Illinois 95th Regular Session Status: Passed House

HB 4220 — DISSOL-VIRTUAL CHILD VISITATON

Last action — Session Sine Die

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides for reasonable visitation between a child and a non-custodial parent through electronic communication such as telephone, e-mail, instant messaging, and other modes of electronic communication. Provides that the court may not use time spent in electronic communication to affect child support, custody, visitation, or removal of a child from the State. Provides for the custodial parent to provide any new e-mail address of the child to the noncustodial parent within 24 hours of the change. Makes other changes concerning electronic communication between a parent and a child and between a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling and a child.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

87 added · 59 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 4220 clarifies that the Governor and their agencies do not have the authority to create rules for implementing this bill on their own. Instead, if the Governor sees a need for rules, they can suggest them to the General Assembly, which must then approve any new rules through legislation. This change is significant because it strengthens legislative control over the rulemaking process, ensuring that any regulations are established with direct oversight from elected representatives rather than executive authority.

→
Previous
Latest
*LRB09515333AJO41321b* HB4220 95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2008 HB4220 by Rep.
HB4220 Engrossed LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
Ruth Munson SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 5/607 from Ch.
40, par.
607 ILCS 5/609 from Ch.
40, par.
609 Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.
Provides for reasonable visitation between a child and a non-custodial parent through electronic communication such as telephone, e-mail, instant messaging, and other modes of electronic communication.
Provides that the court may not use time spent in electronic communication to affect child support, custody, visitation, or removal of a child from the State.
Provides for the custodial parent to provide any new e-mail address of the child to the noncustodial parent within 24 hours of the change.
Makes other changes concerning electronic communication between a parent and a child and between a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling and a child.
LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b A BILL FOR HB4220 LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
(2) "Electronic communication" means time that a HB4220 - 2 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b parent spends with his or her child during which the child is not in the parent’s actual physical custody, but which is facilitated by the use of communication tools such as the telephone, electronic mail, instant messaging, video conferencing or other wired or wireless technologies via the Internet, or another medium of communication.
(2) "Electronic communication" means time that a HB4220 Engrossed - 2 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b parent spends with his or her child during which the child is not in the parent’s actual physical custody, but which is facilitated by the use of communication tools such as the telephone, electronic mail, instant messaging, video conferencing or other wired or wireless technologies via the Internet, or another medium of communication.
(a-5)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (a-5), any grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling may file HB4220 - 3 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b a petition for visitation rights to a minor child if there is an unreasonable denial of visitation by a parent and at least one of the following conditions exists:
(a-5)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (a-5), any grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling may file HB4220 Engrossed - 3 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b a petition for visitation rights to a minor child if there is an unreasonable denial of visitation by a parent and at least one of the following conditions exists:
HB4220 - 4 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b (C) (Blank);
HB4220 Engrossed - 4 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b (C) (Blank);
The burden is on the party filing a petition under this Section to prove that the parent’s HB4220 - 5 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b actions and decisions regarding visitation times are harmful to the child’s mental, physical, or emotional health.
The burden is on the party filing a petition under this Section to prove that the parent’s HB4220 Engrossed - 5 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b actions and decisions regarding visitation times are harmful to the child’s mental, physical, or emotional health.
(J) any other fact that establishes that the loss of the relationship between the petitioner and the child is HB4220 - 6 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b likely to harm the child’s mental, physical, or emotional health;
(J) any other fact that establishes that the loss of the relationship between the petitioner and the child is HB4220 Engrossed - 6 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b likely to harm the child’s mental, physical, or emotional health;
The court shall state in its decision specific findings of fact in support of its HB4220 - 7 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b modification or termination of the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling visitation.
The court shall state in its decision specific findings of fact in support of its HB4220 Engrossed - 7 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b modification or termination of the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling visitation.
(C) the parent is deceased or is disabled and is unable HB4220 - 8 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b to care for the child;
(C) the parent is deceased or is disabled and is unable HB4220 Engrossed - 8 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b to care for the child;
but the court shall not restrict a parent’s visitation rights unless it finds that the visitation would endanger seriously the child’s physical, HB4220 - 9 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b mental, moral or emotional health.
but the court shall not restrict a parent’s visitation rights unless it finds that the visitation would endanger seriously the child’s physical, HB4220 Engrossed - 9 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b mental, moral or emotional health.
HB4220 - 10 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b (2) Any order granting visitation privileges with the child to a grandparent or great-grandparent who is related to the child through the non-custodial parent shall contain the following provision:
HB4220 Engrossed - 10 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b (2) Any order granting visitation privileges with the child to a grandparent or great-grandparent who is related to the child through the non-custodial parent shall contain the following provision:
(f) Unless the court determines, after considering all HB4220 - 11 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Section 602(a), that it would be in the best interests of the child to allow visitation, the court shall not enter an order providing visitation rights and pursuant to a motion to modify visitation shall revoke visitation rights previously granted to any person who would otherwise be entitled to petition for visitation rights under this Section who has been convicted of first degree murder of the parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling of the child who is the subject of the order.
(f) Unless the court determines, after considering all HB4220 Engrossed - 11 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Section 602(a), that it would be in the best interests of the child to allow visitation, the court shall not enter an order providing visitation rights and pursuant to a motion to modify visitation shall revoke visitation rights previously granted to any person who would otherwise be entitled to petition for visitation rights under this Section who has been convicted of first degree murder of the parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling of the child who is the subject of the order.
(h) Notwithstanding any other rulemaking authority that may exist, neither the Governor nor any agency or agency head under the jurisdiction of the Governor has any authority to make or promulgate rules to implement or enforce the provisions of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly.
If, however, the Governor believes that rules are necessary to implement or enforce the provisions of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly, the Governor may suggest rules to the General Assembly by filing them with the Clerk of the House HB4220 Engrossed - 12 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b and Secretary of the Senate and by requesting that the General Assembly authorize such rulemaking by law, enact those suggested rules into law, or take any other appropriate action in the General Assembly’s discretion.
Nothing contained in this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly shall be interpreted to grant rulemaking authority under any other Illinois statute where such authority is not otherwise explicitly given.
For the purposes of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly, "rules" is given the meaning contained in Section 1-70 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act, and "agency" and "agency head" are given the meanings contained in Sections 1-20 and 1-25 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act to the extent that such definitions apply to agencies or agency heads under the jurisdiction of the Governor.
HB4220 - 12 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b The burden of proving that such removal is in the best interests of such child or children is on the party seeking the removal.
The burden of proving that such removal is in the best interests of such child or children is on the party seeking the HB4220 Engrossed - 13 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b removal.
(d) Notwithstanding any other rulemaking authority that may exist, neither the Governor nor any agency or agency head under the jurisdiction of the Governor has any authority to make or promulgate rules to implement or enforce the provisions of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly.
If, however, the Governor believes that rules are necessary to implement or enforce the provisions of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly, the Governor may suggest rules to the General Assembly by filing them with the Clerk of the House and Secretary of the Senate and by requesting that the General Assembly authorize such rulemaking by law, enact those suggested rules into law, or take any other appropriate action HB4220 Engrossed - 14 - LRB095 15333 AJO 41321 b in the General Assembly’s discretion.
Nothing contained in this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly shall be interpreted to grant rulemaking authority under any other Illinois statute where such authority is not otherwise explicitly given.
For the purposes of this amendatory Act of the 95th General Assembly, "rules" is given the meaning contained in Section 1-70 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act, and "agency" and "agency head" are given the meanings contained in Sections 1-20 and 1-25 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act to the extent that such definitions apply to agencies or agency heads under the jurisdiction of the Governor.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Session Sine Die

  2. Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 22, 2008; Substantive House Bills Out of Committee

  3. Referred to Rules

  4. First Reading

  5. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Pamela J. Althoff

  6. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  7. Arrive in Senate

  8. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000

  9. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Sandra M. Pihos

  10. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Rosemary Mulligan

  11. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patricia R. Bellock

  12. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  13. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted by Voice Vote

  14. Second Reading - Short Debate

  15. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 005-000-000

  16. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee

  17. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Ruth Munson

  18. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  19. Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 010-000-000

  20. Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee

  21. Referred to Rules Committee

  22. First Reading

  23. Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Ruth Munson

Sponsors

  • Ruth Munson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Ruth Munson

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 114 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 101004
Republican 4000
Democrat 9000
Total 114004
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Myers — Yea
Holbrook — Yea
Jefferies — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Wait — Yea
Krause — Yea
Lang — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Dunn — Yea
Mathias — Yea
Reitz — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Lyons — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Meyer — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Munson — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Riley — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Bradley, John — Yea
Brady — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Burke — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Hannig — Yea
Harris — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Coladipietro — Yea
Cole — Yea
Colvin — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Flider — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Froehlich — Yea
Golar — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Graham — Yea
Granberg — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Hassert — Yea
Madigan — Yea
Howard — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Patterson — Yea
Bradley, Richard — Not Voting
Watson — Not Voting
Pihos — Yea
Washington — Not Voting
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Younge — Yea
Coulson — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Kosel — Yea
Osmond — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Reboletti — Yea
Reis — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Yea
Schock — Yea
Scully — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Soto — Yea
Lindner — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Yea
May — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Molaro — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Dugan — Not Voting
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 4220 do?
Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides for reasonable visitation between a child and a non-custodial parent through electronic communication such as telephone, e-mail, instant messaging, and other modes of electronic communication. Provides that the court may not use time spent in electronic communication to affect child support, custody, visitation, or removal of a child from the State. Provides for the custodial parent to provide any new e-mail address of the child to the noncustodial parent within 24 hours of the change. Makes other changes concerning electronic communication between a parent and a child and between a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling and a child.
Who sponsors HB 4220?
HB 4220 is sponsored by Ruth Munson.
What is the current status of HB 4220?
This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 4220?
Track HB 4220 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 4220

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 4220

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →