CIV PRO-AD REVIEW PARTY ZONING
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 29 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 29.
You're tracking SB 29
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 29 — CIV PRO-AD REVIEW PARTY ZONING
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0321
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2007. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Administrative Review Law in the Code of Civil Procedure to provide that, in an administrative review of a decision of a hearing officer or a county zoning board of appeals, the only necessary parties are the hearing officer or the county zoning board of appeals and the applicant to the hearing officer or the county zoning board of appeals. Provides that a notice of the filing of the administrative review action and information about the administrative review process, including the method to intervene, must be sent by certified mail to each person who appeared before and submitted oral testimony or written statements to the hearing officer or the zoning board of appeals. Effective July 1, 2007.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
4 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill SB 29 includes the addition of new lines, which likely contain updated provisions or clarifications that weren't present in the earlier version. These changes can help ensure the bill is more effective and addresses any concerns raised during the earlier review process. Understanding these modifications is important as they could impact how the bill functions in practice and the outcomes it aims to achieve.
SB0029 EngrossedEnrolled LRB095 03431 AJO 23435 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
No action for administrative review SB0029 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB095 03431 AJO 23435 b shall be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based upon the failure to name an administrative agency, board, committee, or government entity, where the director or agency head, in his or her official capacity, has been named as a defendant as provided in this Section.
The notice shall state the caption of the SB0029 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB095 03431 AJO 23435 b action, the court in which the action is filed, and the names of the plaintiff in the action and the applicant to the zoning board of appeals.
Each person who appeared before and submitted oral testimony or written statements to the hearing SB0029 EngrossedEnrolled - 4 - LRB095 03431 AJO 23435 b officer or the zoning board of appeals with respect to the decision appealed from shall have a right to intervene as a defendant in the action upon application made to the court within 30 days of the mailing of the notice.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0321
-
Effective Date August 21, 2007
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 113-003-000
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert W. Pritchard
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Local Government Committee; 009-000-000
-
Assigned to Local Government Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Jim Sacia
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading February 23, 2007
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading February 22, 2007
-
Do Pass Local Government; 010-000-000
-
Assigned to Local Government
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Todd Sieben
Sponsors
- Todd Sieben · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Todd Sieben
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 101 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 113 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 3% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Graham | — | Not Voting |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Nay |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Nay |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Nay |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 29 do?
- Amends the Administrative Review Law in the Code of Civil Procedure to provide that, in an administrative review of a decision of a hearing officer or a county zoning board of appeals, the only necessary parties are the hearing officer or the county zoning board of appeals and the applicant to the hearing officer or the county zoning board of appeals. Provides that a notice of the filing of the administrative review action and information about the administrative review process, including the method to intervene, must be sent by certified mail to each person who appeared before and submitted oral testimony or written statements to the hearing officer or the zoning board of appeals. Effective July 1, 2007.
- Who sponsors SB 29?
- SB 29 is sponsored by Todd Sieben.
- What is the current status of SB 29?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2007. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 29?
- Track SB 29 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 29
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 29
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →