Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 5 D · 3 R cosponsors

SB 5928 — Concerning wildfire risk models and score disclosure.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 22, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · high confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 8 sponsors

    1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

154 added · 165 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to SB 5928 focus on improving transparency for property owners regarding wildfire risk assessments. The updated bill now mandates that insurers must inform property owners about their wildfire risk scores, the range of scores possible, and the key factors affecting these scores within 15 days of any decision made on their coverage applications. This revision is important because it gives consumers clearer insight into how wildfire risks may affect their insurance, allowing them to make more informed decisions about their property and potential risks.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5928 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Business, Trade & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Warnick, Short, Hasegawa, Holy, Nobles, Riccelli, Shewmake, and Stanford;
Z-0513.2 SENATE BILL 5928 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Warnick, Short, Hasegawa, Holy, Nobles, Riccelli, Shewmake, and Stanford;
by request of Insurance Commissioner) READ FIRST TIME 01/22/26.
by request of Insurance Commissioner Prefiled 12/22/25.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Business, Trade & Economic Development.
(1) An insurer that uses a wildfire risk score relating to property insurance and in connection with either the underwriting of real property regarding eligibility for coverage, or in rating of real property to generate a premium, or both, shall provide the insured, upon nonrenewal or cancellation due to wildfire risk or when the insured premiums are adversely impacted by the wildfire risk score, and if applicable the relevant insurance producer, the following information to enhance transparency:
(1) An insurer that uses a wildfire risk score relating to property insurance and in connection with either the underwriting of real property regarding eligibility for coverage, or in rating of real property to generate a premium, or both, shall provide the applicant or the insured, and the relevant insurance producer, the following information to enhance transparency:
(c) The name of the entity that created the wildfire risk score for the property;
(c) The name of the person or entity that created the wildfire risk score for the property;
p.
(d) The date on which the wildfire risk score was created for the property;
1 ESSB 5928 (d) The date on which the wildfire risk score was created for the property;
and p.
and (e) The key factors that adversely contributed to the wildfire risk score of the property and, for factors within the control of the consumer, the steps that the consumer can take to improve it.
1 SB 5928 (e) The key factors that adversely contributed to the wildfire risk score of the property and steps the consumer can take to improve it.
For factors outside the control of the consumer, a list of the factors may be provided without the steps to improve.
(2) An insurer shall provide to a property owner in writing and in plain language the information listed in subsection (1) of this section no later than 15 days after a decline or acceptance of property coverage the consumer applied for.
(2) When the insured premiums are adversely impacted by the wildfire risk score, an insurer shall provide to an insured in writing and in plain language the information listed in subsection (1) of this section in the renewal notice to the insured.
(3) An insurer shall provide the property owner in writing and in plain language the information listed in subsection (1) of this section within the renewal, nonrenewal, or cancellation notice.
(3) An insurer shall provide the insured in writing and in plain language the information listed in subsection (1) of this section within the nonrenewal or cancellation notice.
(4) An insurer shall provide a revised wildfire risk score or wildfire risk classification, once per policy period, no later than 20 business days after receipt of the policyholder's request with documentation that since the last evaluation the policyholder:
(4) An insurer shall provide a revised wildfire risk score or wildfire risk classification no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the policyholder's or applicant's documentation that since the last evaluation the policyholder or applicant:
(a) Has completed a property-specific mitigation action to reduce the risk of loss as identified by the insurer in section 2(3) of this act;
(a) Has completed a property-specific mitigation action to reduce the risk of loss;
or (b) Provides evidence of a community-level mitigation action in sufficient proximity to the property to reduce the risk of loss as identified by the insurer in section 2(3) of this act.
or (b) Provides evidence of a community-level mitigation action in sufficient proximity to the property to reduce the risk of loss.
(5)(a) A policyholder of residential personal lines property insurance whose wildfire risk model score, wildfire risk classification assigned to the property, or applicable mitigation discount is inaccurate, and provides evidence of the property- specific or community-level mitigation action may appeal the score directly to the insurer once per policy period.
(5)(a) A policyholder or applicant for a policy of property insurance whose wildfire risk model score, wildfire risk classification assigned to the property, or applicable mitigation discount is inaccurate, and provides evidence of the property- specific or community-level mitigation action may appeal the score directly to the insurer.
The insurer shall notify the policyholder in writing of the right to appeal the wildfire risk score or other wildfire risk classification or applicable mitigation discount when the score, classification, or discount is provided to the policyholder as required by subsections (2) and (3) of this section.
The insurer shall notify the policyholder or applicant in writing of the right to appeal the wildfire risk score or other wildfire risk classification or applicable mitigation discount when the score, classification, or discount is provided to the policyholder or applicant as required by subsections (2) and (3) of this section.
p.
(b) If the policyholder or applicant appeals the wildfire risk score or other wildfire risk classification or applicable wildfire discount, the insurer shall acknowledge receipt of the appeal in writing within 10 calendar days after receipt of the appeal.
2 ESSB 5928 (b) If the policyholder appeals the wildfire risk score or other wildfire risk classification or applicable wildfire discount, the insurer shall acknowledge receipt of the appeal in writing within 10 business days after receipt of the appeal.
The insurer shall respond to the appeal in writing with a reconsideration and decision within 30 calendar days after receiving the appeal.
The insurer shall respond to the appeal in writing with a reconsideration and decision within 20 business days after receiving the appeal.
If an appeal is denied, the insurer shall, upon request by the p.
If an appeal is denied, the insurer shall, upon request by the commissioner, forward a copy of the appeal and the insurer's response, to the commissioner.
2 SB 5928 commissioner, forward a copy of the appeal and the insurer's response, to the commissioner.
(a) "Adversely impacted" means charging a higher insurance premium for insurance than would have been offered if the wildfire risk score had been more favorable, whether the charge is by:
(a) "Insurer" means authorized insurers in this state;
(i) Application of a rating rule;
and (b) "Wildfire risk score" means a numerical value, rating, or categorization derived from a statistical tool, modeling system, algorithm, or other process that is used for the purpose of predicting the future wildfire related insurance loss exposure of a property to measure or assess wildfire risk for a residential property for the purposes of property evaluation in either underwriting, or rating, or both.
or (ii) Assignment to a rating tier that does not have the lowest available rates;
(b) "Insurer" means authorized insurers in this state;
and (c) "Wildfire risk score" means a numerical value, rating, or categorization derived from a statistical tool, modeling system, algorithm, or other process that is used for the purpose of predicting the future wildfire related insurance loss exposure of a property to measure or assess wildfire risk for residential personal lines property for the purposes of property evaluation in either underwriting, or rating, or both.
(1)(a) An insurer providing residential personal lines property insurance coverage that uses any wildfire risk model or a catastrophe model or scoring method to assign risk shall provide the wildfire risk model, catastrophe model, or scoring method used to assign risk, including a description of the model, the impact of the model on rates, and an actuarial justification for all rating factors, including mitigation discounts offered, and an explanation of the use of the model in underwriting decisions, to the commissioner as part of the insurer's complete rate filing.
(1)(a) An insurer that uses any wildfire risk model or a catastrophe model or scoring method to assign risk shall provide the wildfire risk model, catastrophe model, or scoring method used to assign risk, including a description of the model, the impact of the model on rates, an actuarial justification for all rating factors, including mitigation discounts offered, and an explanation of the use of the model in underwriting decisions, to the commissioner as part of the insurer's complete rate filing.
Such explanation is limited to wildfire risk only and an insurer is not required to submit underwriting guidelines or manuals as part of the explanation.
(b) To the extent data is available and as established by rule, an insurer shall submit to the commissioner, as part of their rate filings, information on how and whether the models used for either underwriting, or rating account, or both, for statewide and local mitigation activities, such as forest treatment, investments in wildfire fighting and mitigation equipment, and utility wildfire mitigation activities.
p.
(c) Wildfire risk models must not be used to determine personal insurance rates, premiums, or eligibility for coverage unless the scoring models are filed with the commissioner.
3 ESSB 5928 (b) To the extent data is available and as established by rule, an insurer shall submit to the commissioner, as part of their rate filings, information on how and whether the models used for either underwriting, or rating, or both, account for statewide and local mitigation activities, such as forest treatment, investments in wildfire fighting and mitigation equipment, and utility wildfire mitigation activities.
(c) Wildfire risk models must not be used to calculate premiums or rate differentials, or eligibility for coverage unless the scoring models are filed with the commissioner.
Information filed under this subsection may be made public by the commissioner for the sole purpose of enforcement actions taken by the commissioner.
Information filed p.
(2) An insurer providing residential personal lines property insurance coverage that uses a wildfire risk model, a catastrophe model, or a combination of models shall ensure the following factors are either incorporated in the wildfire risk model, catastrophe model, or combination of models or are otherwise demonstrably included in the insurer's underwriting and pricing when actuarially supported:
3 SB 5928 under this subsection may be made public by the commissioner for the sole purpose of enforcement actions taken by the commissioner.
(2) An insurer that uses a wildfire risk model, a catastrophe model, or a combination of models shall ensure the following factors are either incorporated in the wildfire risk model, catastrophe model, or combination of models or are otherwise demonstrably included in the insurer's underwriting and pricing:
(3) An insurer providing residential personal lines property insurance coverage shall post on its public website readily accessible information on the premium discounts, incentives, or other premium adjustments that may be available to policyholders who undertake property-specific mitigation actions or provide evidence of community-level mitigation actions and the process for appealing a wildfire risk score.
(3) If an insurer does not incorporate property-specific and community-level mitigation actions into its models, the insurer must provide discounts to policyholders who can demonstrate that property- specific mitigation actions have been undertaken on the property or community-level mitigation actions have been undertaken in sufficient proximity to the property to reduce the risk of loss.
(4) An insurer shall post on its public website readily accessible information on the premium discounts, incentives, or other premium adjustments that are available to policyholders who undertake property-specific mitigation actions or provide evidence of community-level mitigation actions and the process for appealing a wildfire risk score.
p.
(a) Property-specific mitigation actions for the policyholder to undertake and community-level mitigation actions that could result in a discount, incentive, or other premium adjustment;
4 ESSB 5928 (a) Property-specific mitigation actions for the policyholder to undertake and community-level mitigation actions that could result in a discount, incentive, or other premium adjustment;
and (b) The amount of the discount, incentive, or other premium adjustment associated with each action.
and (b) The potential amount of the discount, incentive, or other premium adjustment that may be available.
(5) For the purposes of this section:
(4) For the purposes of this section:
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
(c) "Property-specific mitigation action" means a science-based mitigation action as demonstrated by the "wildfire prepared home" designation from the insurance institute for business and home safety or by a similar mitigation program that includes a verification and certification process;
p.
and (d) "Wildfire risk model" means a tool, instrumentality, means, or product, including a map-based tool, a computer-based tool, or a simulation, that is used by an insurer in whole or in part, to measure or assess the wildfire risk associated with a residential personal lines property or community for purposes of rating, classifying, or pricing based on wildfire risk or estimating risks or losses corresponding to the wildfire risk classifications.
4 SB 5928 (c) "Property-specific mitigation action" means a science-based mitigation action as demonstrated by the "wildfire prepared home" designation from the insurance institute for business and home safety or by a similar mitigation program that includes a verification and certification process;
(5) The commissioner may adopt rules as necessary to implement this section.
and (d) "Wildfire risk model" means a tool, instrumentality, means, or product, including a map-based tool, a computer-based tool, or a simulation, that is used by an insurer in whole or in part, to measure or assess the wildfire risk associated with a residential property or community for purposes of rating, classifying, or pricing based on wildfire risk or estimating risks or losses corresponding to the wildfire risk classifications.
(6) The commissioner may adopt rules as necessary to implement this section.
5 ESSB 5928
5 SB 5928
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Consumer Protection & Business at 1:30 PM.

  3. Public hearing in the House Committee on Consumer Protection & Business at 1:30 PM.

  4. First reading, referred to Consumer Protection & Business.

  5. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  6. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  7. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  8. 1st substitute bill substituted (BTE 26).

  9. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  10. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  11. Minority; without recommendation.

  12. BTE - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  13. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Business, Trade & Economic Development at 8:00 AM.

  14. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Business, Trade & Economic Development at 8:00 AM.

  15. First reading, referred to Business, Trade & Economic Development.

  16. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (143)

143 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 143 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30000
Republican 18100
Total 48100
% of votes cast 98%2%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5928?
SB 5928 is sponsored by Derek Stanford (Democrat), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Marcus Riccelli (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Jeff Holy (Republican), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Shelly Short (Republican), and Judy Warnick (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 5928?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 22, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 5928?
Track SB 5928 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5928

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5928

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →