Employment protections: mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees: call centers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1601 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1601.
You're tracking AB 1601
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1601 — Employment protections: mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees: call centers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 752, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 03, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law generally regulates the wages, hours, and working conditions of people employed in any occupation. Existing law creates the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the head of which is the Labor Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an employer from ordering a mass layoff, relocation, or termination, as defined, at a covered establishment, as defined, without giving a written notice of the order to certain parties and entities, including the employees, the Employment Development Department, and specified local officials. Existing federal law, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, provides for workforce investment activities, including activities in which states may participate. Existing law requires the local chief elected officials in a local workforce development area to form, pursuant to specified guidelines, a local workforce investment board to plan and oversee the workforce investment system, and further requires the Governor to periodically certify one local board for each local area in the state. Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner, in any investigation or proceeding under provisions governing the relocation, termination, or mass layoff of employees, to examine the books and records of an employer. This bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner to enforce certain notice requirements concerning a mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees, including call center employees. The bill would grant the Labor Commissioner the authority to investigate an alleged violation, order appropriate temporary relief to mitigate a violation pending completion of a full investigation or hearing, and issue a citation in accordance with certain procedures. This bill would prohibit a call center employer from ordering a relocation of its call center, or one or more of its facilities or operating units within a call center, unless notice of the relocation is provided to the affected employees and the Employment Development Department, local workforce investment board, and the chief elected official of each city and county government within which the termination, relocation, or mass layoff occurs, as specified. The bill would require the Employment Development Department to compile and publish semiannually, on its internet website, a list of call center employers that provided notice, as prescribed. The bill would require the Employment Development Department and local workforce development boards to provide workforce services to call center employers and their call center employees who are laid off as a result of the relocation of a call center. By imposing new duties on local government officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would establish remedies for a call center employer's failure to provide notice regarding a relocation of its call center facilities and would make a call center employer who appears on the department's list, or who should appear on the list but failed to provide notice, ineligible to be awarded or have renewed state grants or state-guaranteed loans for 5 years, as specified. The bill would also make that call center employer ineligible to claim a tax credit for 5 taxable years beginning on and after the date that the list is published. The bill would authorize an appropriate agency, as defined, to waive ineligibility for specified reasons. This bill would preclude the withholding or denial of payments, compensation, or benefits under any other state law to workers based upon these provisions, as specified. The bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner and the Employment Development Department to adopt regulations as necessary to implement these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2022
- Enrolled 09/01/22 - Enrolled pdf September 01, 2022
- Amended 08/25/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 25, 2022
- Amended 08/11/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 11, 2022
- Amended 06/30/22 - Amended Senate pdf June 30, 2022
- Amended 05/19/22 - Amended Assembly pdf May 19, 2022
- Introduced 01/03/22 - Introduced pdf January 03, 2022
- AB1601 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 752, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 18.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 5223.).
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 28).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R., G.O. and GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 19.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 19).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 28 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 18 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 25% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Min | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 26 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 19 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 24% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Villapudua | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1601 do?
- Existing law generally regulates the wages, hours, and working conditions of people employed in any occupation. Existing law creates the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the head of which is the Labor Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an employer from ordering a mass layoff, relocation, or termination, as defined, at a covered establishment, as defined, without giving a written notice of the order to certain parties and entities, including the employees, the Employment Development Department, and specified local officials. Existing federal law, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, provides for workforce investment activities, including activities in which states may participate. Existing law requires the local chief elected officials in a local workforce development area to form, pursuant to specified guidelines, a local workforce investment board to plan and oversee the workforce investment system, and further requires the Governor to periodically certify one local board for each local area in the state. Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner, in any investigation or proceeding under provisions governing the relocation, termination, or mass layoff of employees, to examine the books and records of an employer. This bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner to enforce certain notice requirements concerning a mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees, including call center employees. The bill would grant the Labor Commissioner the authority to investigate an alleged violation, order appropriate temporary relief to mitigate a violation pending completion of a full investigation or hearing, and issue a citation in accordance with certain procedures. This bill would prohibit a call center employer from ordering a relocation of its call center, or one or more of its facilities or operating units within a call center, unless notice of the relocation is provided to the affected employees and the Employment Development Department, local workforce investment board, and the chief elected official of each city and county government within which the termination, relocation, or mass layoff occurs, as specified. The bill would require the Employment Development Department to compile and publish semiannually, on its internet website, a list of call center employers that provided notice, as prescribed. The bill would require the Employment Development Department and local workforce development boards to provide workforce services to call center employers and their call center employees who are laid off as a result of the relocation of a call center. By imposing new duties on local government officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would establish remedies for a call center employer's failure to provide notice regarding a relocation of its call center facilities and would make a call center employer who appears on the department's list, or who should appear on the list but failed to provide notice, ineligible to be awarded or have renewed state grants or state-guaranteed loans for 5 years, as specified. The bill would also make that call center employer ineligible to claim a tax credit for 5 taxable years beginning on and after the date that the list is published. The bill would authorize an appropriate agency, as defined, to waive ineligibility for specified reasons. This bill would preclude the withholding or denial of payments, compensation, or benefits under any other state law to workers based upon these provisions, as specified. The bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner and the Employment Development Department to adopt regulations as necessary to implement these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 1601?
- AB 1601 is sponsored by Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1601?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 03, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1601?
- Track AB 1601 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1601
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1601
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →