Concerning biosimilar medicines.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5594 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5594.
You're tracking SB 5594
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5594 — Concerning biosimilar medicines.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 30, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
306 added · 284 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 5594 made a critical change by focusing solely on biosimilar medicines, rather than also including "interchangeable biological products." This simplifies the bill and emphasizes the importance of making biosimilars more accessible to help lower prescription drug costs. The intent remains the same: to eliminate barriers that prevent patients from accessing these affordable alternatives, which could significantly reduce their medication expenses.
ENGROSSEDS-0988.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5594 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senate Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Harris, Cleveland, Hasegawa, and Shewmake)Shewmake READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/19/25.01/30/25.
ANReferred ACT Relating to reducingCommittee prescriptionon drugHealth costs& byLong- eliminatingTerm barriersCare. impeding access to biosimilar medicines and interchangeable biological products;
andAN amendingACT RCWRelating 48.43.420,to 41.05.410,reducing 69.41.120,prescription anddrug 69.41.125.costs by eliminating barriers impeding access to biosimilar medicines;
amending RCW 48.43.420, 41.05.410, 69.41.120, and 69.41.125;
and creating a new section.
NEW SECTION.
The legislature finds that increasing access to biosimilar medicines has the potential to significantly reduce prescription drug costs.
Biosimilar medicines are approved according to the same food and drug administration standards of pharmaceutical quality, safety, and efficacy as their reference medicines.
Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to eliminate barriers impeding access to biosimilar medicines and the savings they can provide.
Sec.
2.
(1) When coverage of a prescription drug for the treatment of any medical condition is subject to prescription drug utilization management, the patient and prescribing practitioner must have access top. a clear, readily accessible, and convenient process to request an exception through which the prescription drug utilization management can be overridden in favor of coverage of a prescription drug prescribed by a treating health care provider.
1 SB 5594 to a clear, readily accessible, and convenient process to request an exception through which the prescription drug utilization management can be overridden in favor of coverage of a prescription drug prescribed by a treating health care provider.
Approval criteria must be clearly posted on the health carrier and prescription drug p.utilization management entity's website.
1 ESSB 5594 utilization management entity's website.
or (e)p. The required prescription drug is not in the best interest of the patient, based on documentation of medical appropriateness, because the patient's use of the prescription drug is expected to:
2 SB 5594 (e) The required prescription drug is not in the best interest of the patient, based on documentation of medical appropriateness, because the patient's use of the prescription drug is expected to:
p.(4) Upon the granting of an exception, the health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity shall authorize coverage for the prescription drug prescribed by the patient's treating health care provider.
2 ESSB 5594 (4) Upon the granting of an exception, the health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity shall authorize coverage for the prescription drug prescribed by the patient's treating health care provider.
and (ii) Within one business day of receipt of sufficient information from the treating health care provider as disclosed under subsection (2) of this section, approve a request if the information provided meets at least one of the conditions referenced in subsection (3) of this section or if deemed medically appropriate, or deny a request if thep. requested service does not meet at least one of the conditions referenced in subsection (3) of this section.
3 SB 5594 the requested service does not meet at least one of the conditions referenced in subsection (3) of this section.
(d) For purposes of this subsection, exception requests are considered urgent when an enrollee is experiencing a health condition that may seriously jeopardize the enrollee's life, health, or ability p.to regain maximum function, or when an enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment using a nonformulary drug.
3 ESSB 5594 to regain maximum function, or when an enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment using a nonformulary drug.
(a) A health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity from requiring a patient to try an AB-rated generic equivalent or((or a biological product that isis)), an interchangeable biological productp. prior to providing coverage for the equivalent branded prescription drug;
(b)4 BeginningSB January5594 1,product, 2026, a health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity from requiring a patient to try a biosimilar prioras todefined providingunder coverage42 forU.S.C. the equivalent branded prescription drug;
(c) A health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity from denying an exception for a drug that has been removed p.
4 ESSB 5594 from the market due to safety concerns from the federal food and drug administration;
or (((c))) (d) A health care provider from prescribing a prescription drug that is determined to be medically appropriate.
2.262 (i)(2), prior to providing coverage for the equivalent branded prescription drug;
(b) A health carrier or prescription drug utilization management entity from denying an exception for a drug that has been removed from the market due to safety concerns from the federal food and drug administration;
or (c) A health care provider from prescribing a prescription drug that is determined to be medically appropriate.
Sec.
3.
(e)p. The qualified health plan must meet additional participation requirements to reduce barriers to maintaining and improving health and align to state agency value-based purchasing.
5 SB 5594 (e) The qualified health plan must meet additional participation requirements to reduce barriers to maintaining and improving health and align to state agency value-based purchasing.
p.care coordination and chronic disease management;
5 ESSB 5594 care coordination and chronic disease management;
(3)(a) At the request of the authority for monitoring, enforcement, or program and quality improvement activities, a qualified health plan offered under this section must provide cost and quality of care information and data to the authority, and may not enter into an agreement with a provider or third party that would restrictp. the qualified health plan from providing this information or data.
6 SB 5594 restrict the qualified health plan from providing this information or data.
p.(4) Nothing in this section prohibits a health carrier offering qualified health plans under this section from offering other health plans in the individual market.
Show all 68 changed lines (28 more)
6 ESSB 5594 (4) Nothing in this section prohibits a health carrier offering qualified health plans under this section from offering other health plans in the individual market.
3.4.
(3))) A pharmacist mayfilling substitute a therapeuticallyprescription equivalentorder drugfor ora interchangeabledrug biological product unlessprescribed otherwise instructed by theits practitionertrade throughor thebrand usename ofmay wordsselect "dispense as written," words of a similarbiosimilar meaning,as ordefined someunder other42 equivalentU.S.C. indication.
(2) If an oral prescription is involved, a pharmacist may substitute a therapeutically equivalent generic drug or interchangeable biological product in its place unless the practitioner or the practitioner's agent instructs the pharmacist not to substitute.
The pharmacist shall note the instructions on the file copy of the prescription.
p.
7 ESSB 5594 (3) The pharmacist shall note the manufacturer of the drug dispensed on the file copy of a written or oral prescription, unless this information is maintained in a separate record that is readily retrievable by the pharmacist.
(4) The pharmacist shall retain the file copy of a written or oral prescription for the same period of time specified in RCW 18.64.245 for retention of prescription records.
4.262 (i)(2), or interchangeable biological product.
(2) In no case shall a selection be made under this section if the practitioner personally indicates, either orally or in the practitioner's own handwriting, "do not substitute," "dispense as p.
7 SB 5594 written," or words of similar meaning.
Nothing in this subsection prohibits a practitioner from checking a box on a prescription marked "do not substitute" if the practitioner personally initials the box or checkmark.
(3)(a) Selection under this section is within the discretion of the pharmacist, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section.
The person who selects the drug product to be dispensed under this section assumes the same responsibility for selecting the dispensed drug product as would be incurred in filling a prescription for a drug product prescribed by generic name.
There shall be no liability on the practitioner for an act or omission by a pharmacist in selecting, preparing, or dispensing a drug product under this section.
In no case shall the pharmacist select a drug product under this section unless the drug product selected costs the patient less than the prescribed drug product.
(b) For the purposes of this subsection, "cost" includes any professional fee that may be charged by the pharmacist.
(4) When a substitution is made under this section, the intent of the substitution should be to provide a product with a lower out-of- pocket cost to the patient.
The drug product dispensed must be communicated to the patient with the name of the dispensed drug product indicated on the prescription label.
(5) The pharmacist shall note the manufacturer of the drug dispensed on the file copy of a written or oral prescription.
(((4))) (6) The pharmacist shall retain the file copy of a written or oral prescription for the same period of time specified in RCW 18.64.245 for retention of prescription records.
Sec.
5.
Unless the prescribed biological product is requested by the patient or the patient's representative, ((if "substitution permitted" is marked on the prescription as provided in RCW 69.41.120)) or the prescriber has indicated substitution"do is not permittedsubstitute," inor accordancewords withof RCWsimilar 69.41.120,meaning, the pharmacist ((must))must may substitute an((an)) interchangeablea biologicalbiosimilar productas thatdefined heunder or42 sheU.S.C. has in stock for the biological product prescribed if the ((wholesale price for the interchangeable biological product to the pharmacist is less than the wholesale price)) consumer's out-of-pocket cost for the interchangeable biological product is less than the consumer's out- of-pocket cost for the biological product prescribed.
Sec.
262 (i)(2) or interchangeable biological product that he or she has in stock for the biological product prescribed if the wholesale price for the p.
8 SB 5594 biosimilar or interchangeable biological product to the pharmacist is less than the wholesale price for the biological product prescribed.
89 ESSBSB 5594
Show all 68 changed rows (28 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Second Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
HCW - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 8:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Returned to second reading for amendment.
-
Rules suspended.
-
Placed on third reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 1:30 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (HLTC 25).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
HLTC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Health & Long-Term Care.
Sponsors
- Sharon Shewmake · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Annette Cleveland · Cosponsor
- Paul Harris · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Paul Harris Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Sharon Shewmake Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Annette Cleveland Democrat
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5594?
- SB 5594 is sponsored by Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Annette Cleveland (Democrat), and Paul Harris (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 5594?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 30, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 5594?
- Track SB 5594 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5594
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5594
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →