HB 1816 — Concerning civilian-staffed crisis response teams.
Last action — Referred to Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 04, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
14 sponsors
1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (13 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
167 added · 171 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 1816 allows cities with populations over 500,000 to create their own crisis response teams, expanding the previous proposal that applied to cities with populations over 200,000. This change is significant because it targets larger cities, potentially improving emergency responses for individuals in crisis without involving law enforcement. The bill specifies situations where these teams can respond directly to 911 calls, ensuring that appropriate help is provided in lower-risk scenarios. Overall, this aims to better address community needs while reducing police involvement in non-violent situations.
H-1486.1H-1089.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1816 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans (originally sponsored by Representatives Scott, Parshley, Farivar, Dufault, Fitzgibbon, Davis, Goodman, Obras, Taylor, Pollet, Nance, Ryu, Hill, and Cortes)Cortes READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/20/25.02/04/25.
Referred to Committee on Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans.
(1) A politicalcity subdivision with a population of more than 200,000500,000 residents may establish and maintain a civilian-staffed crisis response team operating outside of a general authority Washington law enforcement agencyagency. to support the political subdivision's goal of providing a nonlaw enforcement response to individuals in crisis, in need of a safety and welfare check, or a request for resources, whenever such a response is appropriate.
(2) The crisis response team is authorized to serve as athe primary response to 911 calls or on-view events when there is no report of active or imminent violence or possession of weapons and when the calls or events are regarding:
(3) For calls not included in subsection (2) of this section, the crisis response team may also serve as a secondary response in p.
1 HB 1816 support of a law enforcement response as determined by the executive head of the city.
(4) The executive head of the city will set minimum qualifications for crisis responders that must include training in scene safety, de-escalation, and interacting with individuals in crisis.
(5) The executive head of the city may determine the characteristics of the crisis response team including, but not limited to:
(a) The department in which the crisis response team is situated;
(b) The number of staff assigned to the crisis response team and their required qualifications, consistent with the minimum qualifications set forth in subsection (4) of this section;
(c) The deployable areas and hours of operation;
and (d) The specific types of calls in which primary 911 dispatch is appropriate, consistent with the criteria set forth in subsection (2) of this section.
(6) For any collective bargaining agreement covering law enforcement personnel with an effective date on or after January 1, 2026, any provision in conflict with this section is preempted and is unenforceable.
A city covered by this section is prohibited from collectively bargaining with a bargaining unit representing law enforcement personnel in regard to the transfer of the 911 response duties in subsection (2) of this section to a civilian-staffed crisis response team.
(7) Any provision in a collective bargaining agreement covering law enforcement personnel with an effective date prior to January 1, 2026, that conflicts with this section or limits a city's ability to fully comply with this section may not be extended or renewed beyond the expiration date of the collective bargaining agreement.
(8) Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 41.56 RCW, a city covered by this section is prohibited from collectively bargaining with a bargaining unit representing law enforcement personnel in regard to any decisions made by the executive head of a city pursuant to subsections (3), (4), and (5) of this section.
However, to the extent such decisions impact the wages, hours, and other working conditions of law enforcement personnel, such impacts are subject to collective bargaining to the extent required by chapter 41.56 RCW.
12 SHBHB 1816 (3)Sec. For calls not included in subsection (2) of this section, the crisis response team may also serve as a secondary response in support of a law enforcement response as determined by the executive head of the political subdivision.
(4) The crisis response team is authorized to initiate a field response when the team observes an event that meets the criteria in subsection (2) of this section.
(5)(a) The executive head of an eligible political subdivision will consult with any of the following entities that are active within the political subdivision's jurisdiction to set minimum qualifications for the crisis response team:
(i) The Washington health care authority;
(ii) The behavioral health administrative services organization serving the political subdivision's jurisdiction;
(iii) The operators of mobile crisis teams administered by the behavioral health administrative services organization;
or (iv) The 988 call center hub for the region.
(b) The executive head must solicit input from the entities in (a) of this subsection on the crisis response team's:
(i) Services provided;
(ii) Qualifications;
(iii) Training;
(iv) Types of calls in which primary 911 dispatch is appropriate;
(v) Deployable areas;
and (vi) Hours of operation.
(c) Minimum qualifications must include training in scene safety, de-escalation, and interacting with individuals in crisis.
(d) The executive head of the political subdivision may determine the characteristics of the crisis response team including, but not limited to:
(i) The department in which the crisis response team is situated;
and (ii) The number of staff assigned to the crisis response team.
(6) The alternative 911 response constituted in this section is deemed a third 911 first responder, parallel to law enforcement and fire response.
The wages, hours, and other working conditions of all first responder personnel shall be subject to collective bargaining pursuant to chapter 41.56 RCW.
The scope of responsibilities to be responded to by alternative 911 first response shall fall outside of p.
2 SHB 1816 a general authority Washington law enforcement agency and outside of a general authority Washington fire response.
Sec.
Show all 47 changed lines (7 more)
(1) Personal information in any files maintained for students in public schools, patients or clients of public institutions or public health agencies, individuals receiving public safety or health services from a nonlaw enforcement agency,agency under section 1 of this act, or welfare recipients;
(4) Information required of any taxpayer in connection with the assessment or collection of any tax if the disclosure of the p.information to other persons would:
3(a) SHBBe 1816prohibited information to othersuch persons would:by RCW 84.08.210, 82.32.330, 84.40.020, 84.40.340, or any ordinance p.
(a)3 BeHB prohibited1816 to such persons by RCW 84.08.210, 82.32.330, 84.40.020, 84.40.340, or any ordinance authorized under RCW 35.102.145;
(8) All information related to individual claim resolution settlement agreements submitted to the board of industrial insurance p.
4 SHBHB 1816 (8) All information related to individual claim resolution settlement agreements submitted to the board of industrial insurance appeals under RCW 51.04.063, other than final orders from the board of industrial insurance appeals.
5 SHBHB 1816
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Referred to Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Returned to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
TEDV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans.
Sponsors
- Natasha Hill · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
- Greg Nance · Cosponsor
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Jamila Taylor · Cosponsor
- Edwin Obras · Cosponsor
- Roger Goodman · Cosponsor
- Lauren Davis · Cosponsor
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Cosponsor
- Jeremie Dufault · Cosponsor
- Darya Farivar · Cosponsor
- Lisa Parshley · Cosponsor
- Shaun Scott · Primary
- Julio Cortes · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 137 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Shaun Scott Democrat
Co-sponsors (13)
- Natasha Hill Democrat
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
- Greg Nance Democrat
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Jamila Taylor Democrat
- Edwin Obras Democrat
- Roger Goodman Democrat
- Lauren Davis Democrat
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
- Jeremie Dufault Republican
- Darya Farivar Democrat
- Lisa Parshley Democrat
- Julio Cortes Democrat
Not signed on (137)
137 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 137 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1816?
- HB 1816 is sponsored by Natasha Hill (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Greg Nance (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), Edwin Obras (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Lauren Davis (Democrat), Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Jeremie Dufault (Republican), Darya Farivar (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), Shaun Scott (Democrat), and Julio Cortes (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1816?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 04, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1816?
- Track HB 1816 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1816
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1816
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →