Income taxes: credits: low-income housing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1911 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1911.
You're tracking AB 1911
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1911 — Income taxes: credits: low-income housing.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2028, would allow a credit against those taxes to a taxpayer that is transferred, and allocated, credits pursuant to the sale of a specified multifamily rental housing development to a qualified developer, that has received a credit reservation from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, in specified amounts. The bill would define a qualified developer for purposes of this bill, in part, as a specified entity that commits, at application to the committee and under penalty of perjury, to employing a tax credit reservation allowed by the bill in the acquisition of a qualified development. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the credits to be reserved on a first-come-first-served basis. The bill would limit the aggregate amount of credit that may be allocated by the committee, as provided. The bill would also provide that the credit amount shall be $0 for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2028, unless otherwise specified in a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Act. Existing law requires that any bill introduced on or after January 1, 2020, that would authorize certain tax expenditures, as defined, or tax exemptions contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure or exemption will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/19/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 19, 2022
- Amended 03/07/22 - Amended Assembly pdf March 07, 2022
- Introduced 02/09/22 - Introduced pdf February 09, 2022
- AB1911 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4736.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jesse Gabriel · Primary
- Rebecca Bauer-Kahan · Cosponsor
- Marc Berman · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
- Friedman · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Alex Lee · Cosponsor
- Low · Cosponsor
- O'Donnell · Cosponsor
- Cottie Petrie-Norris · Cosponsor
- Robert Rivas · Cosponsor
- Christopher M. Ward · Cosponsor
- Buffy Wicks · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gabriel, Jesse Democratic
Co-sponsors (17)
- Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic
- Berman, Marc Democratic
- Bloom
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
- Friedman
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Lee, Alex Democratic
- Low
- O'Donnell
- Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic
- Rivas, Robert Democratic
- Ward, Christopher M. Democratic
- Wicks, Buffy Democratic
- Wood
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1911 do?
- The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2028, would allow a credit against those taxes to a taxpayer that is transferred, and allocated, credits pursuant to the sale of a specified multifamily rental housing development to a qualified developer, that has received a credit reservation from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, in specified amounts. The bill would define a qualified developer for purposes of this bill, in part, as a specified entity that commits, at application to the committee and under penalty of perjury, to employing a tax credit reservation allowed by the bill in the acquisition of a qualified development. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the credits to be reserved on a first-come-first-served basis. The bill would limit the aggregate amount of credit that may be allocated by the committee, as provided. The bill would also provide that the credit amount shall be $0 for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2028, unless otherwise specified in a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Act. Existing law requires that any bill introduced on or after January 1, 2020, that would authorize certain tax expenditures, as defined, or tax exemptions contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure or exemption will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 1911?
- AB 1911 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic), Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca (Democratic), Berman, Marc (Democratic), Bloom, Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Friedman, Gallagher, James (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Lee, Alex (Democratic), Low, O'Donnell, Petrie-Norris, Cottie (Democratic), Rivas, Robert (Democratic), Ward, Christopher M. (Democratic), Wicks, Buffy (Democratic), Wood, Garcia, Robert (Democratic), and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1911?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1911?
- Track AB 1911 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1911
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1911
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →