CRIMINAL-LISTENING DEVICE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 97 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 97.
You're tracking SB 97
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 97 — CRIMINAL-LISTENING DEVICE
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0258
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2007. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
0 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Provides that, with prior notification to the State's Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation taking place within or about any motor vehicle under the control and direction of a law enforcement officer, under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the detection or investigation of the theft of that motor vehicle is exempt from the Code's eavesdropping provisions. Requires the Director of State Police to issue regulations as are necessary concerning the use of devices, retention of tape recordings, and reports regarding their use. Provides that any recording or evidence derived as the result of the exemption is inadmissible in any proceeding, criminal, civil, or administrative, except for (i) the theft of the motor vehicle in question, (ii) the commission of any crime taking place within, or otherwise involving the use of, the motor vehicle in question, or (iii) when used as direct impeachment of a witness concerning matters contained in the interception or recording.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill SB 97 involve replacing the term "Engrossed" with "Enrolled" in the document. This update signifies that the bill has formally passed through legislative sessions and is now in its final form, ready for the governor's approval. Understanding this distinction is important as it reflects the bill's progress toward becoming law and confirms its completion of the legislative process.
SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b (1) Knowingly employs another who illegally uses an eavesdropping device in the course of such employment;
For purposes of this Article, the term bait car means any SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b motor vehicle that is not occupied by a law enforcement officer and is used by a law enforcement agency to deter, detect, identify, and assist in the apprehension of an auto theft suspect in the act of stealing a motor vehicle.
(d) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to any emergency communication made in the normal course of operations by any federal, state or local law enforcement agency or institutions dealing in emergency services, including, but not limited to, hospitals, clinics, ambulance SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 4 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b services, fire fighting agencies, any public utility, emergency repair facility, civilian defense establishment or military installation;
(g) With prior notification to the State’s Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, in the course of an investigation of a SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 5 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b forcible felony, a felony violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, a felony violation of the Cannabis Control Act, a felony violation of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act, or any "streetgang related" or "gang-related" felony as those terms are defined in the Illinois Streetgang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act.
In the absence of such an order, or upon its denial, any continuing use shall SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 6 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b immediately terminate.
(i) Recording of a conversation made by or at the request of a person, not a law enforcement officer or agent of a law enforcement officer, who is a party to the conversation, under reasonable suspicion that another party to the conversation is committing, is about to commit, or has committed a criminal offense against the person or a member of his or her immediate SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 7 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b household, and there is reason to believe that evidence of the criminal offense may be obtained by the recording;
No communication or conversation or any part, portion, or aspect of the communication or conversation made, acquired, or obtained, directly or indirectly, under this exemption (j), may be, directly or indirectly, furnished to any law enforcement officer, agency, or official for any purpose or used in any SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 8 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b inquiry or investigation, or used, directly or indirectly, in any administrative, judicial, or other proceeding, or divulged to any third party.
For the purposes of this subsection (j), "telephone solicitation" means a communication through the use of a SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 9 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b telephone by live operators:
and (l) Recording the interview or statement of any person when the person knows that the interview is being conducted by a law enforcement officer or prosecutor and the interview takes place at a police station that is currently participating in the SB0097 EngrossedEnrolled - 10 - LRB095 03357 RLC 23361 b Custodial Interview Pilot Program established under the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Act;
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0258
-
Effective Date January 1, 2008
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 115-000-000
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack D. Franks
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick J Verschoore
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jim Sacia
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 009-001-001
-
Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Dan Reitz
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 057-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 6, 2007
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 2, 2007
-
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary Criminal Law; 007-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. William R. Haine
-
Assigned to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. William R. Haine
Sponsors
- William R. Haine · Cosponsor
- Jack D. Franks · Cosponsor
- Chapa LaVia · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (3)
- William R. Haine
- Jack D. Franks
- Chapa LaVia
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 102 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 115 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jefferies | — | Not Voting |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Lyons | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Coladipietro | — | Yea |
| Cole | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Not Voting |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Not Voting |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Not Voting |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 97 do?
- Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Provides that, with prior notification to the State's Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation taking place within or about any motor vehicle under the control and direction of a law enforcement officer, under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the detection or investigation of the theft of that motor vehicle is exempt from the Code's eavesdropping provisions. Requires the Director of State Police to issue regulations as are necessary concerning the use of devices, retention of tape recordings, and reports regarding their use. Provides that any recording or evidence derived as the result of the exemption is inadmissible in any proceeding, criminal, civil, or administrative, except for (i) the theft of the motor vehicle in question, (ii) the commission of any crime taking place within, or otherwise involving the use of, the motor vehicle in question, or (iii) when used as direct impeachment of a witness concerning matters contained in the interception or recording.
- Who sponsors SB 97?
- SB 97 is sponsored by William R. Haine, Jack D. Franks, and Chapa LaVia.
- What is the current status of SB 97?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2007. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 97?
- Track SB 97 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 97
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 97
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →