SB 5972 — Expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 05, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of SB 5972, the language has been changed from "expanding the definition of uniformed" to "expanding the definition of law enforcement." This adjustment broadens the scope of the bill to include more categories of law enforcement personnel, which is important for ensuring that various roles in law enforcement receive the recognition and support they need. This change could impact funding, training, and resources available to a wider range of law enforcement officers.
S-4039.2S-3718.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5972 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Stanford, Conway, and Hasegawa)Hasegawa READPrefiled FIRST01/05/26. TIME 01/26/26.
ANRead ACTfirst Relatingtime to01/12/26. expanding the definition of uniformed personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration;
Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.
AN ACT Relating to expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration;
1 SSBSB 5972 negotiations on personnel matters, including wages, hours, and working conditions, which may be peculiar to an appropriate bargaining unit of such public employer, except that by such obligation neither party shall be compelled to agree to a proposal or be required to make a concession unless otherwise provided in this chapter.
2 SSBSB 5972 (ii) For department of labor and industries authorized medical and vocational providers who provided these services on or after January 1, 2019;
3 SSBSB 5972 or town, law enforcement officers employed by the governing body of any county, and law enforcement officers employed by the governing body of a municipal airport operating under the provisions of chapter 14.08 RCW;
4 SSBSB 5972
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 1:30 PM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
LAWS - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 34; nays, 15; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LC 26).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Derek Stanford Democrat
Co-sponsors (2)
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Steve Conway Democrat
Not signed on (148)
148 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 148 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5972?
- SB 5972 is sponsored by Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), and Derek Stanford (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5972?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 05, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 5972?
- Track SB 5972 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5972
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5972
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →