Illinois 95th Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 265 — CRIM PRO-CLOSED CIRCUIT TV

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0263

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2007. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that whenever the appearance in person in court, in either a civil or criminal proceeding, is required of anyone held in a place of custody or confinement operated by the State or any of its political subdivisions, including counties and municipalities, the chief judge of the circuit by rule may permit the personal appearance to be made by means of two-way audio-visual communication, including closed circuit television and computerized video conference under specified conditions. Provides that the two-way audio-visual communication facilities must provide two-way audio-visual communication between the court and the place of custody or confinement, and must include a secure line over which the person in custody and his or her counsel, if any, may communicate. Provides that this provision shall not be construed to prohibit other court appearances through the use of two-way audio-visual communication, upon waiver of any right the person in custody or confinement may have to be present physically. Provides that this provision shall not be construed to establish a right of any person held in custody or confinement to appear in court through two-way audio-visual communication or to require that any governmental entity, or place of custody or confinement, provide two-way audio-visual communication. Effective immediately.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

3 added · 3 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 265 has updated some of its language by removing certain lines and adding new ones. This change is important because it could clarify the bill's intentions or modify its requirements, ensuring that it aligns better with the needs of the community it aims to serve. These kinds of amendments are essential for refining legislation and making it more effective.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0265 Engrossed LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
SB0265 Enrolled LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
SB0265 Engrossed - 2 - LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b (5) any status hearing;
SB0265 Enrolled - 2 - LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b (5) any status hearing;
SB0265 Engrossed - 3 - LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b (a) the court has authorized the use of closed circuit television and has by rule or order set out the type of proceedings that may be conducted by closed circuit television;
SB0265 Enrolled - 3 - LRB095 03739 RLC 23766 b (a) the court has authorized the use of closed circuit television and has by rule or order set out the type of proceedings that may be conducted by closed circuit television;
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0263

  2. Effective Date August 17, 2007

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 115-000-000

  7. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  8. Second Reading - Short Debate

  9. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  10. Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 013-000-000

  11. Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee

  12. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Marlow H. Colvin

  13. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Careen M Gordon

  14. Referred to Rules Committee

  15. First Reading

  16. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Constance A. Howard

  17. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  18. Arrived in House

  19. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  20. Third Reading - Passed; 057-001-000

  21. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 21, 2007

  22. Second Reading

  23. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 15, 2007

  24. Do Pass as Amended Judiciary Criminal Law; 007-000-000

  25. Senate Committee Amendment No. 3 Adopted

  26. Senate Committee Amendment No. 3 Rules Refers to Judiciary Criminal Law

  27. Senate Committee Amendment No. 3 Referred to Rules

  28. Senate Committee Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Donne E. Trotter

  29. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules

  30. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Donne E. Trotter

  31. Held in Judiciary Criminal Law

  32. Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Dale A. Righter

  33. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted

  34. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary Criminal Law

  35. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules

  36. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Donne E. Trotter

  37. Postponed - Judiciary Criminal Law

  38. Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. John J. Millner

  39. Assigned to Judiciary Criminal Law

  40. Referred to Rules

  41. First Reading

  42. Filed with Secretary by Sen. Donne E. Trotter

Sponsors

  • Donne E. Trotter · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Donne E. Trotter

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 115 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 102003
Democrat 9000
Republican 4000
Total 115003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Holbrook — Yea
Jefferies — Not Voting
Jefferson — Yea
Krause — Yea
Lang — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Mathias — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Reitz — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Molaro — Yea
Lyons — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Schock — Yea
Scully — Yea
Sommer — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Bradley, John — Yea
Bradley, Richard — Yea
Brady — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Burke — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Dunn — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Flider — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Froehlich — Yea
Golar — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Graham — Yea
Granberg — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Hannig — Yea
Harris — Yea
Madigan — Yea
May — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Munson — Yea
Myers — Yea
Watson — Yea
Howard — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Patterson — Not Voting
Pihos — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Washington — Yea
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Younge — Yea
Coladipietro — Yea
Cole — Yea
Colvin — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Hassert — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Kosel — Yea
Osmond — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Reboletti — Yea
Reis — Yea
Riley — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Yea
Soto — Yea
Lindner — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Meyer — Yea
Coulson — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 57 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 49000
Democrat 8001
Republican 0100
Total 57101
% of votes cast 97%2%0%2%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Haine — Yea
Halvorson — Yea
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
Meeks — Yea
Millner — Yea
Brady — Yea
Noland — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Sieben — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Watson — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Forby — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Peterson — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Ronen — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Lauzen — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Not Voting
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 265 do?
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that whenever the appearance in person in court, in either a civil or criminal proceeding, is required of anyone held in a place of custody or confinement operated by the State or any of its political subdivisions, including counties and municipalities, the chief judge of the circuit by rule may permit the personal appearance to be made by means of two-way audio-visual communication, including closed circuit television and computerized video conference under specified conditions. Provides that the two-way audio-visual communication facilities must provide two-way audio-visual communication between the court and the place of custody or confinement, and must include a secure line over which the person in custody and his or her counsel, if any, may communicate. Provides that this provision shall not be construed to prohibit other court appearances through the use of two-way audio-visual communication, upon waiver of any right the person in custody or confinement may have to be present physically. Provides that this provision shall not be construed to establish a right of any person held in custody or confinement to appear in court through two-way audio-visual communication or to require that any governmental entity, or place of custody or confinement, provide two-way audio-visual communication. Effective immediately.
Who sponsors SB 265?
SB 265 is sponsored by Donne E. Trotter.
What is the current status of SB 265?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2007. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 265?
Track SB 265 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 265

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 265

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →