California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

AB 371 — Shared mobility devices: insurance and tracking.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 740, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 80% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires a shared mobility service provider, as defined, to enter into an agreement with, or obtain a permit from, the city or county with jurisdiction over the area of use. Existing law defines shared mobility device to mean an electrically motorized board, motorized scooter, electric bicycle, bicycle, or other similar personal transportation device, except as provided. Existing law requires a city or county that authorizes a shared mobility device provider to operate within its jurisdiction to adopt operation, parking, and maintenance rules, as provided, regarding the use of the shared mobility devices in its jurisdiction before the provider may offer shared mobility devices for rent or use. This bill would require a shared mobility service provider to affix to each shared mobility device a tactile sign containing raised characters and accompanying Braille, as specified, to identify the device for the purpose of reporting illegal or negligent activity. Existing law requires that the shared mobility provider maintain a specified amount of commercial general liability insurance that, among other things, must be with a carrier doing business in California, in a user agreement before distributing a shared mobility device within that jurisdiction. This bill, rather than require the shared mobility service provider to maintain commercial general liability insurance with a carrier doing business in California, would require the coverage to be with an admitted insurer or a nonadmitted insurer, as specified. Starting July 1, 2023, this bill would require a shared mobility service provider or user of a shared mobility device to offer or make available, or to confirm a user of a shared mobility device maintains, $10,000 of coverage for any bodily injury or death suffered by a pedestrian in any one accident when the injury or death involves, in whole or in part, the negligent conduct of the shared mobility device user, and $1,000 of coverage for any property damage to an assistive technology device, as defined. The bill would prohibit a shared mobility service provider from allowing a user or individual to operate or utilize a shared mobility device without the coverage, and would exempt bicycles propelled exclusively by human power and specified electric bicycles from these requirements. The bill would authorize a provider to partner with an insurer to provide coverage that meets or exceeds those requirements to its users via its digital application or other electronic or digital platform, and fund the cost of providing coverage in its standard fee or through a separate charge to users. The bill would require the shared mobility service provider to maintain coverage if a user does not maintain the required insurance coverage. The bill would authorize a provider to enter into agreements with users that maintain their own coverage that meets or exceeds the above requirements to exclude the user from the provider's coverage. The bill would also require a provider to keep an up-to-date list of its users that maintain their own coverage and transmit annually, to the Department of Insurance, information on the percentage of total users in the state that maintain their own coverage and the total number of users, as specified. The bill would specify that it does not prohibit a provider from requiring a user to enter into an indemnity contract, and would specify certain requirements that the indemnity contract would be required to meet. The bill would prohibit parties from waiving or modifying any of its provisions by contractual agreement, act, or omission. The bill would require a shared mobility service provider to disclose, in a specified manner, prior to allowing the user to initiate their first use of a device, that the customer's existing homeowner's, renter's, or automobile insurance policies might not provide coverage for liability resulting from the use of shared mobility devices and that the customer should contact their insurance company or insurance agent to determine if coverage is provided. This bill would require, no later than December 31, 2026, the Department of Insurance to submit to the Legislature and insurance committees, as specified, a study that includes, among other things, recommendations to update shared mobility device insurance coverage requirements, how to strengthen the market for individual mobility device liability coverage, and whether there is a need for insurance coverage for injuries involving bicycles propelled exclusively by human power and specified electric bicycles.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 740, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 0.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended.

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 5. Page 5102.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 11).

  11. In committee: Referred to suspense file.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 22).

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on INS.

  15. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  16. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  17. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on INS. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1716.) (June 29).

  18. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  19. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and INS.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 3. Page 1402.)

  22. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1244.)

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  25. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 13).

  26. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  27. Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.

  28. From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.

  29. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Jones-Sawyer

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 55 Yea · 0 Nay · 25 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27005
Unaffiliated 280011
Republican 0009
Total 550025
% of votes cast 69%0%0%31%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Cunningham — Yea
Friedman — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Villapudua — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Gray — Not Voting
Smith — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Levine — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Not Voting
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Haney, Matt Democratic Not Voting
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Not Voting
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 5 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7006
Unaffiliated 17303
Republican 1201
Total 255010
% of votes cast 63%13%0%25%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Pan — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Newman — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Min — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Bates — Nay
Kamlager — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Atkins — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Not Voting
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 3001
Republican 0100
Total 5101
% of votes cast 71%14%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bates — Not Voting
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Bates — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7003
Republican 0100
Democratic 0001
Total 7104
% of votes cast 58%8%0%33%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Dodd — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Roth — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Glazer — Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 3001
Republican 0001
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Borgeas — Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 59 Yea · 3 Nay · 16 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 5005
Unaffiliated 32207
Democratic 22104
Total 593016
% of votes cast 76%4%0%21%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Wood — Yea
Ting — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Levine — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gray — Nay
Burke — Nay
Bloom — Not Voting
Friedman — Not Voting
Villapudua — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Low — Not Voting
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Nay
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6001
Unaffiliated 2001
Republican 1000
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Kiley — Yea
Chau — Yea
Cunningham — Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 371 do?
Existing law requires a shared mobility service provider, as defined, to enter into an agreement with, or obtain a permit from, the city or county with jurisdiction over the area of use. Existing law defines shared mobility device to mean an electrically motorized board, motorized scooter, electric bicycle, bicycle, or other similar personal transportation device, except as provided. Existing law requires a city or county that authorizes a shared mobility device provider to operate within its jurisdiction to adopt operation, parking, and maintenance rules, as provided, regarding the use of the shared mobility devices in its jurisdiction before the provider may offer shared mobility devices for rent or use. This bill would require a shared mobility service provider to affix to each shared mobility device a tactile sign containing raised characters and accompanying Braille, as specified, to identify the device for the purpose of reporting illegal or negligent activity. Existing law requires that the shared mobility provider maintain a specified amount of commercial general liability insurance that, among other things, must be with a carrier doing business in California, in a user agreement before distributing a shared mobility device within that jurisdiction. This bill, rather than require the shared mobility service provider to maintain commercial general liability insurance with a carrier doing business in California, would require the coverage to be with an admitted insurer or a nonadmitted insurer, as specified. Starting July 1, 2023, this bill would require a shared mobility service provider or user of a shared mobility device to offer or make available, or to confirm a user of a shared mobility device maintains, $10,000 of coverage for any bodily injury or death suffered by a pedestrian in any one accident when the injury or death involves, in whole or in part, the negligent conduct of the shared mobility device user, and $1,000 of coverage for any property damage to an assistive technology device, as defined. The bill would prohibit a shared mobility service provider from allowing a user or individual to operate or utilize a shared mobility device without the coverage, and would exempt bicycles propelled exclusively by human power and specified electric bicycles from these requirements. The bill would authorize a provider to partner with an insurer to provide coverage that meets or exceeds those requirements to its users via its digital application or other electronic or digital platform, and fund the cost of providing coverage in its standard fee or through a separate charge to users. The bill would require the shared mobility service provider to maintain coverage if a user does not maintain the required insurance coverage. The bill would authorize a provider to enter into agreements with users that maintain their own coverage that meets or exceeds the above requirements to exclude the user from the provider's coverage. The bill would also require a provider to keep an up-to-date list of its users that maintain their own coverage and transmit annually, to the Department of Insurance, information on the percentage of total users in the state that maintain their own coverage and the total number of users, as specified. The bill would specify that it does not prohibit a provider from requiring a user to enter into an indemnity contract, and would specify certain requirements that the indemnity contract would be required to meet. The bill would prohibit parties from waiving or modifying any of its provisions by contractual agreement, act, or omission. The bill would require a shared mobility service provider to disclose, in a specified manner, prior to allowing the user to initiate their first use of a device, that the customer's existing homeowner's, renter's, or automobile insurance policies might not provide coverage for liability resulting from the use of shared mobility devices and that the customer should contact their insurance company or insurance agent to determine if coverage is provided. This bill would require, no later than December 31, 2026, the Department of Insurance to submit to the Legislature and insurance committees, as specified, a study that includes, among other things, recommendations to update shared mobility device insurance coverage requirements, how to strengthen the market for individual mobility device liability coverage, and whether there is a need for insurance coverage for injuries involving bicycles propelled exclusively by human power and specified electric bicycles.
Who sponsors AB 371?
AB 371 is sponsored by Jones-Sawyer, Reyes, Eloise Gómez (Democratic), Waldron, Wicks, Buffy (Democratic), and Hueso.
What is the current status of AB 371?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 371?
Track AB 371 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 371

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 371

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →