California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

AB 2179 — COVID-19 relief: tenancy.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2022.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act, until October 1, 2025, establishes procedural requirements and limitations on evictions for nonpayment of rent due to COVID-19 rental debt, as defined. The act, among other things, requires that a notice that demands payment of COVID-19 rental debt served pursuant to specified law be modified, as provided. The act requires that a notice that demands payment of rent that came due during the transition time period, as defined, comply with certain requirements, including that the notice include certain text which varies depending on the date that the notice is served. This bill would require notices described above that are served on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022, to include certain text. The act subjects an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or administrative action adopted by a city, county, or city and county in response to the COVID–19 pandemic to protect tenants from eviction to certain limitations. The act provides that any extension, expansion, renewal, reenactment, or new adoption of a measure by the specified local authorities, which occurs between August 19, 2020, and March 31, 2022, has no effect before April 1, 2022. The act also imposes requirements and limitations on any provision described above that is in effect on August 19, 2020, and that allows a tenant a specified period of time in which to repay COVID-19 rental debt. If such a provision required the repayment period to commence on or before May 1, 2022, the act provides that an extension of that date shall have no effect, and if such a provision required the repayment period to commence after May 1, 2022, or conditioned commencement of repayment on the termination of a state of emergency, the act deems the repayment period to begin on May 1, 2022. The act prohibits such a provision from extending the period of time to repay COVID-19 rental debt beyond the period that was in effect on August 19, 2020, and in no case beyond May 31, 2023. This bill would instead provide that any extension, expansion, renewal, reenactment, or new adoption of a measure by the specified local authorities, that occurs between August 19, 2020, and June 30, 2022, has no effect before July 1, 2022, and would make a conforming change. The bill would extend the date for which the requirements and limitations described above relating to COVID-19 rental debt repayment periods are determined to August 1, 2022. The bill would prohibit any provision by the specified local authorities permitting a tenant to repay COVID-19 rental debt beyond August 31, 2023. (2) Existing law, the COVID-19 Rental Housing Recovery Act, among other things, on or after October 1, 2021, and before March 31, 2022, places certain restrictions on unlawful detainer actions pertaining to residential real property and based, in whole or in part, on nonpayment of rental debt that accumulated due to COVID-19 hardship. The act requires that a notice for a residential rental property that demands payment of COVID-19 recovery period rental debt served pursuant to specified law be modified, as provided, including to include certain text. This bill would require the modifications to a notice that is described above to be made only for notices served before April 1 2022, and would specify new modifications for notices served on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022. The act prohibits a court from issuing a summons on a complaint unless the plaintiff also files, for tenancies initially established before October 1, 2021, a statement, under penalty of perjury, as specified, verifying certain information related to applications for government rental assistance to cover the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. Existing law prohibits a judgment or default judgment from being issued in favor of the plaintiff unless the court finds that the plaintiff completed an application to the pertinent government rental assistance program to cover the rental debt demanded in the complaint and the application was denied, as specified. This bill would extend the application of these provisions to June 30, 2022. The bill would require, prior to the court issuing a summons under these provisions, a plaintiff to file a statement, under penalty of perjury, that a determination is not pending on an application, filed prior to April 1, 2022, for government rental assistance to cover any part of the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. The bill would allow, in an action filed on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022, a judgment or default judgment to be issued in favor of the plaintiff if the court finds that a determination is not pending on an application, filed prior to April 1, 2022, for government rental assistance to cover any part of the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:15 a.m.

  4. In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 3277.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Art. IV, Sec. 8(b) of the Constitution dispensed with. (Ayes 31. Noes 5. Page 3276.)

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (March 30).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 1. Page 4046.).

  14. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 4041.)

  15. Read second time and amended.

  16. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 28).

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  18. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 3975.)

  19. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  20. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  22. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20003
Democratic 12100
Republican 4000
Total 36103
% of votes cast 90%3%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Min — Yea
Roth — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Newman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 6100
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Bates — Nay
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5100
Unaffiliated 4000
Republican 1000
Total 10100
% of votes cast 91%9%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 62 Yea · 1 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31107
Democratic 24004
Republican 7002
Total 621013
% of votes cast 82%1%0%17%
How each member voted (76)
Member Party Vote
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Gray — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Ting — Nay
Smith — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Medina — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Not Voting
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Not Voting
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2179 do?
(1) Existing law, the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act, until October 1, 2025, establishes procedural requirements and limitations on evictions for nonpayment of rent due to COVID-19 rental debt, as defined. The act, among other things, requires that a notice that demands payment of COVID-19 rental debt served pursuant to specified law be modified, as provided. The act requires that a notice that demands payment of rent that came due during the transition time period, as defined, comply with certain requirements, including that the notice include certain text which varies depending on the date that the notice is served. This bill would require notices described above that are served on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022, to include certain text. The act subjects an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or administrative action adopted by a city, county, or city and county in response to the COVID–19 pandemic to protect tenants from eviction to certain limitations. The act provides that any extension, expansion, renewal, reenactment, or new adoption of a measure by the specified local authorities, which occurs between August 19, 2020, and March 31, 2022, has no effect before April 1, 2022. The act also imposes requirements and limitations on any provision described above that is in effect on August 19, 2020, and that allows a tenant a specified period of time in which to repay COVID-19 rental debt. If such a provision required the repayment period to commence on or before May 1, 2022, the act provides that an extension of that date shall have no effect, and if such a provision required the repayment period to commence after May 1, 2022, or conditioned commencement of repayment on the termination of a state of emergency, the act deems the repayment period to begin on May 1, 2022. The act prohibits such a provision from extending the period of time to repay COVID-19 rental debt beyond the period that was in effect on August 19, 2020, and in no case beyond May 31, 2023. This bill would instead provide that any extension, expansion, renewal, reenactment, or new adoption of a measure by the specified local authorities, that occurs between August 19, 2020, and June 30, 2022, has no effect before July 1, 2022, and would make a conforming change. The bill would extend the date for which the requirements and limitations described above relating to COVID-19 rental debt repayment periods are determined to August 1, 2022. The bill would prohibit any provision by the specified local authorities permitting a tenant to repay COVID-19 rental debt beyond August 31, 2023. (2) Existing law, the COVID-19 Rental Housing Recovery Act, among other things, on or after October 1, 2021, and before March 31, 2022, places certain restrictions on unlawful detainer actions pertaining to residential real property and based, in whole or in part, on nonpayment of rental debt that accumulated due to COVID-19 hardship. The act requires that a notice for a residential rental property that demands payment of COVID-19 recovery period rental debt served pursuant to specified law be modified, as provided, including to include certain text. This bill would require the modifications to a notice that is described above to be made only for notices served before April 1 2022, and would specify new modifications for notices served on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022. The act prohibits a court from issuing a summons on a complaint unless the plaintiff also files, for tenancies initially established before October 1, 2021, a statement, under penalty of perjury, as specified, verifying certain information related to applications for government rental assistance to cover the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. Existing law prohibits a judgment or default judgment from being issued in favor of the plaintiff unless the court finds that the plaintiff completed an application to the pertinent government rental assistance program to cover the rental debt demanded in the complaint and the application was denied, as specified. This bill would extend the application of these provisions to June 30, 2022. The bill would require, prior to the court issuing a summons under these provisions, a plaintiff to file a statement, under penalty of perjury, that a determination is not pending on an application, filed prior to April 1, 2022, for government rental assistance to cover any part of the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. The bill would allow, in an action filed on or after April 1, 2022, and before July 1, 2022, a judgment or default judgment to be issued in favor of the plaintiff if the court finds that a determination is not pending on an application, filed prior to April 1, 2022, for government rental assistance to cover any part of the rental debt demanded from the defendants in the case. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 2179?
AB 2179 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic) and Wicks, Buffy (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2179?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2179?
Track AB 2179 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2179

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2179

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →