CANNABIS CONTROL-FORFEITURE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2198 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2198.
You're tracking SB 2198
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2198 — CANNABIS CONTROL-FORFEITURE
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0989
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2008. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Cannabis Control Act. Provides that real property is subject to forfeiture if it is used or intended to be used to facilitate the possession, distribution, sale, receipt, or concealment of specified property that constitutes a felony violation of the Act or that is the proceeds of any felony violation of the Act. Provides that if the State's Attorney is of the opinion that real property is subject to forfeiture under the Act, forfeiture proceedings shall be instituted in accordance with the Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act. Provides that the exemptions from forfeiture provisions of that Act are applicable. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
145 added · 144 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of Bill SB 2198, a specific threshold was added that applies to property seizures related to violations involving cannabis. Now, only properties linked to violations involving more than 2,000 grams of cannabis are subject to forfeiture, while the previous version did not specify a quantity. This change is important because it clarifies the criteria for seizure, potentially protecting individuals from losing property for lesser offenses and ensuring that enforcement is focused on more significant cases of illegal activity.
SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
(i) no conveyance used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as a common carrier is subject to forfeiture under this Section SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b unless it appears that the owner or other person in charge of the conveyance is a consenting party or privy to a violation of this Act;
(6) all real property, including any right, title, and interest including, but not limited to, any leasehold interest or the beneficial interest to a land trust, in the whole of any lot or tract of land and any appurtenances or improvements, that is used or intended to be used to SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b facilitate the manufacture, distribution, sale, receipt, or concealment of property described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection (a) that constitutes a felony violation of thismore Actthan 2,000 grams of a substance containing cannabis or that is the proceeds of any felony violation of this Act.
(c) In the event of seizure pursuant to subsection (b), forfeiture proceedings shall be instituted in accordance with SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled - 4 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b forfeiture proceedings shall be instituted in accordance with the Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act.
(4) remove the property to a storage area for safekeeping or, if the property is a negotiable instrument or money and is not needed for evidentiary purposes, SB2198 Enrolled - 5 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b deposit it in an interest bearing account;
SB2198 Engrossed - 5 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b (5) place the property under constructive seizure by posting notice of pending forfeiture on it, by giving notice of pending forfeiture to its owners and interest holders, or by filing notice of pending forfeiture in any appropriate public record relating to the property;
However, upon the application of the seizing agency or prosecutor who was responsible for the investigation, arrest or arrests and prosecution which lead to the forfeiture, the Director may return any item of forfeited property to the seizing agency or prosecutor for official use in the enforcement of laws relating to cannabis or controlled substances, if the agency or prosecutor can demonstrate that SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled - 6 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b substances, if the agency or prosecutor can demonstrate that the item requested would be useful to the agency or prosecutor in their enforcement efforts.
Amounts distributed to the agency or agencies shall be used for the enforcement of laws SB2198 EngrossedEnrolled - 7 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b agencies shall be used for the enforcement of laws governing cannabis and controlled substances or for security cameras used for the prevention or detection of violence, except that amounts distributed to the Secretary of State shall be deposited into the Secretary of State Evidence Fund to be used as provided in Section 2-115 of the Illinois Vehicle Code.
(ii) 12.5% shall be distributed to the Office of the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor and deposited in the Narcotics Profit Forfeiture Fund of that Office to be used for additional expenses incurred in the investigation, prosecution and appeal of cases arising SB2198 Enrolled - 8 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b under laws governing cannabis and controlled substances.
SB2198 Engrossed - 8 - LRB095 15662 RLC 41667 b The Office of the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor shall not receive distribution from cases brought in counties with over 3,000,000 population.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0989
-
Effective Date October 3, 2008
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs 042-000-000
-
3/5 Vote Required
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Judiciary Criminal Law; 010-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 01-July 10, 2008
-
Approved for Consideration Rules
-
Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Rules
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. William Delgado
-
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 01-May 31, 2008
-
Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 01
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000
-
Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Dennis M. Reboletti
-
Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Removed Rep. Dennis M. Reboletti
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 012-001-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Dennis M. Reboletti
-
Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) May 31, 2008
-
Committee Deadline Extended-Rule 9(b) May 23, 2008
-
Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Martin A. Sandoval
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Susana A Mendoza
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 051-000-000
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Dan Kotowski
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 1, 2008
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 13, 2008
-
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary Criminal Law; 006-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. William Delgado
-
Assigned to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. William Delgado
Sponsors
- William Delgado · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- William Delgado
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Noland | — | Not Voting |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Not Voting |
| Munoz | — | Not Voting |
| Cullerton | — | Not Voting |
| Jacobs | — | Not Voting |
| Meeks | — | Not Voting |
| Silverstein | — | Not Voting |
| Viverito | — | Not Voting |
| Dahl | — | Not Voting |
| Frerichs | — | Not Voting |
| Haine | — | Not Voting |
| Halvorson | — | Not Voting |
| Hendon | — | Not Voting |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Steans | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Not Voting |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Not Voting |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bivins | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Not Voting |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 101 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 114 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Not Voting |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Not Voting |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Steans | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Not Voting |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Not Voting |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Not Voting |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Not Voting |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Not Voting |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Bivins | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Not Voting |
| Bond | — | Not Voting |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2198 do?
- Amends the Cannabis Control Act. Provides that real property is subject to forfeiture if it is used or intended to be used to facilitate the possession, distribution, sale, receipt, or concealment of specified property that constitutes a felony violation of the Act or that is the proceeds of any felony violation of the Act. Provides that if the State's Attorney is of the opinion that real property is subject to forfeiture under the Act, forfeiture proceedings shall be instituted in accordance with the Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act. Provides that the exemptions from forfeiture provisions of that Act are applicable. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors SB 2198?
- SB 2198 is sponsored by William Delgado.
- What is the current status of SB 2198?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2008. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 2198?
- Track SB 2198 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2198
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2198
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →