Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 11 D cosponsors

SB 5956 — Addressing artificial intelligence, student discipline, and surveillance in public schools.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 31, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

139 added · 152 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 5956 has made key changes regarding the use of automated systems to evaluate students. It now prohibits using these systems as the sole basis for generating risk scores related to misconduct or violence, emphasizing that they cannot be the only factor in such assessments. Additionally, the bill no longer allows for the use of biometric data solely for measuring student engagement. These changes aim to protect student privacy and ensure that disciplinary decisions are made more fairly and thoughtfully, rather than relying solely on potentially flawed automated evaluations.

→
Previous
Latest
S-4157.2 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5956 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education (originally sponsored by Senators Nobles, Wellman, Chapman, Frame, Hasegawa, Orwall, Salomon, Shewmake, Slatter, Valdez, and C.
S-3708.1 SENATE BILL 5956 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Nobles, Wellman, Chapman, Frame, Hasegawa, Orwall, Salomon, Shewmake, Slatter, Valdez, and C.
Wilson) READ FIRST TIME 01/23/26.
Wilson Prefiled 12/31/25.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education.
1 SSB 5956 instruction has issued guidance on human-centered artificial intelligence in education.
1 SB 5956 instruction has issued guidance on human-centered artificial intelligence in education.
2 SSB 5956 (a) Physical harm will be inflicted by the student upon the student's own person, as evidenced by threats or attempts to commit suicide, or inflict physical harm on oneself;
2 SB 5956 (a) Physical harm will be inflicted by the student upon the student's own person, as evidenced by threats or attempts to commit suicide, or inflict physical harm on oneself;
3 SSB 5956 (a) Use an automated decision system as the sole or determinative basis to generate a "risk score" or similar predictive classification for an individual student that purports to measure the student's likelihood of misconduct, gang affiliation, criminal behavior, targeted violence, or future disciplinary problems;
3 SB 5956 (a) Use an automated decision system to generate a "risk score" or similar predictive classification for an individual student that purports to measure the student's likelihood of misconduct, gang affiliation, criminal behavior, targeted violence, or future disciplinary problems;
or (b) Maintain internal lists or watchlists of students designated as likely perpetrators of violence or serious misconduct wholly based on an automated decision system.
or (b) Maintain internal lists or watchlists of students designated as likely perpetrators of violence or serious misconduct based in whole or in part on an automated decision system.
(2) A school district may not enter into any contract with a vendor or school service provider that requires or authorizes the vendor or school service provider to engage in the activities prohibited under subsection (1) of this section.
(2) A school district may not enter into any contract with a vendor or school service provider that requires or authorizes the vendor or provider to engage in the activities prohibited under subsection (1) of this section.
(b) Uses required by federal law, provided that such uses are narrowly limited to what federal law requires and are not used for student discipline-related decisions;
or (b) Uses required by federal law, provided that such uses are narrowly limited to what federal law requires and are not used for student discipline-related decisions.
or (c) The use of biometrics to determine student engagement when it is used solely for the purposes of informing educator professional development.
(2) Disclosures under this section must remain consistent with RCW 28A.600.475, 28A.605.030, and applicable federal law, including p.
(2) Disclosures under this section must remain consistent with RCW 28A.600.475, 28A.605.030, and applicable federal law, including the federal family educational rights and privacy act of 1974, 20 U.S.C.
4 SSB 5956 the federal family educational rights and privacy act of 1974, 20 U.S.C.
NEW SECTION.
p.
4 SB 5956 NEW SECTION.
(1) Nothing in this chapter or RCW 43.386.080 may be construed to limit or impair the authority of a school district, school, or employee or contractor of these entities to take corrective action or impose student discipline as authorized under state law.
(1) Nothing in this chapter or RCW 43.386.080 may be construed to limit or impair the authority of a school district, school, or employee to take corrective action or impose student discipline as authorized under state law.
(3) Nothing in this chapter or RCW 43.386.080 prohibits an educational service district, school district, school, or employee or contractor of these entities from gathering and analyzing nonbiometric information about a student's behavior with an automated decision system to determine a level of concern, which is used to develop and implement supportive interventions to promote positive behavior development and to promote a safe, supportive teaching and learning environment.
(2) A state or local government agency may not apply a facial recognition service to any individual based on their religious, p.
(2) A state or local government agency may not apply a facial recognition service to any individual based on their religious, political, or social views or activities, participation in a particular noncriminal organization or lawful event, or actual or perceived race, ethnicity, citizenship, place of origin, immigration status, age, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or other characteristic protected by law.
5 SSB 5956 political, or social views or activities, participation in a particular noncriminal organization or lawful event, or actual or perceived race, ethnicity, citizenship, place of origin, immigration status, age, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or other characteristic protected by law.
(4) A law enforcement agency that utilizes body worn camera recordings shall comply with the provisions of RCW 42.56.240(14).
p.
5 SB 5956 (4) A law enforcement agency that utilizes body worn camera recordings shall comply with the provisions of RCW 42.56.240(14).
During its regular review cycle, the office of the superintendent of public instruction shall, in consultation with students, families, educators, and communities disproportionately impacted by discipline and surveillance, update its guidance on human-centered artificial intelligence in K–12 education to reflect the prohibitions and requirements in chapter 28A.--- (the new chapter created in section 13 of this act) and to address the use of artificial intelligence p.
During its regular review cycle, the office of the superintendent of public instruction shall, in consultation with students, families, educators, and communities disproportionately impacted by discipline and surveillance, update its guidance on human-centered artificial intelligence in K–12 education to reflect the prohibitions and requirements in chapter 28A.--- (the new chapter created in section 13 of this act) and to address the use of artificial intelligence systems, automated decision systems, and school surveillance technologies in connection with student discipline-related decisions and school safety.
6 SSB 5956 systems, automated decision systems, and school surveillance technologies in connection with student discipline-related decisions and school safety.
(1) By February 1, 2027, the Washington state school directors' association must develop, and periodically update, a model policy and procedure that school districts, charter schools, and state-tribal education compact schools may adopt or adapt to reflect the prohibitions and implement the requirements in chapter 28A.--- (the new chapter created in section 13 of this act).
(1) By February 1, 2027, the Washington state school directors' association must develop a model policy and procedure that school districts, charter schools, and state-tribal education compact schools may adopt or adapt to implement the requirements in chapter 28A.--- (the new chapter created in section 13 of this act).
(2) The Washington state school directors' association must maintain the model policy and procedure on its website at no cost to school districts.
p.
6 SB 5956 (2) The Washington state school directors' association must maintain the model policy and procedure on its website at no cost to school districts.
(b) Strategies to avoid discriminatory or disproportionately harmful impacts on students with protected class status under chapters 49.60, 28A.640, and 28A.642 RCW;
(b) Strategies to avoid discriminatory or disproportionately harmful impacts on students with protected characteristics under chapters 49.60, 28A.640, and 28A.642 RCW;
p.
NEW SECTION.
7 SSB 5956 NEW SECTION.
8 SSB 5956
7 SB 5956
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  3. Minority; without recommendation.

  4. Minority; do not pass.

  5. ED - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  6. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Education at 4:00 PM.

  7. Public hearing in the House Committee on Education at 10:30 AM.

  8. First reading, referred to Education.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 35; nays, 13; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. 1st substitute bill substituted (EDU 26).

  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  13. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  14. Minority; without recommendation.

  15. EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education at 10:30 AM.

  17. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education at 10:30 AM.

  18. First reading, referred to Early Learning & K-12 Education.

  19. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (140)

140 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 140 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 35 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30000
Republican 51301
Total 351301
% of votes cast 71%27%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jeff Wilson Republican Nay
Jim McCune Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Not Voting
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Leonard Christian Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5956?
SB 5956 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), Vandana Slatter (Democrat), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Jesse Salomon (Democrat), Tina Orwall (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Noel Frame (Democrat), Mike Chapman (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), and Javier Valdez (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5956?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 31, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 5956?
Track SB 5956 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5956

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5956

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →