Williamson Act: subvention payments: appropriation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1773 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1773.
You're tracking AB 1773
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1773 — Williamson Act: subvention payments: appropriation.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, authorizes a city or county to enter into contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts and continuously appropriates General Fund moneys for that purpose. This bill, for the 2022–23 fiscal year, would appropriate an additional $40,000,000 from the General Fund to the Controller to make subvention payments to counties, as provided, in proportion to the losses incurred by those counties by reason of the reduction of assessed property taxes. The bill would make various findings in this regard.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/03/22 - Introduced Current pdf February 03, 2022
- AB1773 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Steven S. Choi · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Smith · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Villapudua · Cosponsor
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Dahle · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Patterson, Joe Republican
Co-sponsors (14)
- Choi, Steven S. Republican
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Mathis
- Smith
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Villapudua
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Nielsen
- Bates
- Dahle
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1773 do?
- The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, authorizes a city or county to enter into contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts and continuously appropriates General Fund moneys for that purpose. This bill, for the 2022–23 fiscal year, would appropriate an additional $40,000,000 from the General Fund to the Controller to make subvention payments to counties, as provided, in proportion to the losses incurred by those counties by reason of the reduction of assessed property taxes. The bill would make various findings in this regard.
- Who sponsors AB 1773?
- AB 1773 is sponsored by Choi, Steven S. (Republican), Gallagher, James (Republican), Mathis, Smith, Flora, Heath (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Villapudua, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Nielsen, Bates, Dahle, Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), Fong, Mike (Democratic), and Patterson, Joe (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 1773?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1773?
- Track AB 1773 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1773
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1773
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →