CIV PRO-FORECLOSURE POSSESSION
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 258 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 258.
You're tracking SB 258
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 258 — CIV PRO-FORECLOSURE POSSESSION
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0262
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2007. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
0 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that, in a case of foreclosure where the tenant is current on his or her rent, any order of possession must allow the tenant to retain possession of the property covered in his or her rental agreement (i) for 120 days following the notice of the hearing on the supplemental petition that has been properly served upon the tenant, or (ii) through the duration of his or her lease, whichever is shorter. Provides that the exception for continued possession by the tenant only applies if the tenant continues to pay his or her rent in full during the 120-day period.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
7 added · 7 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 258 underwent changes where specific lines of text were both added and removed. While the exact content of the changes isn't specified, these adjustments typically serve to clarify language, update provisions, or align the bill with current laws or needs. These changes are important as they can directly affect how the law is understood and implemented, ensuring that it addresses the issues intended by lawmakers.
SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
(1) In the case of residential real estate, the mortgagor shall be entitled to possession of the real estate except if (i) the mortgagee shall object and show good cause, (ii) the mortgagee is so authorized by the terms of the mortgage or other written instrument, and SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b (iii) the court is satisfied that there is a reasonable probability that the mortgagee will prevail on a final hearing of the cause, the court shall upon request place the mortgagee in possession.
(1) Subsection (b) of Section 15-1701 shall be applicable, regardless of the provisions of the mortgage or other instrument, except that after a sale pursuant to the judgment the holder of the certificate of sale (or, if none, the purchaser at the sale) shall have the mortgagee’s right to be placed in possession, with all rights and SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b duties of a mortgagee in possession under this Article.
This right to possession shall be limited by SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 4 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b the provisions governing entering and enforcing orders of possession under subsection (g) of Section 15-1508.
Except as may be authorized by this Article, SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 5 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b no mortgage or other instrument may modify or supersede the provisions of this Article.
The proceeding for the termination of such occupant’s SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 6 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b possessory interest, including service of the notice of the hearing and the petition, shall in all respects comport with the requirements of Article 9 of this Code, except as otherwise specified in this Section.
This item (4) shall only apply if the tenant continues to pay his or her rent in full during the 120-day SB0258 EngrossedEnrolled - 7 - LRB095 09724 LCT 29928 b period.
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies existing laws regarding the rights and processes of possession of mortgaged real estate during foreclosure in Illinois.
-
735 ILCS 5/15-1701
the court shall upon request place the mortgagee in possession.→ the court shall upon request place the mortgagee in possession, except that if the mortgagor shall object and show good cause, the court shall allow the mortgagor to remain in possession.This change modifies the conditions under which a mortgagee can take possession of property, adding protections for the mortgagor.
-
735 ILCS 5/15-1701
upon request of the mortgagee, a mortgagor of residential real estate shall not be allowed to remain in possession between the expiration of the redemption period and through the 30th day after sale confirmation unless→ upon request of the mortgagee, a mortgagor of residential real estate shall not be allowed to remain in possession between the expiration of the redemption period and through the 30th day after sale confirmation unless (i) the mortgagor pays to the mortgagee or such holder or purchaser, whichever is applicable, monthly the lesser of the interest due under the mortgage calculated at the mortgage rate of interest applicable as if no default had occurred or the fair rental value of the real estate, or (ii) the mortgagor otherwise shows good cause.This change imposes stricter conditions on mortgagors wishing to remain in possession of the property after the foreclosure sale.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0262
-
Effective Date January 1, 2008
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 115-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack D. Franks
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Wyvetter H. Younge
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Sidney H. Mathias
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 011-000-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Arthur L. Turner
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Karen A. Yarbrough
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Al Riley
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
-
Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 27, 2007
-
Second Reading
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Rules
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 15, 2007
-
Do Pass Housing and Community Affairs; 006-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Held in Housing and Community Affairs
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Housing and Community Affairs
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. M. Maggie Crotty
-
Held in Housing and Community Affairs
-
Assigned to Housing and Community Affairs
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. M. Maggie Crotty
Sponsors
- M. Maggie Crotty · Cosponsor
- Jack D. Franks · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (2)
- M. Maggie Crotty
- Jack D. Franks
Not signed on (181)
181 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 181 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 102 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 115 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Not Voting |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| May | — | Not Voting |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Not Voting |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Not Voting |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 258 do?
- Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that, in a case of foreclosure where the tenant is current on his or her rent, any order of possession must allow the tenant to retain possession of the property covered in his or her rental agreement (i) for 120 days following the notice of the hearing on the supplemental petition that has been properly served upon the tenant, or (ii) through the duration of his or her lease, whichever is shorter. Provides that the exception for continued possession by the tenant only applies if the tenant continues to pay his or her rent in full during the 120-day period.
- Who sponsors SB 258?
- SB 258 is sponsored by M. Maggie Crotty and Jack D. Franks.
- What is the current status of SB 258?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2007. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 258?
- Track SB 258 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 258
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 258
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →