Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: In Committee 20 D cosponsors

HB 1137 — Establishing uniform policies and procedures within department of corrections facilities relating to disciplinary proceedings and administrative segregation.

Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 27, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 20 sponsors

    1 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (20 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 96 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 1137 now specifies the situations that can lead to administrative segregation in a more straightforward manner. Notably, it eliminates references to "disciplinary proceedings" and narrows the criteria to focus solely on serious offenses like escape, arson, and major disturbances. The change is significant because it clarifies when administrative segregation can be applied, potentially introducing greater consistency in its use and ensuring that it is reserved for the most serious situations.

→
Previous
Latest
H-0825.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1137 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Community Safety (originally sponsored by Representatives Peterson, Gregerson, Berry, Alvarado, Macri, Cortes, Callan, Ryu, Farivar, Doglio, Ortiz-Self, Simmons, Street, Pollet, Kloba, Nance, Berg, Ormsby, Lekanoff, and Hill) READ FIRST TIME 01/27/25.
H-0115.1 HOUSE BILL 1137 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Representatives Peterson, Gregerson, Berry, Alvarado, Macri, Cortes, Callan, Ryu, Farivar, Doglio, Ortiz-Self, Simmons, Street, Pollet, Kloba, Nance, Berg, Ormsby, Lekanoff, and Hill Prefiled 12/27/24.
Read first time 01/13/25.
Referred to Committee on Community Safety.
1 SHB 1137 inmate that is based on, or arises from, injury to the correctional officer or department employee caused by the inmate while the correctional officer or department employee was acting in the course and scope of his or her employment.
1 HB 1137 inmate that is based on, or arises from, injury to the correctional officer or department employee caused by the inmate while the correctional officer or department employee was acting in the course and scope of his or her employment.
2 SHB 1137 (15) "Indigent inmate," "indigent," and "indigency" mean an inmate who has less than a $25 balance of disposable income in his or her institutional account on the day a request is made to utilize funds and during the 30 days previous to the request.
2 HB 1137 (15) "Indigent inmate," "indigent," and "indigency" mean an inmate who has less than a $25 balance of disposable income in his or her institutional account on the day a request is made to utilize funds and during the 30 days previous to the request.
3 SHB 1137 (c) Guide an ((offender)) incarcerated person from one location to another.
3 HB 1137 (c) Guide an ((offender)) incarcerated person from one location to another.
4 SHB 1137 leaves the correctional facility to the time of arrival at the other location, and includes the escorting of the pregnant incarcerated ((woman or youth)) person from the correctional facility to a transport vehicle and from the vehicle to the other location.
4 HB 1137 leaves the correctional facility to the time of arrival at the other location, and includes the escorting of the pregnant incarcerated ((woman or youth)) person from the correctional facility to a transport vehicle and from the vehicle to the other location.
(1) The circumstances or actions that may warrant administrative segregation in response to suspected prohibited conduct or disciplinary proceedings include the following:
(1) The circumstances warranting administrative segregation include the following:
(c) Assault resulting in serious physical injury or attempted assault that would have resulted in serious physical injury, including assault of department staff;
(c) Serious assault or attempted serious assault;
and (e) Reliable and specific intelligence that one of these events is likely and imminent unless particular individuals are removed from the general population.
(e) Reliable and specific intelligence that one of these events is likely and imminent unless particular individuals are removed from the general population;
and (f) Protective custody.
5 SHB 1137 (2) Medical necessity may justify placing an individual temporarily in close observation areas or infirmaries under medical supervision but does not justify administrative segregation status.
5 HB 1137 (2) Medical necessity may justify placing an individual temporarily in close observation areas or infirmaries under medical supervision but does not justify administrative segregation status.
(3) The department will evaluate its practices and policies for administrative segregation with a goal of reducing placement to 15 days or less.
(3) Administrative segregation may not exceed 15 days unless a request for exception is reviewed and approved by the superintendent or designee.
(a) If administrative segregation is extended past 30 calendar days, the department will update the individual on their status and the reasons for extended placement.
(a) Extensions beyond 30 days require authorization by the deputy secretary, and extensions beyond 45 days require authorization by the secretary.
(b) Extensions of administrative segregation beyond 45 calendar days require authorization by the secretary or designee and a written explanation as to why the extension is needed.
(b) The department must notify the office of the corrections ombuds in writing any time a person has remained on administrative segregation for more than 45 consecutive days.
(c) The department must notify the office of the corrections ombuds in writing any time a person has remained on administrative segregation for more than 45 consecutive days.
(4) An incarcerated person may not lose housing, education, or work assignments, or other programming assignments solely due to placement on administrative segregation unless documented institutional needs require such removal or change.
(4) An incarcerated person may not lose housing, education, or work assignments, or other programming assignments solely due to placement on administrative segregation unless documented institutional or programmatic needs require such removal or change.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
4.
A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:
p.
6 SHB 1137 By January 31, 2026, and by January 31 every year thereafter, the department must post on its website an annual report on its use of administrative segregation.
That report shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) The total number of administrative segregation placements during the prior year;
(2) The number of administrative segregation placements during the prior year due to suspected prohibited behavior or the disciplinary process;
(3) The number of administrative segregation placements during the prior year for each of the following reasons:
(a) Threat to safety and security of others;
(b) Threat to orderliness of the facility;
(c) Housing assignment refusal;
(d) Contraband;
or (e) Other;
(4) The number of temporary administrative segregation placements during the prior year for each of the following nondisciplinary reasons:
(a) Medical hold;
(b) Transport or classification delay;
or (c) Protective custody;
(5)(a) The mean and median length of an individual's stay in administrative segregation during the prior year;
and (b) If the median length of stay is more than 15 days, any steps the department has taken in the prior year to decrease that length of stay and what, if any, additional resources are needed in order to achieve its goal of 15 days or less in administrative segregation;
(6) If the circumstances that led to an administrative segregation placement that the department reported under subsection (3)(a) of this section involved conduct by an incarcerated individual and a victim or attempted victim, the report shall also include whether the victim or attempted victim was a department employee or staff or an incarcerated individual and whether medical aid was provided or required.
7 SHB 1137
6 HB 1137
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  2. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 4:00 PM.

  3. Referred to Appropriations.

  4. CS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  5. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Community Safety at 8:00 AM.

  6. Public hearing in the House Committee on Community Safety at 4:00 PM.

  7. First reading, referred to Community Safety.

  8. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (19)

Not signed on (131)

131 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 131 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1137?
HB 1137 is sponsored by Natasha Hill (Democrat), Debra Lekanoff (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), April Berg (Democrat), Greg Nance (Democrat), Shelley Kloba (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Chipalo Street (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Darya Farivar (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Lisa Callan (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Emily Alvarado (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), and Julio Cortes (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1137?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 27, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 1137?
Track HB 1137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1137

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1137

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →