisions concerning the withdrawal of certain pleas. (BDR 3-286)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 184 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 184.
You're tracking AB 184
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 184 — Revises provisions concerning the withdrawal of certain pleas. (BDR 3-286)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 85.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
75 added · 85 removed75 line(s) added, 85 removed.
A.B.Assembly Bill No.
184184–Assemblyman AOhrenschall SSEMBLYCHAPTER.......... B ILLN O.
184–ASSEMBLYMAN OHRENSCHALL PREFILED F EBRUARY 13, 2017 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions concerning the withdrawal of certain pleas.
(BDR 3-286) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law authorizes a person convicted of a crime and under sentence of death or imprisonment to file a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the conviction or sentence as having been obtained or imposed in violation of state law or a constitutional right.
Existing law provides that, with the exception of a direct appeal or a remedy which is incident to the proceedings in the trial court, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus replaces all other common law, statutory or other remedies which have been available for challenging the validityw,validity of the conviction or sentence and must be used exclusively in place of them.
(NRS 34.724) Existing law also authorizes a criminal defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere at any time before sentencing, and also permits the withdrawal of such a plea after sentencing, but only to correct a manifest injustice.
(NRS 176.165)176.165)ch a plea after sentencing, but only to correct a In 2000, the Nevada Supreme Court held that a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea to correct a manifest injustice was a remedy incident to the proceedings in the trial court.
558 (2000)) The Nevada Supreme Court, however, recently reversed the holding of that case, instead holding that a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus provides the exclusive remedy for a challenge to the validityvalidityor a of a guilty plea made after sentencing for persons in custody on the conviction beiThisbeing billchallenged. expressly provides that a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere pursuant to NRS 176.165 that is made after - *AB184* – 2 – sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended is a remedy which is incident to the proceedings in the trial court under certain circumstances.
(Harris v.
State, 130 Nev.
Adv.
Op.
47, 329 P.3d 619 (2014)) This bill expressly provides that a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere pursuant to NRS 176.165 that is made after sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended is a remedy which is incident to the proceedings in the trial court under certain circumstances.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Any person convicted of a crime and under sentence of death or imprisonment who claims that the conviction was obtained, or that the sentence was imposed, in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution or laws of this State, or who claims that the time the person has served pursuant to the judgment of conviction has been improperly computed, may, without paying a filing fee, file a postconviction petition for a writ - 79th Session (2017) – 2 – of habeas corpus to obtain relief from the conviction or sentence or to challenge the computation of time that the person has served.
(c) Is the only remedy available to an incarcerated person to challenge the computation of time that the person has servedservedn to pursuant to a judgment of conviction.
A motion filed more than 5 years after the date on which the person - *AB184* – 3 – was convicted creates a rebuttable presumption of prejudice to the State on the basis of laches.
This act applies to any motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere pursuant to NRS 176.165 that is made after sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended that is pending on or after June 12, 2014.
H~~~~~ 17 - *AB184*79th Session (2017)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 85.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 12, Nays: 8, Excused: 1.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 39, Nays: 1, Excused: 2.) To Senate.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
-
Prefiled pursuant to JSR 14.2.1(d).
Sponsors
- James Ohrenschall · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ohrenschall, James Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 184?
- AB 184 is sponsored by Ohrenschall, James (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 184?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 184?
- Track AB 184 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 184
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 184
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →