Oil and gas wastewater: unlined ponds: prohibition.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2447 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2447.
You're tracking AB 2447
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2447 — Oil and gas wastewater: unlined ponds: prohibition.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Quirk.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Geologic Energy Management Division in the Department of Conservation under the direction of the State Oil and Gas Supervisor, who is required to supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells. Existing law requires the owner of any well to file with the supervisor a monthly statement that provides certain information relating to the well, including the source, volume, treatment, and disposition of water produced in oil and gas activities. Under existing law, a person who fails to comply with this and other requirements relating to the regulation of oil or gas operations is guilty of a misdemeanor. Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality, including prescribing waste discharge requirements for the discharge of waste that could affect the quality of the waters of the state. Under the act, persons discharging waste are required to file with the appropriate regional board a report of the discharge and the discharge is subject to waste discharge requirements prescribed by that regional board. Under the act, each regional board is required to formulate and adopt water quality control plans for all areas within its region, as specified. Beginning January 1, 2023, and until January 1, 2025, this bill would prohibit the disposal of produced wastewater, as defined, into unlined ponds and the construction of new unlined ponds, except as conducted pursuant to a permit or other authorization lawfully issued before that date, and would also prohibit the issuance or renewal of a permit or other authorization for those activities. Beginning January 1, 2025, the bill would prohibit all disposal of produced wastewater into unlined ponds and the construction of new unlined ponds. The bill would exclude from these prohibitions the discharge of produced wastewater into unlined ponds under specified conditions. The bill would require, as needed, the State Water Resources Control Board and regional water quality control boards, on or before January 1, 2025, to adopt amendments to their rules and regulations consistent with the prohibitions beginning January 1, 2023. To the extent regional water quality control boards would be required to provide a higher level of service in the amending of rules and regulations, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Because violation of the prohibition on disposing of produced wastewater into unlined ponds or constructing new unlined ponds, except pursuant to a permit issued before January 1, 2023, or as otherwise exempted, would create a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/19/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 19, 2022
- Amended 04/07/22 - Amended Assembly pdf April 07, 2022
- Introduced 02/17/22 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2022
- AB2447 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Quirk.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 19).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Quirk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Quirk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2447 do?
- Existing law establishes the Geologic Energy Management Division in the Department of Conservation under the direction of the State Oil and Gas Supervisor, who is required to supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells. Existing law requires the owner of any well to file with the supervisor a monthly statement that provides certain information relating to the well, including the source, volume, treatment, and disposition of water produced in oil and gas activities. Under existing law, a person who fails to comply with this and other requirements relating to the regulation of oil or gas operations is guilty of a misdemeanor. Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality, including prescribing waste discharge requirements for the discharge of waste that could affect the quality of the waters of the state. Under the act, persons discharging waste are required to file with the appropriate regional board a report of the discharge and the discharge is subject to waste discharge requirements prescribed by that regional board. Under the act, each regional board is required to formulate and adopt water quality control plans for all areas within its region, as specified. Beginning January 1, 2023, and until January 1, 2025, this bill would prohibit the disposal of produced wastewater, as defined, into unlined ponds and the construction of new unlined ponds, except as conducted pursuant to a permit or other authorization lawfully issued before that date, and would also prohibit the issuance or renewal of a permit or other authorization for those activities. Beginning January 1, 2025, the bill would prohibit all disposal of produced wastewater into unlined ponds and the construction of new unlined ponds. The bill would exclude from these prohibitions the discharge of produced wastewater into unlined ponds under specified conditions. The bill would require, as needed, the State Water Resources Control Board and regional water quality control boards, on or before January 1, 2025, to adopt amendments to their rules and regulations consistent with the prohibitions beginning January 1, 2023. To the extent regional water quality control boards would be required to provide a higher level of service in the amending of rules and regulations, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Because violation of the prohibition on disposing of produced wastewater into unlined ponds or constructing new unlined ponds, except pursuant to a permit issued before January 1, 2023, or as otherwise exempted, would create a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 2447?
- AB 2447 is sponsored by Quirk.
- What is the current status of AB 2447?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2447?
- Track AB 2447 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2447
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2447
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →