EPA-RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 496 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 496.
You're tracking HB 496
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 496 — EPA-RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0121
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2007. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Environmental Protection Act. Provides that with regard to the definition of "waste", reclaimed asphalt pavement is not speculatively accumulated if it is returned to the economic mainstream within 4 years after the date of its generation or if a properly executed bond, that has been approved by the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency, exists between the owner of the reclaimed asphalt pavement and the Agency for the removal of the reclaimed asphalt pavement. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
4 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of HB 496, the term "Engrossed" has been changed to "Enrolled," indicating that the bill has moved further along in the legislative process. This shift signifies that the bill is now final and ready to be sent to the governor for approval or veto. This change is important because it demonstrates progress toward the bill becoming law, impacting the proposed measures it addresses.
HB0496 EngrossedEnrolled LRB095 04713 CMK 24772 b AN ACT concerning safety.
General construction or demolition debris does not include uncontaminated soil generated during construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition of utilities, structures, and roads HB0496 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB095 04713 CMK 24772 b provided the uncontaminated soil is not commingled with any general construction or demolition debris or other waste.
To the extent allowed by federal law, clean construction or demolition debris shall not be considered "waste" if it is (i) used as fill material outside of a setback zone if the fill is placed no higher than the highest point of elevation existing prior to the filling immediately adjacent to the fill area, and if covered by sufficient uncontaminated soil to support HB0496 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB095 04713 CMK 24772 b vegetation within 30 days of the completion of filling or if covered by a road or structure, or (ii) separated or processed and returned to the economic mainstream in the form of raw materials or products, if it is not speculatively accumulated and, if used as a fill material, it is used in accordance with item (i) within 30 days of its generation , or (iii) solely broken concrete without protruding metal bars used for erosion control, or (iv) generated from the construction or demolition of a building, road, or other structure and used to construct, on the site where the construction or demolition has taken place, a manmade functional structure not to exceed 20 feet above the highest point of elevation of the property immediately adjacent to the new manmade functional structure as that elevation existed prior to the creation of that new structure, provided that the structure shall be covered with sufficient soil materials to sustain vegetation or by a road or structure, and further provided that no such structure shall be constructed within a home rule municipality with a population over 500,000 without the consent of the municipality.
(iii) at least 25% of the total amount present at a site during HB0496 EngrossedEnrolled - 4 - LRB095 04713 CMK 24772 b a calendar year is transported off of the site during the next calendar year;
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies definitions and conditions regarding construction or demolition debris in the Environmental Protection Act.
-
415 ILCS 5/3.160
and shall not be considered "waste" if it is separated or processed and returned to the economic mainstream in the form of raw materials or products within 4 years of its generation,→ and shall not be considered "waste" if it is separated or processed and returned to the economic mainstream in the form of raw materials or products within 4 years of its generation, if it is not speculatively accumulated and, if used as a fill material, it is used in accordance with item (i) in subsection (b) of this Section within 30 days of its generation.This change adds conditions regarding non-speculative accumulation and specific usage timeframes for concrete to be classified as clean construction debris.
-
415 ILCS 5/3.160
for erosion control, or (iv) generated from the construction or demolition of a building, road, or other structure and used to construct, on the site where the construction or demolition has taken place, a manmade functional structure not to exceed 20 feet above the highest point of elevation of the property immediately adjacent to the new manmade functional structure as that elevation existed prior to the creation of that new structure, provided that the structure shall be covered with sufficient soil materials to sustain vegetation or by a road or structure,→ for erosion control, or (iv) generated from the construction or demolition of a building, road, or other structure and used to construct, on the site where the construction or demolition has taken place, a manmade functional structure not to exceed 20 feet above the highest point of elevation of the property immediately adjacent to the new manmade functional structure as that elevation existed prior to the creation of that new structure, provided that the structure shall be covered with sufficient soil materials to sustain vegetation or by a road or structure, and further provided that no such structure shall be constructed within a home rule municipality with a population over 500,000 without the consent of the municipality.This addition establishes a requirement for obtaining consent from larger home rule municipalities before constructing new structures from clean construction debris.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0121
-
Effective Date August 13, 2007
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Passed; 059-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 8, 2007
-
Second Reading
-
Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Dale E. Risinger
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading April 20, 2007
-
Do Pass Environment and Energy; 010-000-000
-
Assigned to Environment and Energy
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. William R. Haine
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading March 21, 2007
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Boland
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 116-000-000
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jim Durkin
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Environment & Energy Committee; 017-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Environment & Energy Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Environment & Energy Committee
-
Assigned to Environment & Energy Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Daniel V. Beiser
Sponsors
- Daniel V. Beiser · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Daniel V. Beiser
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 103 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 116 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Not Voting |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 496 do?
- Amends the Environmental Protection Act. Provides that with regard to the definition of "waste", reclaimed asphalt pavement is not speculatively accumulated if it is returned to the economic mainstream within 4 years after the date of its generation or if a properly executed bond, that has been approved by the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency, exists between the owner of the reclaimed asphalt pavement and the Agency for the removal of the reclaimed asphalt pavement. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors HB 496?
- HB 496 is sponsored by Daniel V. Beiser.
- What is the current status of HB 496?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2007. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 496?
- Track HB 496 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 496
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 496
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →