Financial institutions; authorize to delay a transaction upon good-faith belief that eligible person will b...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2202 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2202.
You're tracking SB 2202
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2202 — Financial institutions; authorize to delay a transaction upon good-faith belief that eligible person will be exploited.
Last action — Died On Calendar
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
27 added · 24 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to SB 2202 adjust the maximum time a financial institution can delay a transaction suspected of exploiting an eligible person from fifteen days to ten days. Additionally, the new version clarifies that law enforcement or the Department of Human Services can extend the delay for another ten business days if needed. This reduction in the initial delay duration and the clearer protocol for extensions aim to better balance the protection of vulnerable individuals with the efficiency of financial transactions. Overall, it enhances the ability to quickly address potential exploitation while ensuring proper oversight.
SB2202 (As(COMMITTEE Introduced)SUBSTITUTE) - 2020 Regular Session MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE Regular Session To:
Senator(s) Caughman Senate Bill 2202 (COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE) AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO DELAY THE COMPLETION OF A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION, IF THE INSTITUTION BELIEVES IN GOOD FAITH THAT A REQUESTED TRANSACTION MAY RESULT IN, OR BE THE RESULT OF, EXPLOITATION OF AN ELIGIBLE PERSON;
(2) If an officer of a financial institution or a branch manager believes in good faith that a requested transaction of any kind may result in, or be the result of, exploitation of an eligible person, the institution may delay the completion or execution of the transaction for a period of time not to exceed fifteenten (15)(10) business days, unless extended,extended as otherwise provided in this section.
or (b) FifteenTen (15)(10) business days, unless the Department of Human Services or a law enforcement authority requests that the bank extend the delay, in which case the delay shall be extended for an additional period of up to ten (10) business days unless otherwise extended or terminated by court order. The Department of Human Services, any law enforcement authority or any interested person may petition a court of competent jurisdiction to enter an order extending or terminating the delay of a transaction.
(4) If a transaction is delayed, the financial institution shall promptly notify the Department of Human Services, and at its option may notify any federal, state or local law enforcement authority, any other person who is authorized to have access to or transact business on any account of the eligible person with the financial institution, any person reasonably associated with the eligible person, or any other person permitted by state or federal laws or regulations or by customer agreement. If an officer of the financial institution suspects exploitation, the financial institution must notify a federal, state or local law enforcement agency within forty-eight (48) hours. The financial institution may disclose in connection with such notification information about the transaction, the reason for the delay, and any information that may be included in a report of abuse, neglect or exploitation as provided in Section 43-47-7.
View plain text versions (2)
- Current version View text Current html
- Introduced As Introduced html
Action History
-
Died On Calendar
-
Title Suff Do Pass Comm Sub
-
Referred To Judiciary, Division A
Sponsors
- Caughman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 174 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Caughman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (174)
174 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 174 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 2202?
- SB 2202 is sponsored by Caughman.
- What is the current status of SB 2202?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2202?
- Track SB 2202 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2202
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2202
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →