Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 5 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 5395 — Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorization determination process.

Last action — Effective date 6/11/2026*.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Bob Ferguson (Democratic) on March 23, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

842 added · 904 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 5395 introduces measures to enhance transparency and ethical standards in healthcare decision-making, particularly when artificial intelligence (AI) is involved. It now specifies that when AI is used, necessary standards must be established to prevent inappropriate determinations. Additionally, it adds requirements for insurance carriers to clearly identify the healthcare professional responsible for prior authorization decisions and to provide their qualifications in notifications sent to patients and healthcare providers. These changes aim to increase accountability in healthcare decisions and ensure that patients receive care based on qualified human oversight.

→
Previous
Latest
S-1767.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senate Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Orwall, Muzzall, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, and Slatter) READ FIRST TIME 02/21/25.
S-0690.1 SENATE BILL 5395 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Orwall, Muzzall, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, and Slatter Read first time 01/21/25.
Referred to Committee on Health & Long- Term Care.
1 SSB 5395 necessary.
1 SB 5395 necessary.
If artificial intelligence is used to aid in the decision- making process, standards must be put in place to ensure artificial intelligence is not used to make inappropriate determinations that could impact the health of an enrollee.
If artificial intelligence tools are used to aid in the decision-making process, standards must be put in place to ensure these tools are not used to make inappropriate determinations that could impact the health of an enrollee.
2 SSB 5395 (i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make a determination.
2 SB 5395 (i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make a determination.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the carrier shall include the credentials, board certifications, and p.
(((2))) (e) When issuing a notification for a prior authorization determination, the carrier and any contracted health care benefit p.
3 SSB 5395 areas of specialty expertise and training of the provider who had clinical oversight over the determination in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
3 SB 5395 manager shall include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
(2)(a) Carriers maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior authorization requirements.
The carrier must also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, beginning August 1, 2025, new application of prior authorization for health care services or prescription drugs can only be made quarterly and go into effect either January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, or October 1st of any given calendar year.
(f) In the case of an adverse benefit determination, a carrier shall make available to the requesting provider a peer-to-peer review discussion.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers at least 45 days prior to the quarterly update and must be available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
The peer reviewer provided by the carrier must possess a current and valid nonrestricted license to practice medicine in Washington state and must be knowledgeable of and have experience providing the same or similar service as the health care service under review, and must have authority to modify or overturn the care determination decision.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided in a single location on the carrier's website.
(2) Carriers maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior authorization requirements.
The notification must be provided independent of other policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Beginning August 1, 2025, these adjustments can only be made once annually and go into effect January 1st of any given calendar year.
(b) Adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of prior authorization requirements to reflect new evidence for health care services or prescription drugs including nationally recognized standards of care that are publicly available, consensus guidelines of nonprofit health care provider professional associations, nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines that are publicly available, guidelines or recommendations of federal government agencies including federal food and drug administration approvals, or state or national public health emergencies may be made at any time.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers at least four months prior to the January 1st effective date.
Notification of adjustments made under this subsection must be provided to all in-network providers as soon as possible and must be available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
The notification must be provided independent to other policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided in a single location on the carrier's website referenced in (a) of this subsection.
(3)(a) A determination of medical necessity shall be made only by a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice.
Carriers may remove prior authorization requirements at any time.
The licensed physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior authorization request based on medical necessity.
An artificial intelligence, algorithm, or related software tool shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
The licensed physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the p.
(b) A carrier and any contracted health care benefit manager that uses an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses an p.
4 SSB 5395 requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
4 SB 5395 artificial intelligence, algorithm, or related software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
(i) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
Algorithms may be used to process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical necessity.
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history;
(b) A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
and (C) Other relevant clinical information contained in the enrollee's medical or other clinical record;
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including demographic data;
(ii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
and (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
(iii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's criteria and guidelines complies with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is open to audit by the office of the insurance commissioner;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(vii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed to maximize accuracy and reliability;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial intelligence are open to audit by the office of the insurance commissioner under chapter 48.37 RCW;
and (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C.
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed by the carrier to maximize accuracy and reliability;
and (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health p.
5 SSB 5395 insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C.
(4)(a) Each carrier shall build and maintain a prior authorization application programming interface that automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a prior authorization is required for health care services, identify prior authorization information and documentation requirements, and facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and determinations from its electronic health records or practice management system.
(4)(a) Each carrier shall build and maintain a prior authorization application programming interface that automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a prior authorization is required for health care services, identify prior authorization information and documentation requirements, and facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and p.
5 SB 5395 determinations from its electronic health records or practice management system.
and (v) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a service less intensive than that included in the original request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
((and)) (v) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a service less intensive than that included in the original request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535;
and (vi) Include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
The carrier and any contracted health care benefit manager must also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
6 SSB 5395 (ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and determinations from its electronic health records or practice management system, and may include the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
6 SB 5395 (ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and determinations from its electronic health records or practice management system, and may include the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
7 SSB 5395 the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards for development of application programming interfaces and interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization functions.
7 SB 5395 the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards for development of application programming interfaces and interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization functions.
Show all 195 changed rows (155 more)
Previous
Latest
(((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(((4))) (6) For the purposes of this section:
(7) The commissioner may adopt any rules necessary to implement this section.
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, content generation, and forecasting future outcomes.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content generation.
"Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial intelligence.
or (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to p.
or (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request;
8 SSB 5395 severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request;
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content based on a foundation model.
(((b))) (c) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of p.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy without explicit programming.
8 SB 5395 the enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is not required to be expedited.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is not required to be expedited.
p.
(ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the managed care organization shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make a determination.
9 SSB 5395 (ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the managed care organization shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make a determination.
(b) The managed care organization shall meet the following time frames for prior authorization determinations and notifications to a participating provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request through a process other than an electronic prior authorization process described in subsection (((2))) (6) of this section:
(b) The managed care organization shall meet the following time frames for prior authorization determinations and notifications to a participating provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request through a process other than an electronic p.
9 SB 5395 prior authorization process described in subsection (((2))) (6) of this section:
(c) In any instance in which a managed care organization has determined that a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a managed care organization may establish a specific p.
(c) In any instance in which a managed care organization has determined that a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a managed care organization may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission of the additional information.
10 SSB 5395 reasonable time frame for submission of the additional information.
The clinical review criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of color, gender, and underserved populations.
The clinical review criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical criteria with p.
10 SB 5395 respect to black and indigenous people, other people of color, gender, and underserved populations.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the managed care organization shall include the credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training of the provider who had clinical oversight over the determination in any notification sent to the managed care enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(((2))) (e) When issuing a notification for a prior authorization determination, the managed care organization and any contracted health care benefit manager shall include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
(2)(a) Managed care organizations maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior authorization requirements.
The managed care organization shall also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the managed care enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, beginning August 1, 2025, new application of prior authorization for health care services or prescription drugs can only be made quarterly and go into effect either January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, or October 1st of any given calendar year.
(f) In the case of an adverse benefit determination, a managed care organization shall make available to the requesting provider a peer-to-peer review discussion.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
The peer reviewer provided by the managed care organization must possess a current and valid nonrestricted license to practice medicine in Washington state and must be knowledgeable of and have experience providing the same or similar service as the health care service under review, and must have authority to modify or overturn the care determination decision.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided at least 45 days prior to the quarterly update and must be available to providers in a single location on the managed care organization's website.
(2) Managed care organizations maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior authorization requirements.
The notification must be provided independent of other policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Beginning August 1, 2025, these adjustments can only be made once annually and go into effect January 1st of any given calendar year.
p.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers at least four months prior to the January 1st effective date.
11 SSB 5395 (b) Adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of prior authorization requirements to reflect new evidence for health care services or prescription drugs including nationally recognized standards of care that are publicly available, consensus guidelines of nonprofit health care provider professional associations, nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines that are publicly available, guidelines or recommendations of federal government agencies including federal food and drug administration approvals, or state or national public health emergencies may be made at any time.
The notification must be provided independent to other policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Notification of adjustments made under this subsection must be provided to all in-network providers as soon as possible and must be available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
(3)(a) A determination of medical necessity shall be made only by a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided in a single location on the managed care organization's website referenced in (a) of this subsection.
Managed care organizations may remove prior authorization requirements at any time.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior authorization request based on medical necessity.
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
An artificial intelligence, p.
Algorithms may be used to process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical necessity.
11 SB 5395 algorithm, or related software tool shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
(b) A managed care organization that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(b) A managed care organization and any contracted health care benefit manager that uses an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or related software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
(i) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
p.
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history;
12 SSB 5395 (A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including demographic data;
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
and (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
and (C) Other relevant clinical information contained in the enrollee's medical or other clinical record;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
(ii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(iii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's criteria and guidelines complies with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(v) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial intelligence are open to audit by the authority consistent with RCW 74.09.200;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is open to audit by the authority consistent with RCW 74.09.200;
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed by the managed care organization to maximize accuracy and reliability;
(vii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed to maximize accuracy and reliability;
and (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C.
and (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health p.
12 SB 5395 insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C.
Managed care organizations shall indicate the percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial intelligence and the percent of care determinations made after the emergent and nonemergent authorization request turnaround times listed in subsection (1) of this section.
Managed care organizations shall indicate the percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial intelligence tools and algorithms and the percent of care determinations made after the emergent and nonemergent authorization request turnaround times stated above.
(c) The authority shall publish on its website the results of each managed care organization's report 45 days after submission, p.
(c) The authority shall publish on its website the results of each managed care organization's report 45 days after submission, along with their own prior authorization statistics for fee-for- service medicaid enrollees.
13 SSB 5395 along with their own prior authorization statistics for fee-for- service medicaid enrollees.
(5) By July 1, 2027, the authority shall determine which treatments, prescription drugs, and services, along with their applicable billing codes, do not require prior authorization by managed care organizations for any medicaid enrollee.
(5) By July 1, 2027, the authority shall publish a list of treatments, prescription drugs, equipment, and services, along with their applicable billing codes, that specifies under which circumstances prior authorization is required, prohibited, or has other uniform application across the medical assistance program under this chapter.
The authority must consider applicable state and federal program integrity regulations when deciding which services they will waive prior authorization requirements.
The authority must consider applicable state and federal laws when deciding which services are not subject to prior authorization.
The authority shall focus on existing prior authorization requirements and treatments, prescription drugs, equipment, and services that are treated inconsistently in the medical assistance program.
The authority shall update the list at least annually and provide notice and an opportunity for public comment prior to finalizing the list.
Nothing in this subsection alters existing obligations of the authority and managed care organizations to ensure enrollee access to treatments, prescription drugs, equipment, and services that are not included in the list.
Nothing in this section prohibits the authority and managed care organizations from applying other utilization management strategies, consistent with state and federal law, for services for which prior authorization is not required.
(ii) Automate the process to determine whether a prior authorization is required for durable medical equipment or a health care service;
(iii) Allow providers to query the managed care organization's prior authorization documentation requirements;
14 SSB 5395 (iv) Support an automated approach using nonproprietary open workflows to compile and exchange the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
13 SB 5395 (ii) Automate the process to determine whether a prior authorization is required for durable medical equipment or a health care service;
(iii) Allow providers to query the managed care organization's prior authorization documentation requirements;
(iv) Support an automated approach using nonproprietary open workflows to compile and exchange the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
and (iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a drug other than the one included in the original prior authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the managed care organization's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
((and)) (iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a drug other than the one included in the original prior authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the managed care organization's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535;
and (iv) Include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
The managed care organization p.
14 SB 5395 and any contracted health care benefit manager must also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the managed care enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(d)(i) If a managed care organization determines that it will not be able to satisfy the requirements of (a) of this subsection by p.
(d)(i) If a managed care organization determines that it will not be able to satisfy the requirements of (a) of this subsection by January 1, 2025, the managed care organization shall submit a narrative justification to the authority on or before September 1, 2024, describing:
15 SSB 5395 January 1, 2025, the managed care organization shall submit a narrative justification to the authority on or before September 1, 2024, describing:
(((3))) (7) This section applies to prior authorization functions carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(((3))) (7) Nothing in this section applies to prior authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 71.24.618 or 74.09.490.
(8) The authority may adopt any rules necessary to implement this section.
(((4))) (8) For the purposes of this section:
(9) Nothing in this section applies to prior authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 71.24.618 or 74.09.490.
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as p.
(((4))) (10) For the purposes of this section:
15 SB 5395 computer vision, speech or natural language processing, content generation, and forecasting future outcomes.
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content generation.
"Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial intelligence.
p.
(B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain maximum function;
16 SSB 5395 (B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain maximum function;
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content based on a foundation model.
(((b))) (c) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is not required to be expedited.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy without explicit programming.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is not required to be expedited.
If insufficient information has been provided to the health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall p.
If insufficient information has been p.
17 SSB 5395 request any additional information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization request.
16 SB 5395 provided to the health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any additional information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization request.
18 SSB 5395 (c) In any instance in which the health plan has determined that a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, the health plan may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission of the additional information.
17 SB 5395 (c) In any instance in which the health plan has determined that a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, the health plan may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission of the additional information.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the health plan shall include the credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training of the provider who had clinical oversight over the determination in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(((2))) (e) When issuing a notification for a prior authorization determination, the health plan and any contracted health care benefit manager shall include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
(2)(a) Health plans maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior authorization requirements.
The health plan shall also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, beginning August 1, 2025, new application of prior authorization for health care services or prescription drugs can only be made quarterly and go into effect either January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, or October 1st of any given calendar year.
(f) In the case of an adverse benefit determination, a health plan shall make available to the requesting provider a peer-to-peer review discussion.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers at least 45 days prior to the quarterly update and must be available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
The peer reviewer provided by the health plan must possess a current and valid nonrestricted license to practice medicine in Washington state and must be knowledgeable of and have experience providing the same or similar service as the health care service under review, and must have authority to modify or overturn the care determination decision.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided in a single location on the health plan's website.
(2) Health plans maintain the ability to make adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of their prior p.
The notification must be provided independent of other p.
18 SB 5395 authorization requirements.
19 SSB 5395 policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Beginning August 1, 2025, these adjustments can only be made once annually and go into effect January 1st of any given calendar year.
(b) Adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability of prior authorization requirements to reflect new evidence for health care services or prescription drugs including nationally recognized standards of care that are publicly available, consensus guidelines of nonprofit health care provider professional associations, nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines that are publicly available, guidelines or recommendations of federal government agencies including federal food and drug administration approvals, or state or national public health emergencies may be made at any time.
Notification of policy changes must be provided to all in-network providers at least four months prior to the January 1st effective date.
Notification of adjustments made under this subsection must be provided to all in-network providers as soon as possible and must be available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system or application programming interface system.
The notification must be provided independent to other policy changes or provider notification publications and be easily accessible in electronic provider and enrollee portals.
Until January 1, 2028, this information must also be provided in a single location on the health plan's website referenced in (a) of this subsection.
(3)(a) A determination of medical necessity shall be made only by a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice.
Health plans may remove prior authorization requirements at any time.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior authorization request based on medical necessity.
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
An artificial intelligence, algorithm, or related software tool shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.
Algorithms may be used to process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical necessity.
(b) A health plan and any contracted health care benefit manager that uses an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or related software tool for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(b) A health plan that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(i) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the following information, as applicable:
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history;
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
and (C) Other relevant clinical information contained in the enrollee's medical or other clinical record;
(ii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
(iii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's criteria and guidelines complies with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
20 SSB 5395 (A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including demographic data;
19 SB 5395 (iv) The use of the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
and (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting provider;
(v) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination solely on a group data set;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool is open to audit by the office of the insurance commissioner;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(vii) The artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed to maximize accuracy and reliability;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in violation of state or federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial intelligence is open to audit by the office of the insurance commissioner;
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and outcomes are periodically reviewed by the health plan to maximize accuracy and reliability;
p.
(ii) Automate the process to determine whether a prior authorization is required for durable medical equipment or a health care service;
21 SSB 5395 (ii) Automate the process to determine whether a prior authorization is required for durable medical equipment or a health care service;
(iv) Support an automated approach using nonproprietary open workflows to compile and exchange the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
(iv) Support an automated approach using nonproprietary open workflows to compile and exchange the necessary data elements to populate the prior authorization requirements that are compliant with the federal health insurance portability and accountability act of p.
and (v) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a service less intensive than that included in the original request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
20 SB 5395 1996 or have an exception from the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services;
((and)) (v) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a service less intensive than that included in the original request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535;
and (vi) Include a unique identifier for the individual who initially reviewed and made the determination.
The health plan and any contracted health care benefit manager must also include the national provider identification number of the physician who had clinical oversight for the determination as well as the physician's credentials, board certifications, and areas of specialty expertise and training in any notification sent to the health plan enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
p.
(c) If federal rules related to standards for using an application programming interface to communicate prior authorization p.
22 SSB 5395 (c) If federal rules related to standards for using an application programming interface to communicate prior authorization status to providers are not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services by September 13, 2023, the requirements of (a) of this subsection may not be enforced until January 1, 2026.
21 SB 5395 status to providers are not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services by September 13, 2023, the requirements of (a) of this subsection may not be enforced until January 1, 2026.
(((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(((4))) (6) For the purposes of this section:
(7) The authority may adopt any rules necessary to implement this section.
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, content generation, and forecasting future outcomes.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where:
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content generation.
"Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial intelligence.
p.
23 SSB 5395 (b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where:
or (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request;
or p.
22 SB 5395 (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request;
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content based on a foundation model.
(((b))) (c) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the enrollee obtaining a health care service that is not required to be expedited.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy without explicit programming.
(((5))) (7) This section shall not apply to coverage provided under the medicare part C or part D programs set forth in Title XVIII of the social security act of 1965, as amended.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a provider or facility for approval of a health care service or prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the enrollee obtaining a health care service that is not required to be expedited.
(((5))) (9) This section shall not apply to coverage provided under the medicare part C or part D programs set forth in Title XVIII of the social security act of 1965, as amended.
(1) A health carrier that offers a health plan shall not retrospectively deny coverage or retrospectively modify to a service less intensive than that included in the original request for emergency and nonemergency care that had prior authorization, including for medical necessity, under the plan's written policies at the time the care was rendered, unless:
(1) A health carrier that offers a health plan shall not retrospectively deny coverage for emergency and nonemergency care that had prior authorization under the plan's written policies at the time the care was rendered.
(a) The prior authorization was based upon a material misrepresentation by the provider, facility, or covered person;
(2) Retrospective denials shall not be considered adverse benefit determinations and will not be required to follow the standard appeals processes in RCW 48.43.525 or any carrier policies related to their own grievance and appeals process.
or p.
24 SSB 5395 (b) The underlying health plan coverage is lawfully rescinded, canceled, or terminated retrospectively through the date of service.
(2) Retrospective denials of services with prior authorization or retrospective modification to less intensive services due to a change in the carrier's determination of medical necessity are prohibited, shall not be considered adverse benefit determinations, and will not be required to follow the standard appeals processes in RCW 48.43.530 or any carrier policies related to their own grievance and appeals process.
Interest will be assessed on the associated claim submitted by the provider at the rate of one percent per month, retroactive to the date of service.
Interest will be assessed on the associated claim at the rate of one percent per month, retroactive to the original date of the authorization request.
(1) By ((October 1, 2020,)) January 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, for individual and group health plans issued by a carrier that has written at least one percent of the total accident and health insurance premiums written by all companies authorized to offer accident and health insurance in Washington in the most recently available year, the carrier shall report to the commissioner the following aggregated and deidentified data related to the carrier's prior authorization practices and experience for the prior plan year:
(1) By ((October 1, 2020,)) January 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, for individual and group health plans issued by a carrier p.
23 SB 5395 that has written at least one percent of the total accident and health insurance premiums written by all companies authorized to offer accident and health insurance in Washington in the most recently available year, the carrier shall report to the commissioner the following aggregated and deidentified data related to the carrier's prior authorization practices and experience for the prior plan ((year)) quarter:
The carrier must report these totals separately for approvals or denials made by the carrier directly and for approvals or denials made by a health care benefit manager as defined in RCW 48.200.020 that is delegated to make prior authorization determinations either directly or indirectly on behalf of the carrier.
The carrier must report these totals by both health plan and each health care benefit manager as defined in RCW 48.200.020 that is delegated to provide care determinations on behalf of the carrier.
(i) The percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial intelligence;
(i) The percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial intelligence tools and algorithms;
p.
and (ii) The percent of care determinations made after the emergent and nonemergent authorization request turnaround times stated in RCW 48.43.830;
25 SSB 5395 (ii) The percent of prior authorization determinations made after the standard and expedited authorization request turnaround times stated in RCW 48.43.830;
and (iii) The total number of nonelectronic standard and nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests;
and (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then subsequently approved for each code;
and p.
24 SB 5395 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then subsequently approved for each code;
p.
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
26 SSB 5395 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
p.
25 SB 5395 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
p.
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
27 SSB 5395 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved requests for each code;
and (((h))) (i) The average determination response time in hours for prior authorization requests to the carrier in total reported under (a) of this subsection and with respect to each code reported under (((a))) (b) through (((f))) (h) of this subsection for each of the following categories of prior authorization:
and (((h))) (i) The average determination response time in hours for prior authorization requests to the carrier in total reported under p.
26 SB 5395 (a) of this subsection and with respect to each code reported under (((a))) (b) through (((f))) (h) of this subsection for each of the following categories of prior authorization:
p.
(b) The report must contain trend data for total authorization requests, approvals, and denials by plan and health care benefit managers.
28 SSB 5395 (b) The report must contain trend data for total authorization requests, approvals, and denials by plan and health care benefit managers.
29 SSB 5395
27 SB 5395
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/11/2026*.

  2. Chapter 157, 2026 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 94; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 4.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted with no other amendments.

  12. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  13. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  14. APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Health Care & Wellness.

  15. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  16. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  17. Referred to Appropriations.

  18. Minority; without recommendation.

  19. HCW - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  20. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 1:30 PM.

  21. Public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 1:30 PM.

  22. First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.

  23. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  24. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  25. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  26. 2nd substitute bill substituted (WM 26).

  27. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  28. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  29. Minority; without recommendation.

  30. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  31. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 4:00 PM.

  32. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  33. Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  34. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  35. Referred to Ways & Means.

  36. Minority; without recommendation.

  37. And refer to Ways & Means.

  38. HLTC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  39. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care at 8:00 AM.

  40. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care at 8:00 AM.

  41. First reading, referred to Health & Long-Term Care.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30000
Republican 19000
Total 49000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 94 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 37001
Democrat 57003
Total 94004
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Adam Bernbaum Democrat Yea
Adison Richards Democrat Yea
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Not Voting
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Brianna Thomas Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Not Voting
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Edwin Obras Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Janice Zahn Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Lisa Parshley Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Natasha Hill Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Osman Salahuddin Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shaun Scott Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Not Voting
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Zach Hall Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Andrew Engell Republican Yea
April Connors Republican Yea
Brian Burnett Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
David Stuebe Republican Yea
Deb Manjarrez Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Not Voting
Gloria Mendoza Republican Yea
Hunter Abell Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
John Ley Republican Yea
Joshua Penner Republican Yea
Kevin Waters Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Marshall Republican Yea
Michael Keaton Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Sam Low Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Stephanie Barnard Republican Yea
Stephanie McClintock Republican Yea
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea
Travis Couture Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30000
Republican 18100
Total 48100
% of votes cast 98%2%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5395?
SB 5395 is sponsored by Vandana Slatter (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Ron Muzzall (Republican), and Tina Orwall (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5395?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5395?
Track SB 5395 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5395

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5395

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →