CRIM PRO-INTEGRATED BALLIS ID
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1290 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1290.
You're tracking HB 1290
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1290 — CRIM PRO-INTEGRATED BALLIS ID
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
Died in session
This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that a defendant may make a motion before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case for the performance of Integrated Ballistic Identification System testing on evidence that was secured in relation to the trial which resulted in his or her conviction, but which was not subject to the testing which is now requested because the technology for the testing was not available at the time of trial.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
41 added · 44 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill HB 1290 now allows defendants to request additional testing on evidence that was not tested during their trial, either because the necessary technology wasn’t available at that time or because the evidence can now be tested with improved scientific methods. This change is significant because it opens the door for potentially new evidence to be considered, which could impact the fairness of convictions and help ensure justice is served. Additionally, the amendment requires defendants to demonstrate that the identity of the accused was an issue during the trial and that the evidence has been properly maintained. This ensures that only reliable evidence is re-examined, protecting the integrity of the legal process.
*LRB09510445RLC30660b* HB1290 95THEngrossed GENERALLRB095 ASSEMBLY10445 StateRLC of30660 Illinoisb andAN 2008ACT HB1290concerning Introducedcriminal 2/20/2007,law. by Rep.
Arthur L.
Turner SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 5/116-3 Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.
Provides that a defendant may make a motion before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case for the performance of Integrated Ballistic Identification System testing on evidence that was secured in relation to the trial which resulted in his or her conviction, but which was not subject to the testing which is now requested because the technology for the testing was not available at the time of trial.
LRB095 10445 RLC 30660 b A BILL FOR HB1290 LRB095 10445 RLC 30660 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
(a) A defendant may make a motion before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case for the performance of fingerprint, Integrated Ballistic Identification System, or forensic DNA testing, including comparison analysis of genetic marker groupings of the evidence collected by criminal justice agencies pursuant to the alleged offense, to those of the defendant, to those of other forensic evidence, and to those maintained under subsection (f) of Section 5-4-3 of the Unified Code of Corrections, on evidence that was secured in relation to the trial which resulted in his or her conviction, butand: which was not subject to the testing which is now requested because the technology for the testing was not available at the time of trial.
(1) but which was not subject to the testing which is now requested because the technology for the testing was not available at the time of trial;
or.
Reasonable notice HB1290 Engrossed - 2 - LRB095 10445 RLC 30660 b of the motion shall be served upon the State.
(2) although previously subjected to testing, can be subjected to additional testing utilizing a method that was not scientifically available at the time of trial that provides a reasonable likelihood of more probative results.
HB1290 - 2 - LRB095 10445 RLC 30660 b (b) The defendant must present a prima facie case that:
HB1290 Engrossed - 3 - LRB095 10445 RLC 30660 b (d) If evidence previously tested pursuant to this Section reveals an unknown fingerprint from the crime scene that does not match the defendant or the victim, the order of the Court shall direct the prosecuting authority to request the Illinois State Police Bureau of Forensic Science to submit the unknown fingerprint evidence into the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AIFIS) for identification.
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 22, 2008; Substantive House Bills Out of Committee
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading April 24, 2007
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 112-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Careen M Gordon
-
Remove Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Careen M Gordon
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert S. Molaro
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Annazette Collins
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Esther Golar
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Elga L. Jefferies
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jim Sacia
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Careen M Gordon
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 013-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Arthur L. Turner
Sponsors
- Arthur L. Turner · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Arthur L. Turner
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 99 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 112 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Not Voting |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Not Voting |
| Froehlich | — | Not Voting |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Not Voting |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Not Voting |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1290 do?
- Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that a defendant may make a motion before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case for the performance of Integrated Ballistic Identification System testing on evidence that was secured in relation to the trial which resulted in his or her conviction, but which was not subject to the testing which is now requested because the technology for the testing was not available at the time of trial.
- Who sponsors HB 1290?
- HB 1290 is sponsored by Arthur L. Turner.
- What is the current status of HB 1290?
- This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1290?
- Track HB 1290 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1290
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1290
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →