FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE ACT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 374 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 374.
You're tracking HB 374
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 374 — FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE ACT
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creates the Illinois Family and Medical Leave Act. Contains provisions similar to those in the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, except that it applies to a son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, or mother-in-law who has a serious health condition, and some of the provisions of the federal law pertaining to federal employees and federal matters have been deleted or changed. Effective 6 months after becoming law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
30 added · 47 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 374 has made some important changes by adding provisions that expand family leave eligibility. Now, employees can take leave to care for in-laws with serious health conditions, which was not included in earlier drafts of the bill. This change is significant because it recognizes the importance of supporting a wider range of family relationships during difficult times, reflecting a more inclusive approach to family medical leave.
*LRB09505244WGH25321b* HB0374 95THEngrossed GENERALLRB095 ASSEMBLY05244 StateWGH of25321 Illinoisb andAN 2008ACT HB0374concerning Introducedemployment. 1/26/2007, by Rep.
Jack D.
Franks SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act Creates the Illinois Family and Medical Leave Act.
Contains provisions similar to those in the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, except that it applies to a son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, or mother-in-law who has a serious health condition, and some of the provisions of the federal law pertaining to federal employees and federal law.ers have been deleted or changed.
Effective 6 months after becoming LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b A BILL FOR HB0374 LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b AN ACT concerning employment.
HB0374 Engrossed - 2 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (5) due to the nature of the roles of men and women in our society, the primary responsibility for family caretaking often falls on women, and such responsibility affects the working lives of women more than it affects the working lives of men;
(4) to accomplish the purposes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) in a manner that, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, minimizes the potential for employment discrimination on the basis of HB0374 Engrossed - 3 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b sex by ensuring generally that leave is available for eligible medical reasons (including maternity-related disability) and for compelling family reasons, on a gender-neutral basis;
or (ii) any employee of an employer who is employed at a work site at which such employer employs less than 50 employees if the total number of employees employed by that employer within 75 miles of that work site is less HB0374 Engrossed - 4 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b than 50.
HB0374 Engrossed - 5 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (5) Employment benefits.
The term "Director" means the Director of HB0374 Engrossed - 6 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b Labor.
(B) Because of the placement of a son or daughter HB0374 Engrossed - 7 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b with the employee for adoption or foster care.
The taking of leave intermittently or on a reduced leave HB0374 Engrossed - 8 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b schedule pursuant to this paragraph shall not result in a reduction in the total amount of leave to which the employee is entitled under subsection (a) beyond the amount of leave actually taken.
If an employer provides paid leave for fewer than 12 workweeks, the additional weeks of leave necessary to attain the 12 workweeks of leave required HB0374 Engrossed - 9 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b under this Article may be provided without compensation.
In any case in which the necessity for leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) is foreseeable based on an expected birth or placement, the employee shall provide the employer with not less than 30 days’ notice, before the date the leave is HB0374 Engrossed - 10 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b to begin, of the employee’s intention to take leave under such subparagraph, except that if the date of the birth or placement requires leave to begin in less than 30 days, the employee shall provide such notice as is practicable.
In any case in which a husband and wife entitled to leave under subsection (a) are employed by the same employer, the aggregate number of workweeks of leave to which both may be entitled may be limited to 12 workweeks during any 12-month period, if such leave is HB0374 Engrossed - 11 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b taken:
(4)(A) for purposes of leave under Section 102(a)(1)(C), a statement that the eligible employee is needed to care for the son, daughter, spouse, parent, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, or HB0374 Engrossed - 12 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b mother-in-law and an estimate of the amount of time that such employee is needed to care for the son, daughter, spouse, parent, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, or mother-in-law;
HB0374 Engrossed - 13 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (c) Second opinion.
The employer may require HB0374 Engrossed - 14 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b that the eligible employee obtain subsequent recertifications on a reasonable basis.
HB0374 Engrossed - 15 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (4) Certification.
(B) the employer notifies the employee of the intent of the employer to deny restoration on such basis at the time the employer determines that such HB0374 Engrossed - 16 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b injury would occur;
and HB0374 Engrossed - 17 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (B) the employee fails to return to work for a reason other than:
The employee shall provide, in a timely HB0374 Engrossed - 18 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b manner, a copy of such certification to the employer.
It shall be unlawful for any HB0374 Engrossed - 19 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b employer to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual for opposing any practice made unlawful by this Article.
(c) Required submissions generally limited to an annual HB0374 Engrossed - 20 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b basis.
or (II) in a case in which wages, salary, employment benefits, or other compensation have not been denied or lost to the employee, any actual monetary losses sustained by the employee as a direct result of the violation, such as the cost of providing care, up to a sum HB0374 Engrossed - 21 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b equal to 12 weeks of wages or salary for the employee;
An action to recover the damages or equitable relief prescribed in paragraph (1) may be maintained against any employer (including a public agency) in the circuit court by any one or more employees HB0374 Engrossed - 22 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b for and in behalf of:
HB0374 Engrossed - 23 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b (1) Administrative action.
In determining when an action is commenced by the Director under this Section for the purposes of this subsection, it shall be considered to be HB0374 Engrossed - 24 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b commenced on the date when the complaint is filed.
and (B) any private elementary or secondary school and HB0374 Engrossed - 25 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b an eligible employee of the school.
Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which an eligible employee employed principally in an instructional capacity by any such educational agency or school requests leave under subparagraph (C) or (D) of Section 102(a)(1) that is foreseeable based on planned medical treatment and the employee would be on leave for greater than 20 percent of the total number of working days HB0374 Engrossed - 26 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b in the period during which the leave would extend, the agency or school may require that such employee elect either:
If the eligible employee begins leave under Section 102 more than 5 weeks prior to the end of the academic term, the HB0374 Engrossed - 27 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b agency or school may require the employee to continue taking leave until the end of such term, if:
For purposes of determinations under Section 104(a)(1)(B) (relating to the restoration of an eligible employee to an equivalent position), in the case of a local educational agency HB0374 Engrossed - 28 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b or a private elementary or secondary school, such determination shall be made on the basis of established school board policies and practices, private school policies and practices, and collective bargaining agreements.
HB0374 Engrossed - 29 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b ARTICLE II.
HB0374 Engrossed - 30 - LRB095 05244 WGH 25321 b Section 403.
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 22, 2008; Substantive House Bills Out of Committee
-
Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Rules
-
Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As December 31, 2007
-
Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 31, 2007
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 22, 2007
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 16, 2007
-
Do Pass as Amended Labor; 006-004-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Labor
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Labor
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Terry Link
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Terry Link
-
Assigned to Labor
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Terry Link
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading April 24, 2007
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Verified
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 062-050-001
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Boland
-
Placed on Calendar - Consideration Postponed April 17, 2007
-
Third Reading - Consideration Postponed
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Julie Hamos
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Fiscal Note Filed
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Labor Committee; 013-008-000
-
Assigned to Labor Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Jack D. Franks
Sponsors
- Jack D. Franks · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Jack D. Franks
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 48 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 62 | 50 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 42% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hassert | — | Nay |
| Myers | — | Nay |
| Jefferies | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Nay |
| Leitch | — | Nay |
| Lindner | — | Nay |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Nay |
| Meyer | — | Nay |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Nay |
| Mulligan | — | Nay |
| Munson | — | Nay |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Nay |
| Schock | — | Nay |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Nay |
| Turner | — | Nay |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Nay |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Nay |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Nay |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Nay |
| Sullivan | — | Nay |
| Watson | — | Nay |
| Coladipietro | — | Nay |
| Cole | — | Nay |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Nay |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Nay |
| Durkin | — | Nay |
| Fortner | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Nay |
| Sommer | — | Not Voting |
| Winters | — | Nay |
| Cultra | — | Nay |
| Froehlich | — | Not Voting |
| Kosel | — | Nay |
| Cross | — | Nay |
| Osmond | — | Nay |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Poe | — | Nay |
| Pritchard | — | Nay |
| Reboletti | — | Nay |
| Reis | — | Nay |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Nay |
| Saviano | — | Nay |
| Schmitz | — | Not Voting |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Nay |
| Beaubien | — | Nay |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Nay |
| Mathias | — | Nay |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Nay |
| Black | — | Nay |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Nay |
| Brauer | — | Nay |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Nay |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 374 do?
- Creates the Illinois Family and Medical Leave Act. Contains provisions similar to those in the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, except that it applies to a son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, or mother-in-law who has a serious health condition, and some of the provisions of the federal law pertaining to federal employees and federal matters have been deleted or changed. Effective 6 months after becoming law.
- Who sponsors HB 374?
- HB 374 is sponsored by Jack D. Franks.
- What is the current status of HB 374?
- This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 374?
- Track HB 374 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 374
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 374
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →