Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: alternative project delivery methods.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1845 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1845.
You're tracking AB 1845
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1845 — Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: alternative project delivery methods.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 275, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law generally sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by local agencies for public works contracts. Existing law authorizes certain entities, including the Department of General Services, the Military Department, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and specified local agencies, to use the design-build procurement process, as prescribed, for specified public works. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to use the design-build procurement process for certain regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects. The bill would define "design-build" to mean a project delivery process in which both the design and construction of a project are procured from a single entity. The bill would require the district to use a specified design-build procedure to assign contracts for the design and construction of a project, as defined. Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to use the progressive design-build procurement process for certain public works projects. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to use the progressive design-build procurement process for regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects under specified conditions. The bill would define "progressive design-build" to mean a project delivery process in which both the design and construction of a project are procured from a single design-build entity that is selected through a qualifications-based selection at the earliest feasible stage of the project. The bill would require a progressive design-build contract be awarded on a best value or qualifications basis or to the lowest responsible bidder. The bill would require the district, if using this process, to prepare and issue a request for qualifications in order to select a design-build entity based on certain factors. Existing law authorizes certain entities, including the Department of Transportation, the Department of Water Resources, regional transportation agencies, and the San Diego Association of Governments, to engage in a Construction Manager/General Contractor project delivery method (CM/GC method) for specified public work projects. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to utilize the CM/GC method for regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects under specified conditions. The bill would define the CM/GC method generally as a project delivery method in which a construction manager is procured to provide preconstruction services during the design phase of the project and construction services during the construction phase of the project, whereby construction services may be entered into at the same time as the contract for preconstruction services or at a later time. The bill would require a CM/GC method contract be awarded on a best value or qualifications basis or to the lowest responsible bidder. The bill would specify the procedure for CM/GC projects, including, among other things, requiring the district to select a construction manager through a request for qualifications, as prescribed. The bill would permit the use of alternative project delivery methods on no more than 15 capital outlay projects. The bill would also prohibit a design-build entity, construction manager, or construction contractor from being awarded a construction contract unless it provides an enforceable commitment to the district that the design-build entity, construction manager, or construction contractor and its subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce to perform project work applicable to certain apprenticeable occupations in the building and construction trades, in accordance with existing law, and subject to certain exceptions. By expanding the application of the crime of perjury for a violation of certain certification and skilled and trained workforce requirements, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the district to submit to the relevant committees of the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2027, a report containing a description of each public works project procured by the district through the progressive design-build process that is completed after January 1, 2023, and before December 1, 2026, and a report containing a description of each CM/GC project approved through the processes described in these provisions, specified. The bill would make its provisions pertaining to the progressive design-build and CM/GC methods effective only until January 1, 2028. The bill would provide that its provisions pertaining to design-build remain in effect in accordance with a related provision governing local agency design-build projects, which is repealed on January 1, 2025. Existing law generally requires the board, when work is not performed by a district itself by force account and the amount involved is $25,000 or more, to provide for the letting of contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, after publication of notices inviting bids, and subject to the right of the board to reject proposals. This bill would create an exception to those provisions for the alternative project delivery methods authorized by this bill. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the geographic area served by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/13/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 13, 2022
- Enrolled 08/26/22 - Enrolled pdf August 26, 2022
- Amended 08/15/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 15, 2022
- Amended 06/16/22 - Amended Senate pdf June 16, 2022
- Amended 04/04/22 - Amended Assembly pdf April 04, 2022
- Amended 03/24/22 - Amended Assembly pdf March 24, 2022
- Amended 03/15/22 - Amended Assembly pdf March 15, 2022
- Introduced 02/08/22 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2022
- AB1845 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 275, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0.).
-
Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 5020.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 4917.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (May 18).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 23).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and W.,P., & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lisa Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 70 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 6% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1845 do?
- Existing law generally sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by local agencies for public works contracts. Existing law authorizes certain entities, including the Department of General Services, the Military Department, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and specified local agencies, to use the design-build procurement process, as prescribed, for specified public works. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to use the design-build procurement process for certain regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects. The bill would define "design-build" to mean a project delivery process in which both the design and construction of a project are procured from a single entity. The bill would require the district to use a specified design-build procedure to assign contracts for the design and construction of a project, as defined. Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to use the progressive design-build procurement process for certain public works projects. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to use the progressive design-build procurement process for regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects under specified conditions. The bill would define "progressive design-build" to mean a project delivery process in which both the design and construction of a project are procured from a single design-build entity that is selected through a qualifications-based selection at the earliest feasible stage of the project. The bill would require a progressive design-build contract be awarded on a best value or qualifications basis or to the lowest responsible bidder. The bill would require the district, if using this process, to prepare and issue a request for qualifications in order to select a design-build entity based on certain factors. Existing law authorizes certain entities, including the Department of Transportation, the Department of Water Resources, regional transportation agencies, and the San Diego Association of Governments, to engage in a Construction Manager/General Contractor project delivery method (CM/GC method) for specified public work projects. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to utilize the CM/GC method for regional recycled water projects or other water infrastructure projects under specified conditions. The bill would define the CM/GC method generally as a project delivery method in which a construction manager is procured to provide preconstruction services during the design phase of the project and construction services during the construction phase of the project, whereby construction services may be entered into at the same time as the contract for preconstruction services or at a later time. The bill would require a CM/GC method contract be awarded on a best value or qualifications basis or to the lowest responsible bidder. The bill would specify the procedure for CM/GC projects, including, among other things, requiring the district to select a construction manager through a request for qualifications, as prescribed. The bill would permit the use of alternative project delivery methods on no more than 15 capital outlay projects. The bill would also prohibit a design-build entity, construction manager, or construction contractor from being awarded a construction contract unless it provides an enforceable commitment to the district that the design-build entity, construction manager, or construction contractor and its subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce to perform project work applicable to certain apprenticeable occupations in the building and construction trades, in accordance with existing law, and subject to certain exceptions. By expanding the application of the crime of perjury for a violation of certain certification and skilled and trained workforce requirements, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the district to submit to the relevant committees of the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2027, a report containing a description of each public works project procured by the district through the progressive design-build process that is completed after January 1, 2023, and before December 1, 2026, and a report containing a description of each CM/GC project approved through the processes described in these provisions, specified. The bill would make its provisions pertaining to the progressive design-build and CM/GC methods effective only until January 1, 2028. The bill would provide that its provisions pertaining to design-build remain in effect in accordance with a related provision governing local agency design-build projects, which is repealed on January 1, 2025. Existing law generally requires the board, when work is not performed by a district itself by force account and the amount involved is $25,000 or more, to provide for the letting of contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, after publication of notices inviting bids, and subject to the right of the board to reject proposals. This bill would create an exception to those provisions for the alternative project delivery methods authorized by this bill. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the geographic area served by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1845?
- AB 1845 is sponsored by Calderon, Lisa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1845?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1845?
- Track AB 1845 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1845
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1845
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →