California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1057 — Elementary and secondary education: omnibus bill.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 301, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act and the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act require, except as specified, that all meetings of specified governmental bodies be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. Existing law requires meetings of school district governing boards to be conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and certain other provisions relating to meetings. Existing law exempts certain councils and schoolsite advisory committees from those acts and provisions but specifies other open meeting requirements for those councils and committees. This bill would extend those exemptions and other open meeting requirements to special education community advisory committees. To the extent that extending the other open meeting requirements would impose new duties on school districts, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes procedures under which new school districts may be formed by dissolving 2 or more existing school districts of the same kind from the entire territory of the original school districts, by forming one or more new school districts of the same kind from all or parts of one or more existing school districts of the same kind, or by unifying or deunifying school districts as specified. Existing law requires the boundaries of each high school district to be coextensive with the boundaries of the component school districts included within it and requires that when boundaries of a school district that is a component of a high school district are changed to include or exclude territory, that territory be included in or excluded from the high school district. This bill would clarify that those boundary requirements also apply to unified school districts. (3) Existing law establishes various procedures and requirements for the reorganization of school districts. Existing law authorizes an appeal to the State Board of Education of an approval of a petition to transfer territory by a county committee on school district organization, as provided. Existing law requires the state board's appeal decision to be sent to the county committee, which is then required to notify the county board of supervisors or the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law also authorizes an appeal to the state board of a county committee's findings that an action to transfer territory or form one or more new school districts will not adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the school district, and requires the state board to notify the county committee of its decision on the appeal, as provided. Existing law requires a county committee to hold a public hearing with respect to reorganization in the area proposed for reorganization and authorizes the committee to adopt a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization and transmit it to the state board with an order for a hearing, a reorganization, or an election, as provided. For an appeal of an approved petition, this bill would instead require the state board's decision to be sent directly to the county superintendent of schools. For an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings, the bill would stay certain actions before and pending an appeal and would additionally require the secretary of the state board to take various notification actions regarding an appeal. For a final recommendation ordering a reorganization or ordering an election, the bill would authorize an appeal under the same procedures as an appeal of an approved petition or an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings. (4) Existing law authorizes classes of any elementary, high school, or unified school district to be held on Saturday or Sunday, or both, as specified, but prohibits the voluntary attendance on those days of mentally gifted pupils, as defined, in approved programs from being included in the average daily attendance computation. This bill would apply that prohibition instead to the voluntary attendance on those days to pupils enrolled in programs for gifted and talented pupils. (5) Existing law establishes the Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Career Technical Education Educator Credentialing Program for purposes of providing alternative routes to credentialing, as specified, and requires the commission, together with the Committee on Accreditation, to develop a process to authorize additional high-quality alternative route educator preparation programs provided by school districts, county offices of education, community-based organizations, and nongovernmental organizations. Existing law authorizes the commission to also establish alternative criteria, if necessary, for project participants that are not eligible for accreditation by one of the accredited organizations. This bill would remove that criteria authorization. (6) Prior law, repealed January 1, 2019, authorized a juvenile court to suspend or order a delay in the issuance of the driving privilege, for one year, of a minor who is a habitual truant, as defined, or who is adjudged to be a ward of the court, as prescribed. This bill would make conforming changes to other provisions relating to pupil attendance to reflect the change in law described above by deleting obsolete references. (7) This bill would also update cross-references, delete obsolete provisions, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 301, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4866.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5828.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  8. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 3).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. June 15 hearing postponed by committee.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  12. Referred to Com. on ED.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3672.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  16. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  17. Set for hearing May 9.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3539.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  20. Set for hearing April 27.

  21. March 30 hearing postponed by committee.

  22. Set for hearing March 30.

  23. Referred to Com. on ED.

  24. From printer.

  25. Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.

  26. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Education · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Education

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22001
Democratic 12001
Republican 4000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hueso — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Bates — Yea
Min — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Newman — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Unaffiliated 37002
Democratic 30002
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Levine — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Voepel — Not Voting
Bloom — Not Voting
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Not Voting
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
Democratic 7000
Republican 2000
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2000
Democratic 3000
Republican 2000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 12001
Unaffiliated 21002
Republican 2002
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Pan — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Newman — Yea
Roth — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Min — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Not Voting
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 3000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Pan — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1057 do?
(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act and the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act require, except as specified, that all meetings of specified governmental bodies be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. Existing law requires meetings of school district governing boards to be conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and certain other provisions relating to meetings. Existing law exempts certain councils and schoolsite advisory committees from those acts and provisions but specifies other open meeting requirements for those councils and committees. This bill would extend those exemptions and other open meeting requirements to special education community advisory committees. To the extent that extending the other open meeting requirements would impose new duties on school districts, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes procedures under which new school districts may be formed by dissolving 2 or more existing school districts of the same kind from the entire territory of the original school districts, by forming one or more new school districts of the same kind from all or parts of one or more existing school districts of the same kind, or by unifying or deunifying school districts as specified. Existing law requires the boundaries of each high school district to be coextensive with the boundaries of the component school districts included within it and requires that when boundaries of a school district that is a component of a high school district are changed to include or exclude territory, that territory be included in or excluded from the high school district. This bill would clarify that those boundary requirements also apply to unified school districts. (3) Existing law establishes various procedures and requirements for the reorganization of school districts. Existing law authorizes an appeal to the State Board of Education of an approval of a petition to transfer territory by a county committee on school district organization, as provided. Existing law requires the state board's appeal decision to be sent to the county committee, which is then required to notify the county board of supervisors or the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law also authorizes an appeal to the state board of a county committee's findings that an action to transfer territory or form one or more new school districts will not adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the school district, and requires the state board to notify the county committee of its decision on the appeal, as provided. Existing law requires a county committee to hold a public hearing with respect to reorganization in the area proposed for reorganization and authorizes the committee to adopt a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization and transmit it to the state board with an order for a hearing, a reorganization, or an election, as provided. For an appeal of an approved petition, this bill would instead require the state board's decision to be sent directly to the county superintendent of schools. For an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings, the bill would stay certain actions before and pending an appeal and would additionally require the secretary of the state board to take various notification actions regarding an appeal. For a final recommendation ordering a reorganization or ordering an election, the bill would authorize an appeal under the same procedures as an appeal of an approved petition or an appeal of racial or ethnic integration findings. (4) Existing law authorizes classes of any elementary, high school, or unified school district to be held on Saturday or Sunday, or both, as specified, but prohibits the voluntary attendance on those days of mentally gifted pupils, as defined, in approved programs from being included in the average daily attendance computation. This bill would apply that prohibition instead to the voluntary attendance on those days to pupils enrolled in programs for gifted and talented pupils. (5) Existing law establishes the Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Career Technical Education Educator Credentialing Program for purposes of providing alternative routes to credentialing, as specified, and requires the commission, together with the Committee on Accreditation, to develop a process to authorize additional high-quality alternative route educator preparation programs provided by school districts, county offices of education, community-based organizations, and nongovernmental organizations. Existing law authorizes the commission to also establish alternative criteria, if necessary, for project participants that are not eligible for accreditation by one of the accredited organizations. This bill would remove that criteria authorization. (6) Prior law, repealed January 1, 2019, authorized a juvenile court to suspend or order a delay in the issuance of the driving privilege, for one year, of a minor who is a habitual truant, as defined, or who is adjudged to be a ward of the court, as prescribed. This bill would make conforming changes to other provisions relating to pupil attendance to reflect the change in law described above by deleting obsolete references. (7) This bill would also update cross-references, delete obsolete provisions, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 1057?
SB 1057 is sponsored by Committee on Education.
What is the current status of SB 1057?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1057?
Track SB 1057 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1057

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1057

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →