CRIM CD-EAVESDROPPING EXEMPT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2137 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2137.
You're tracking SB 2137
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2137 — CRIM CD-EAVESDROPPING EXEMPT
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Exempts from an eavesdropping violation any recordings made simultaneously with a video recording of any conversations occurring upon a peace officer responding to a scene in the investigation of any criminal offense under Illinois law. Also exempts from an eavesdropping violation recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement in the course of an investigation of a felony weapons offense with prior notification to the State's Attorney of the county in which the recording or listening to the conversation is to occur.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 34 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill SB 2137 primarily involve the removal of specific lines and additional details regarding eavesdropping laws related to law enforcement. The amendment clarifies the circumstances under which recordings during criminal investigations are exempt from eavesdropping violations, specifically highlighting the need for consent from law enforcement. This matters because it aims to enhance the protection of law enforcement officers during investigations while ensuring that the public is aware of their rights regarding privacy and consent.
*LRB09519401RLC45696b* SB2137 95THEngrossed GENERALLRB095 ASSEMBLY19401 StateRLC of45696 Illinoisb andAN 2008ACT SB2137concerning Introducedcriminal 2/14/2008,law. by Sen.
John J.
Millner SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 5/14-3 Amends the Criminal Code of 1961.
Exempts from an eavesdropping violation any recordings made simultaneously with a video recording of any conversations occurring upon a peace officer responding to a scene in the investigation of any criminal offense under Illinois law.
Also exempts from an eavesdropping violation recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement in the course of an investigation of a felony weapons offense with prior notification to the State’s Attorney of the county in which the recording or listening to the conversation is to occur.
LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b A BILL FOR SB2137 LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
(d) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to any emergency communication made in the normal course of SB2137 Engrossed - 2 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b operations by any federal, state or local law enforcement agency or institutions dealing in emergency services, including, but not limited to, hospitals, clinics, ambulance services, fire fighting agencies, any public utility, emergency repair facility, civilian defense establishment or military installation;
(g) With prior notification to the State’s Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where SB2137 Engrossed - 3 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, in the course of an investigation of a forcible felony, a felony violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, a felony violation of the Cannabis Control Act, a felony violation of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act, or any "streetgang related" or "gang-related" felony as those terms are defined in the Illinois Streetgang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act, or any felony offense involving any weapon listed in subsections 24-1(a)(1) through 24-1(a)(11) of this Code.
(g-5) With approval of the State’s Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded in the course of an investigation of SB2137 Engrossed - 4 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b any offense defined in Article 29D of this Code.
(g-6) With approval of the State’s Attorney of the county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being SB2137 Engrossed - 5 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b intercepted or recorded in the course of an investigation of child pornography.
SB2137 Engrossed - 6 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b (i) Recording of a conversation made by or at the request of a person, not a law enforcement officer or agent of a law enforcement officer, who is a party to the conversation, under reasonable suspicion that another party to the conversation is committing, is about to commit, or has committed a criminal offense against the person or a member of his or her immediate household, and there is reason to believe that evidence of the criminal offense may be obtained by the recording;
and (ii) the monitoring is used with the consent of at least one person who is an active party to the marketing or opinion research conversation or telephone solicitation SB2137 Engrossed - 7 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b conversation being monitored.
Business entities that use a telephone monitoring or SB2137 Engrossed - 8 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b telephone recording system pursuant to this exemption (j) shall provide their employees or agents with access to personal-only telephone lines which may be pay telephones, that are not subject to telephone monitoring or telephone recording.
(k) Electronic recordings, including but not limited to, a motion picture, videotape, digital, or other visual or audio recording, made of a custodial interrogation of an individual at a police station or other place of detention by a law enforcement officer under Section 5-401.5 of the Juvenile Court SB2137 Engrossed - 9 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b Act of 1987 or Section 103-2.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963;
SB2137 Engrossed - 10 - LRB095 19401 RLC 45696 b (n) (m) Recording or listening to an audio transmission from a microphone placed by a person under the authority of a law enforcement agency inside a bait car surveillance vehicle while simultaneously capturing a photographic or video image.
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Fortner
-
Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Susana A Mendoza
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Mike Fortner
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Michael Noland
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Antonio Munoz
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 1, 2008
-
Second Reading
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Martin A. Sandoval
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Pamela J. Althoff
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 13, 2008
-
Do Pass Judiciary Criminal Law; 008-000-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary Criminal Law
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Millner
Sponsors
- John J. Millner · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- John J. Millner
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Steans | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Not Voting |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Not Voting |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Not Voting |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bivins | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Bond | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2137 do?
- Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Exempts from an eavesdropping violation any recordings made simultaneously with a video recording of any conversations occurring upon a peace officer responding to a scene in the investigation of any criminal offense under Illinois law. Also exempts from an eavesdropping violation recording or listening with the aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement in the course of an investigation of a felony weapons offense with prior notification to the State's Attorney of the county in which the recording or listening to the conversation is to occur.
- Who sponsors SB 2137?
- SB 2137 is sponsored by John J. Millner.
- What is the current status of SB 2137?
- This bill died with 95th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2137?
- Track SB 2137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2137
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2137
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →