Water rights: measurement of diversion.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 832 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 832.
You're tracking SB 832
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 832 — Water rights: measurement of diversion.
Last action — May 19 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law defines various terms applicable to the Water Code. This bill would define "water year," unless otherwise specified, to mean the 12-month period beginning October 1 and ending September 30. (2) Existing law requires a person who diverts 10 acre-feet or more of water per year under a permit or license to install and maintain a device or employ a method capable of measuring the rate of direct diversion, rate of collection to storage, and rate of withdrawal or release from storage. Existing law requires the measurements to be made using the best available technologies and best professional practices using a device or methods satisfactory to the State Water Resources Control Board, as specified in regulations adopted by the state board. Existing law requires a permittee or licensee to maintain a record of all diversion monitoring, as provided, and to include those records with annual reports required to be submitted to the state board. Existing law authorizes the state board to modify these requirements if the state board finds that strict compliance with these requirements is infeasible, is unreasonably expensive, would unreasonably affect public trust uses, or would result in the waste or unreasonable use of water, or that the need for monitoring and reporting is adequately addressed by other conditions of the permit or license. This bill, among other things, would clarify existing law that a diverter, as defined, diverting 10 acre-feet or more of water per year is subject to these water diversion measurement, recording, and reporting requirements, as specified. This bill would require the state board to develop and administer a study to determine the ability of evapotranspiration alone, or in combination with other methodologies, to provide the information needed to monitor water diversions, as specified. The bill would require the state board to provide the Legislature with a report documenting the study, its results, and the findings of an independent review on or before January 1, 2028.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/22 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 06, 2022
- Amended 03/23/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 23, 2022
- Amended 03/10/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 10, 2022
- Introduced 01/03/22 - Introduced pdf January 03, 2022
- SB832 View text html
Action History
-
May 19 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
April 25 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3327.) (April 5).
-
Set for hearing April 5.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
March 22 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing March 22.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 3.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Dodd · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dodd
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 20% | 40% | 0% | 40% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Wahab, Aisha | Democratic | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wahab, Aisha | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 832 do?
- (1) Existing law defines various terms applicable to the Water Code. This bill would define "water year," unless otherwise specified, to mean the 12-month period beginning October 1 and ending September 30. (2) Existing law requires a person who diverts 10 acre-feet or more of water per year under a permit or license to install and maintain a device or employ a method capable of measuring the rate of direct diversion, rate of collection to storage, and rate of withdrawal or release from storage. Existing law requires the measurements to be made using the best available technologies and best professional practices using a device or methods satisfactory to the State Water Resources Control Board, as specified in regulations adopted by the state board. Existing law requires a permittee or licensee to maintain a record of all diversion monitoring, as provided, and to include those records with annual reports required to be submitted to the state board. Existing law authorizes the state board to modify these requirements if the state board finds that strict compliance with these requirements is infeasible, is unreasonably expensive, would unreasonably affect public trust uses, or would result in the waste or unreasonable use of water, or that the need for monitoring and reporting is adequately addressed by other conditions of the permit or license. This bill, among other things, would clarify existing law that a diverter, as defined, diverting 10 acre-feet or more of water per year is subject to these water diversion measurement, recording, and reporting requirements, as specified. This bill would require the state board to develop and administer a study to determine the ability of evapotranspiration alone, or in combination with other methodologies, to provide the information needed to monitor water diversions, as specified. The bill would require the state board to provide the Legislature with a report documenting the study, its results, and the findings of an independent review on or before January 1, 2028.
- Who sponsors SB 832?
- SB 832 is sponsored by Dodd.
- What is the current status of SB 832?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 832?
- Track SB 832 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 832
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 832
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →