Elementary and secondary education: omnibus bill.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1057 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1057.
You're tracking SB 1057
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1057 — Elementary and secondary education: omnibus bill.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 301, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act and the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act require, except as specified, that all meetings of specified governmental bodies be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. Existing law requires meetings of school district governing boards to be conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and certain other provisions relating to meetings. Existing law exempts certain councils and schoolsite advisory committees from those acts and provisions but specifies other open meeting requirements for those councils and committees. This bill would extend those exemptions and other open meeting requirements to special education community advisory committees. To the extent that extending the other open meeting requirements would impose new duties on school districts, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes procedures under which new school districts may be formed by dissolving 2 or more existing school districts of the same kind from the entire territory of the original school districts, by forming one or more new school districts of the same kind from all or parts of one or more existing school districts of the same kind, or by unifying or deunifying school districts as specified. Existing law requires the boundaries of each high school district to be coextensive with the boundaries of the component school districts included within it and requires that when boundaries of a school district that is a component of a high school district are changed to include or exclude territory, that territory be included in or excluded from the high school district. This bill would clarify that those boundary requirements also apply to unified school districts. (3) Existing law establishes various procedures and requirements for the reorganization of school districts. Existing law authorizes an appeal to the State Board of Education of an approval of a petition to transfer territory by a county committee on school district organization, as provided. Existing law requires the state board's appeal decision to be sent to the county committee, which is then required to notify the county board of supervisors or the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law also authorizes an appeal to the state board of a county committee's findings that an action to transfer territory or form one or more new school districts will not adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the school district, and requires the state board to notify the county committee of its decision on the appeal, as provided. Existing law requires a county committee to hold a public hearing with respect to reorganization in the area proposed for reorganization and authorizes the committee to adopt a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization and transmit it to the state board with an order for a hearing, a reorganization, or an election, as provided. For an appeal of an approved petition, this bill would instead require the state board's decision to be sent directly to the county superintendent of schools. For an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings, the bill would stay certain actions before and pending an appeal and would additionally require the secretary of the state board to take various notification actions regarding an appeal. For a final recommendation ordering a reorganization or ordering an election, the bill would authorize an appeal under the same procedures as an appeal of an approved petition or an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings. (4) Existing law authorizes classes of any elementary, high school, or unified school district to be held on Saturday or Sunday, or both, as specified, but prohibits the voluntary attendance on those days of mentally gifted pupils, as defined, in approved programs from being included in the average daily attendance computation. This bill would apply that prohibition instead to the voluntary attendance on those days to pupils enrolled in programs for gifted and talented pupils. (5) Existing law establishes the Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Career Technical Education Educator Credentialing Program for purposes of providing alternative routes to credentialing, as specified, and requires the commission, together with the Committee on Accreditation, to develop a process to authorize additional high-quality alternative route educator preparation programs provided by school districts, county offices of education, community-based organizations, and nongovernmental organizations. Existing law authorizes the commission to also establish alternative criteria, if necessary, for project participants that are not eligible for accreditation by one of the accredited organizations. This bill would remove that criteria authorization. (6) Prior law, repealed January 1, 2019, authorized a juvenile court to suspend or order a delay in the issuance of the driving privilege, for one year, of a minor who is a habitual truant, as defined, or who is adjudged to be a ward of the court, as prescribed. This bill would make conforming changes to other provisions relating to pupil attendance to reflect the change in law described above by deleting obsolete references. (7) This bill would also update cross-references, delete obsolete provisions, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/13/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 13, 2022
- Enrolled 08/19/22 - Enrolled pdf August 19, 2022
- Amended 06/13/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 13, 2022
- Amended 04/18/22 - Amended Senate pdf April 18, 2022
- Introduced 02/15/22 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2022
- SB1057 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 301, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4866.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5828.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 3).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
June 15 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3672.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing May 9.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3539.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
March 30 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing March 30.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Education · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Education
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1057 do?
- (1) The Ralph M. Brown Act and the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act require, except as specified, that all meetings of specified governmental bodies be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. Existing law requires meetings of school district governing boards to be conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and certain other provisions relating to meetings. Existing law exempts certain councils and schoolsite advisory committees from those acts and provisions but specifies other open meeting requirements for those councils and committees. This bill would extend those exemptions and other open meeting requirements to special education community advisory committees. To the extent that extending the other open meeting requirements would impose new duties on school districts, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes procedures under which new school districts may be formed by dissolving 2 or more existing school districts of the same kind from the entire territory of the original school districts, by forming one or more new school districts of the same kind from all or parts of one or more existing school districts of the same kind, or by unifying or deunifying school districts as specified. Existing law requires the boundaries of each high school district to be coextensive with the boundaries of the component school districts included within it and requires that when boundaries of a school district that is a component of a high school district are changed to include or exclude territory, that territory be included in or excluded from the high school district. This bill would clarify that those boundary requirements also apply to unified school districts. (3) Existing law establishes various procedures and requirements for the reorganization of school districts. Existing law authorizes an appeal to the State Board of Education of an approval of a petition to transfer territory by a county committee on school district organization, as provided. Existing law requires the state board's appeal decision to be sent to the county committee, which is then required to notify the county board of supervisors or the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law also authorizes an appeal to the state board of a county committee's findings that an action to transfer territory or form one or more new school districts will not adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the school district, and requires the state board to notify the county committee of its decision on the appeal, as provided. Existing law requires a county committee to hold a public hearing with respect to reorganization in the area proposed for reorganization and authorizes the committee to adopt a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization and transmit it to the state board with an order for a hearing, a reorganization, or an election, as provided. For an appeal of an approved petition, this bill would instead require the state board's decision to be sent directly to the county superintendent of schools. For an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings, the bill would stay certain actions before and pending an appeal and would additionally require the secretary of the state board to take various notification actions regarding an appeal. For a final recommendation ordering a reorganization or ordering an election, the bill would authorize an appeal under the same procedures as an appeal of an approved petition or an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings. (4) Existing law authorizes classes of any elementary, high school, or unified school district to be held on Saturday or Sunday, or both, as specified, but prohibits the voluntary attendance on those days of mentally gifted pupils, as defined, in approved programs from being included in the average daily attendance computation. This bill would apply that prohibition instead to the voluntary attendance on those days to pupils enrolled in programs for gifted and talented pupils. (5) Existing law establishes the Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Career Technical Education Educator Credentialing Program for purposes of providing alternative routes to credentialing, as specified, and requires the commission, together with the Committee on Accreditation, to develop a process to authorize additional high-quality alternative route educator preparation programs provided by school districts, county offices of education, community-based organizations, and nongovernmental organizations. Existing law authorizes the commission to also establish alternative criteria, if necessary, for project participants that are not eligible for accreditation by one of the accredited organizations. This bill would remove that criteria authorization. (6) Prior law, repealed January 1, 2019, authorized a juvenile court to suspend or order a delay in the issuance of the driving privilege, for one year, of a minor who is a habitual truant, as defined, or who is adjudged to be a ward of the court, as prescribed. This bill would make conforming changes to other provisions relating to pupil attendance to reflect the change in law described above by deleting obsolete references. (7) This bill would also update cross-references, delete obsolete provisions, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors SB 1057?
- SB 1057 is sponsored by Committee on Education.
- What is the current status of SB 1057?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1057?
- Track SB 1057 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1057
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1057
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →