SB 1024 — Replacement of an incapacitated or deceased professional fiduciary.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 612, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Guardianship-Conservatorship Law generally establishes the standards and procedures for the appointment and termination of an appointment for a guardian or conservator of a person, an estate, or both. Existing law provides for the appointment of a professional fiduciary to manage an estate or trust or administer a guardianship or conservatorship. Existing law authorizes the conservator of the estate of a disabled attorney to petition for the appointment of an active member of the State Bar of California to take control of the files and assets of the practice of the disabled member. Existing law also authorizes the personal representative of the estate of a deceased attorney who was engaged in a practice of law at the time of the attorney's death or other person interested in the estate to petition for appointment of an active member of the State Bar of California to take control of the files and assets of the practice of the deceased member. This bill similarly would authorize specified parties, commencing January 1, 2024, to petition for the appointment of a professional fiduciary practice administrator, as defined, to act as a temporary professional fiduciary when a professional fiduciary either becomes incapacitated or dies and a vacancy exists, as defined. The bill would require notice of the hearing on the petition for appointment of a professional fiduciary practice administrator as temporary successor to be given to all persons entitled to notice in each of the matters that are the subject of the petition, as specified. The bill would authorize the court to appoint the professional fiduciary practice administrator, as prescribed, and to require the professional fiduciary practice administrator to file a surety bond in each matter in which they are appointed temporary successor. The bill would require the appointment of the professional fiduciary practice administrator to terminate, in each of the matters on which the professional fiduciary practice administrator was appointed as a temporary successor, 45 days after the entry of the order appointing the professional fiduciary practice administrator, except as specified. The bill would set forth compensation requirements for the professional fiduciary practice administrator. The bill would also require the professional fiduciary practice administrator to provide written notice to all interested parties to advise those parties of the necessity and process for the appointment of a permanent successor, as specified. The bill would authorize the court to extend any of the time periods prescribed in the bill if the court determines that good cause exists, and that the extension is in the best interest of the minor, the conservatee, the decedent's estate, or the current income beneficiaries under a trust, as applicable. The bill would specify that the bill does not limit the authority granted to a court to remove or replace a guardian or conservator, personal representative, or trustee in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would require the Judicial Council to create or revise any forms or rules necessary to implement its provisions, no later than January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, until January 1, 2024, establishes the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs, and requires the bureau to license and regulate professional fiduciaries, as defined. Existing law requires the bureau to maintain specified information in a licensed professional fiduciary's file and requires a licensee to annually file a statement with the bureau, under penalty of perjury, that contains specified information, including whether the licensee has been removed for cause as a conservator, guardian, trustee, personal representative, agent under durable power of attorney for health care, or agent under a durable power of attorney for finances. This bill would expand the definition of "professional fiduciary" to make these provisions applicable to professional fiduciary practice administrators, including the requirement to annually report under penalty of perjury. The bill would require a licensee to disclose, and the bureau to maintain in the licensee's record, whether the licensee has ever been removed for cause from a position arising from an appointment as a professional fiduciary practice administrator. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 6534 and 6561 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1495 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1495 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2022
- Enrolled 09/09/22 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2022
- Amended 08/29/22 - Amended Assembly pdf August 29, 2022
- Amended 08/24/22 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2022
- Amended 06/06/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 06, 2022
- Amended 04/25/22 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2022
- Amended 03/02/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 02, 2022
- Introduced 02/15/22 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2022
- SB1024 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 612, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5373.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
-
In Assembly. Held at Desk.
-
Ordered to the Assembly.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5828.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 3).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 8).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3670.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3595.) (May 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Brian W. Jones · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Min | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1024 do?
- (1) The Guardianship-Conservatorship Law generally establishes the standards and procedures for the appointment and termination of an appointment for a guardian or conservator of a person, an estate, or both. Existing law provides for the appointment of a professional fiduciary to manage an estate or trust or administer a guardianship or conservatorship. Existing law authorizes the conservator of the estate of a disabled attorney to petition for the appointment of an active member of the State Bar of California to take control of the files and assets of the practice of the disabled member. Existing law also authorizes the personal representative of the estate of a deceased attorney who was engaged in a practice of law at the time of the attorney's death or other person interested in the estate to petition for appointment of an active member of the State Bar of California to take control of the files and assets of the practice of the deceased member. This bill similarly would authorize specified parties, commencing January 1, 2024, to petition for the appointment of a professional fiduciary practice administrator, as defined, to act as a temporary professional fiduciary when a professional fiduciary either becomes incapacitated or dies and a vacancy exists, as defined. The bill would require notice of the hearing on the petition for appointment of a professional fiduciary practice administrator as temporary successor to be given to all persons entitled to notice in each of the matters that are the subject of the petition, as specified. The bill would authorize the court to appoint the professional fiduciary practice administrator, as prescribed, and to require the professional fiduciary practice administrator to file a surety bond in each matter in which they are appointed temporary successor. The bill would require the appointment of the professional fiduciary practice administrator to terminate, in each of the matters on which the professional fiduciary practice administrator was appointed as a temporary successor, 45 days after the entry of the order appointing the professional fiduciary practice administrator, except as specified. The bill would set forth compensation requirements for the professional fiduciary practice administrator. The bill would also require the professional fiduciary practice administrator to provide written notice to all interested parties to advise those parties of the necessity and process for the appointment of a permanent successor, as specified. The bill would authorize the court to extend any of the time periods prescribed in the bill if the court determines that good cause exists, and that the extension is in the best interest of the minor, the conservatee, the decedent's estate, or the current income beneficiaries under a trust, as applicable. The bill would specify that the bill does not limit the authority granted to a court to remove or replace a guardian or conservator, personal representative, or trustee in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would require the Judicial Council to create or revise any forms or rules necessary to implement its provisions, no later than January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, until January 1, 2024, establishes the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs, and requires the bureau to license and regulate professional fiduciaries, as defined. Existing law requires the bureau to maintain specified information in a licensed professional fiduciary's file and requires a licensee to annually file a statement with the bureau, under penalty of perjury, that contains specified information, including whether the licensee has been removed for cause as a conservator, guardian, trustee, personal representative, agent under durable power of attorney for health care, or agent under a durable power of attorney for finances. This bill would expand the definition of "professional fiduciary" to make these provisions applicable to professional fiduciary practice administrators, including the requirement to annually report under penalty of perjury. The bill would require a licensee to disclose, and the bureau to maintain in the licensee's record, whether the licensee has ever been removed for cause from a position arising from an appointment as a professional fiduciary practice administrator. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 6534 and 6561 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1495 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1495 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1024?
- SB 1024 is sponsored by Jones, Brian W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1024?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1024?
- Track SB 1024 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1024
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1024
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →