California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 1902 — Resource conservation: resource conservation districts.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 585, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Conservation and requires it to provide soil conservation advisory services to local governments, land owners, farmers and ranchers, resource conservation districts, and the general public, as provided. This bill would delete this provision. The bill would authorize the department to have certain powers and duties pertaining to resource conservation activities and programs, including serving as a state-level liaison with resource conservation districts. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, as provided, the bill would authorize the department to provide grants and other forms of local assistance to resource conservation districts. (2) Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district to be formed, as provided, for the control of runoff, the prevention or control of soil erosion, the development and distribution of water, and the improvement of land capabilities. Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district, among other things, to, with the consent of the owner, construct on privately or publicly owned lands any necessary works for the prevention and control of soil erosion and erosion stabilization. Existing law authorizes directors of the resource conservation districts to accept, administer, and manage soil conversion, water conversion, water distribution, erosion control, or erosion prevention projects, as provided. This bill would authorize a resource conservation district to be formed to provide resource conservation services for the protection, conservation, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources, as provided. The bill would also authorize a resource conservation district to, with the consent of the owner, construct on privately or publicly owned lands any necessary works for the protection, conservation, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources, the improvement or enhancement of adaptation or resilience to climate change, or the mitigation or sequestration of carbon emissions, and to develop and implement projects and programs for the conservation, enhancement, restoration, adaptation, and resilience of soil, water, and biodiversity and related natural resource conservation. The bill would authorize directors of the resource conservation districts to accept, administer, and manage specified projects and programs consistent with these purposes, among other things. The bill would authorize a resource conservation district to enter into an interagency agreement with a state agency, as provided. (3) Existing law authorizes the department to provide grants to resource conservation districts for the purpose of assisting the districts in carrying out any work that they are authorized to undertake. Existing law requires a resource conservation district, in order to qualify for a grant, to provide at least a 25% local match of funding, as provided. Existing law requires the department to give preference in the awarding of grants to those districts that provide a greater percentage of local match funding, as provided. This bill would delete the requirement that the department give the above described preference in the awarding of grants. The bill would instead authorize the department to waive the local match of funding requirement, described above, if the district meets one of a list of specified conditions, as provided. (4) Existing law requires the lands included in resource conservation districts to be those generally of value for agricultural purposes, but authorizes other lands to be included if necessary, as provided. Existing law provides that the lands included in any one resource conservation district need not be contiguous, but requires the land to be susceptible of the same general plan or system, as provided. This bill would instead require the lands to be included in a resource conservation district to be those that further existing law relating to resource conservation districts, including the purposes described above. The bill would delete the requirement that the lands be susceptible of the same general plan or system, as provided. (5) Existing law authorizes resource conservation districts to develop districtwide comprehensive annual and long-range work plans to address the full range of soil and related resource problems. Existing law prescribes various requirements for the contents of the plans and reports and when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided. This bill would instead authorize each resource conservation district to develop a long-range work plan, annual work plan, and annual district report to address specified projects and programs. The bill would require resource conservation districts that prepare long-range work plans and annual work plans to provide, for informational purposes only, long-range work plans, and updates to these plans, and annual work plans to the boards of supervisors of every county with land in the district's jurisdiction and to certain boards and councils of other public agencies, as provided. The bill would update the dates when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided, among other things. (6) Existing law provides that the sale or conveyance of any property held by a resource conservation district, when the property is sold for valuable consideration, shall convey good title to the property. Existing law requires the proceeds of a sale of that property to be paid into the county treasury of the principal county for the use of the district. This bill would require, if the resource conservation district operates in a specified manner, the proceeds of a sale of that property to be paid to the district treasury.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 585, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5982.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4906.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  15. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and N.R. & W.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5034.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  19. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 18).

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  23. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  26. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32000
Unaffiliated 36003
Republican 8001
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Levine — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22001
Democratic 12001
Republican 4000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Kamlager — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bates — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Pan — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Min — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Newman — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 4000
Republican 2000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Hueso — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27003
Unaffiliated 37002
Republican 9000
Total 73005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Not Voting
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7001
Democratic 7000
Republican 1000
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Levine — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Democratic 4000
Unaffiliated 3000
Total 8000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Voepel — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1902 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Conservation and requires it to provide soil conservation advisory services to local governments, land owners, farmers and ranchers, resource conservation districts, and the general public, as provided. This bill would delete this provision. The bill would authorize the department to have certain powers and duties pertaining to resource conservation activities and programs, including serving as a state-level liaison with resource conservation districts. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, as provided, the bill would authorize the department to provide grants and other forms of local assistance to resource conservation districts. (2) Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district to be formed, as provided, for the control of runoff, the prevention or control of soil erosion, the development and distribution of water, and the improvement of land capabilities. Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district, among other things, to, with the consent of the owner, construct on privately or publicly owned lands any necessary works for the prevention and control of soil erosion and erosion stabilization. Existing law authorizes directors of the resource conservation districts to accept, administer, and manage soil conversion, water conversion, water distribution, erosion control, or erosion prevention projects, as provided. This bill would authorize a resource conservation district to be formed to provide resource conservation services for the protection, conservation, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources, as provided. The bill would also authorize a resource conservation district to, with the consent of the owner, construct on privately or publicly owned lands any necessary works for the protection, conservation, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources, the improvement or enhancement of adaptation or resilience to climate change, or the mitigation or sequestration of carbon emissions, and to develop and implement projects and programs for the conservation, enhancement, restoration, adaptation, and resilience of soil, water, and biodiversity and related natural resource conservation. The bill would authorize directors of the resource conservation districts to accept, administer, and manage specified projects and programs consistent with these purposes, among other things. The bill would authorize a resource conservation district to enter into an interagency agreement with a state agency, as provided. (3) Existing law authorizes the department to provide grants to resource conservation districts for the purpose of assisting the districts in carrying out any work that they are authorized to undertake. Existing law requires a resource conservation district, in order to qualify for a grant, to provide at least a 25% local match of funding, as provided. Existing law requires the department to give preference in the awarding of grants to those districts that provide a greater percentage of local match funding, as provided. This bill would delete the requirement that the department give the above described preference in the awarding of grants. The bill would instead authorize the department to waive the local match of funding requirement, described above, if the district meets one of a list of specified conditions, as provided. (4) Existing law requires the lands included in resource conservation districts to be those generally of value for agricultural purposes, but authorizes other lands to be included if necessary, as provided. Existing law provides that the lands included in any one resource conservation district need not be contiguous, but requires the land to be susceptible of the same general plan or system, as provided. This bill would instead require the lands to be included in a resource conservation district to be those that further existing law relating to resource conservation districts, including the purposes described above. The bill would delete the requirement that the lands be susceptible of the same general plan or system, as provided. (5) Existing law authorizes resource conservation districts to develop districtwide comprehensive annual and long-range work plans to address the full range of soil and related resource problems. Existing law prescribes various requirements for the contents of the plans and reports and when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided. This bill would instead authorize each resource conservation district to develop a long-range work plan, annual work plan, and annual district report to address specified projects and programs. The bill would require resource conservation districts that prepare long-range work plans and annual work plans to provide, for informational purposes only, long-range work plans, and updates to these plans, and annual work plans to the boards of supervisors of every county with land in the district's jurisdiction and to certain boards and councils of other public agencies, as provided. The bill would update the dates when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided, among other things. (6) Existing law provides that the sale or conveyance of any property held by a resource conservation district, when the property is sold for valuable consideration, shall convey good title to the property. Existing law requires the proceeds of a sale of that property to be paid into the county treasury of the principal county for the use of the district. This bill would require, if the resource conservation district operates in a specified manner, the proceeds of a sale of that property to be paid to the district treasury.
Who sponsors AB 1902?
AB 1902 is sponsored by Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 1902?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1902?
Track AB 1902 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1902

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1902

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →