California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2958 — State Bar of California.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 419, Statutes of 2022.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 08, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. Existing law creates within the State Bar a Governance in the Public Interest Task Force, which is required to prepare and submit a report every 3 years that includes recommendations for enhancing the protection of the public and ensuring that protection of the public is the highest priority in the licensing, regulation, and discipline of attorneys, as specified. This bill would repeal those provisions establishing and imposing duties on the Governance in the Public Interest Task Force. (2) The State Bar is governed by a board of trustees. Existing law requires the board to consist of 13 members appointed by certain authorities for a term of 4 years, requires appointing authorities to fill vacancies, and limits the reappointment of certain members, as specified. Under this bill, the time served during the remainder of a midterm vacancy by any member appointed to fill that vacancy would not count toward any term limits for the member filling the vacancy. (3) Existing law prohibits the practice of law unless the person is an active licensee of the State Bar. This bill would require an entity of the State Bar exploring a regulatory sandbox or the licensing of nonattorneys as paraprofessionals to take specified actions, including prioritizing protecting individuals, especially those in need of legal assistance, from unscrupulous actors, including those actors seeking to do business in the legal field, above all else. The bill would require the State Bar to provide to the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary by January 15, 2023, a report containing specified information relating to funding spent since 2018 to study the creation of a regulatory sandbox or the licensing of nonattorneys as paraprofessionals. The bill, on January 1, 2025, would repeal the reporting requirement and would limit the application of the other requirements described above to an entity of the State Bar exploring a regulatory sandbox. (4) Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the board to charge an annual license fee for active licensees of up to $395 for 2022. Existing law requires the board to charge an annual license fee for inactive licensees of up to $97.40. This bill, commencing January 1, 2023, until January 1, 2024, would require the board to charge an annual license fee of up to $390, or $386 if certain conditions are met, for active licensees for 2023. The bill would also decrease, commencing January 1, 2023, the maximum for the annual license fee for inactive licensees to $96.40 if certain conditions are met. (5) Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the board to increase specified annual license fees by an additional $45, to be allocated as specified, unless the licensee elects not to support the specified activities. Existing law would decrease, commencing January 1, 2023, that additional fee from $45 to $40. This bill would revise the additional license fee so that the fee amount remains at $45 on and after January 1, 2023. The bill would require the board, until December 31, 2024, to allocate $5 of the $45 fee amount to qualified legal services projects or qualified support centers, as defined, to fund law student summer fellowships for purposes of supporting law students interested in pursuing a career in legal services for indigent persons, as described. (6) Existing law also requires the invoice provided to licensees for the payment of the annual license fee to provide the option to deduct $5 from the annual license fee if the licensee elects not to support lobbying and related activities by the State Bar outside of specified parameters. Existing law provides that the determination of costs for lobbying and related activities by the State Bar includes, but is not limited to, overhead and administrative costs. This bill would instead provide that at the election of the board, the invoice may provide each licensee the option of adding up to $5 to the annual fee if the licensee elects to support such lobbying and related activities by the State Bar. The bill would remove the provision stating that the determination of costs for lobbying and related activities by the State Bar includes, but is not limited to, overhead and administrative costs. The bill would make conforming changes. The bill would make these changes operative on January 1, 2023. (7) Existing law requires the net proceeds from the sale of real property, as described, to be held by the State Bar without expenditure or commitment for any purpose until approved by the Legislature by statute. This bill would require the net proceeds from the sale of the State Bar's San Francisco office building, as described, to be held by the State Bar without expenditure or commitment for any purpose until approved by the Legislature by statute, except as provided. (8) Existing law requires the California State Auditor's Office to conduct an independent audit to determine whether the State Bar's attorney complaint and discipline process adequately protects the public from misconduct by licensed attorneys or those who wrongfully hold themselves out as licensed attorneys, as specified. Existing law requires this audit to be submitted by April 15, 2022, to specified persons. This bill would remove those provisions. Existing law requires the board to contract with the California State Auditor's Office to conduct a performance audit of the State Bar's operations from July 1, 2000, to December 31, 2000, inclusive, as specified. Existing law requires the board, every two years thereafter, to contract with the California State Auditor's Office to conduct a performance audit of the State Bar's operations, commencing with January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2002, inclusive. This bill would, for the 2023 audit required by the provisions described above, require the California State Auditor's Office to conduct an audit, to be submitted to specified bodies by April 15, 2023, that evaluates each program or division of the State Bar receiving support from the annual State Bar licensing fees and other fees required of active and inactive licensees, including by conducting an assessment of how much fee revenue, staff, and resources are currently budgeted and subsequently expended to perform existing tasks and responsibilities, as specified. (9) Existing law requires the State Bar to actively engage in outreach activities to make licensees, the legal community, and the general public aware of the existence and availability of the Attorney Diversion and Assistance Program. This bill would require the outreach to include the development and certification of minimum continuing legal education courses relating to behavioral health issues and working in cooperation with organizations that provide services and support to attorneys with issues related to behavioral health. (10) Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, requires any agency, as defined, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information to disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data, as described. Under that act, any agency that maintains computerized data that includes personal information that the agency does not own is also required to notify the owner or licensee of the information of any breach of the security of the data following discovery, if the personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. Existing law sets forth requirements for the format and contents of the security breach notification. This bill would require the State Bar to comply with these disclosure requirements. (11) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1798.29 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 1711 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1711 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 419, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5981.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 4877.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 21).

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 4657.)

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  17. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 3).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  20. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee April 8.

  22. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Judiciary · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Judiciary

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 74 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32000
Unaffiliated 34005
Republican 8001
Total 74006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Levine — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20102
Democratic 11002
Republican 3001
Total 34105
% of votes cast 85%3%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Newman — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Bates — Nay
Roth — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Min — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7000
Unaffiliated 3000
Republican 1000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 65 Yea · 0 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 24006
Unaffiliated 35004
Republican 6003
Total 650013
% of votes cast 83%0%0%17%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Not Voting
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Not Voting
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2958 do?
(1) Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. Existing law creates within the State Bar a Governance in the Public Interest Task Force, which is required to prepare and submit a report every 3 years that includes recommendations for enhancing the protection of the public and ensuring that protection of the public is the highest priority in the licensing, regulation, and discipline of attorneys, as specified. This bill would repeal those provisions establishing and imposing duties on the Governance in the Public Interest Task Force. (2) The State Bar is governed by a board of trustees. Existing law requires the board to consist of 13 members appointed by certain authorities for a term of 4 years, requires appointing authorities to fill vacancies, and limits the reappointment of certain members, as specified. Under this bill, the time served during the remainder of a midterm vacancy by any member appointed to fill that vacancy would not count toward any term limits for the member filling the vacancy. (3) Existing law prohibits the practice of law unless the person is an active licensee of the State Bar. This bill would require an entity of the State Bar exploring a regulatory sandbox or the licensing of nonattorneys as paraprofessionals to take specified actions, including prioritizing protecting individuals, especially those in need of legal assistance, from unscrupulous actors, including those actors seeking to do business in the legal field, above all else. The bill would require the State Bar to provide to the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary by January 15, 2023, a report containing specified information relating to funding spent since 2018 to study the creation of a regulatory sandbox or the licensing of nonattorneys as paraprofessionals. The bill, on January 1, 2025, would repeal the reporting requirement and would limit the application of the other requirements described above to an entity of the State Bar exploring a regulatory sandbox. (4) Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the board to charge an annual license fee for active licensees of up to $395 for 2022. Existing law requires the board to charge an annual license fee for inactive licensees of up to $97.40. This bill, commencing January 1, 2023, until January 1, 2024, would require the board to charge an annual license fee of up to $390, or $386 if certain conditions are met, for active licensees for 2023. The bill would also decrease, commencing January 1, 2023, the maximum for the annual license fee for inactive licensees to $96.40 if certain conditions are met. (5) Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the board to increase specified annual license fees by an additional $45, to be allocated as specified, unless the licensee elects not to support the specified activities. Existing law would decrease, commencing January 1, 2023, that additional fee from $45 to $40. This bill would revise the additional license fee so that the fee amount remains at $45 on and after January 1, 2023. The bill would require the board, until December 31, 2024, to allocate $5 of the $45 fee amount to qualified legal services projects or qualified support centers, as defined, to fund law student summer fellowships for purposes of supporting law students interested in pursuing a career in legal services for indigent persons, as described. (6) Existing law also requires the invoice provided to licensees for the payment of the annual license fee to provide the option to deduct $5 from the annual license fee if the licensee elects not to support lobbying and related activities by the State Bar outside of specified parameters. Existing law provides that the determination of costs for lobbying and related activities by the State Bar includes, but is not limited to, overhead and administrative costs. This bill would instead provide that at the election of the board, the invoice may provide each licensee the option of adding up to $5 to the annual fee if the licensee elects to support such lobbying and related activities by the State Bar. The bill would remove the provision stating that the determination of costs for lobbying and related activities by the State Bar includes, but is not limited to, overhead and administrative costs. The bill would make conforming changes. The bill would make these changes operative on January 1, 2023. (7) Existing law requires the net proceeds from the sale of real property, as described, to be held by the State Bar without expenditure or commitment for any purpose until approved by the Legislature by statute. This bill would require the net proceeds from the sale of the State Bar's San Francisco office building, as described, to be held by the State Bar without expenditure or commitment for any purpose until approved by the Legislature by statute, except as provided. (8) Existing law requires the California State Auditor's Office to conduct an independent audit to determine whether the State Bar's attorney complaint and discipline process adequately protects the public from misconduct by licensed attorneys or those who wrongfully hold themselves out as licensed attorneys, as specified. Existing law requires this audit to be submitted by April 15, 2022, to specified persons. This bill would remove those provisions. Existing law requires the board to contract with the California State Auditor's Office to conduct a performance audit of the State Bar's operations from July 1, 2000, to December 31, 2000, inclusive, as specified. Existing law requires the board, every two years thereafter, to contract with the California State Auditor's Office to conduct a performance audit of the State Bar's operations, commencing with January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2002, inclusive. This bill would, for the 2023 audit required by the provisions described above, require the California State Auditor's Office to conduct an audit, to be submitted to specified bodies by April 15, 2023, that evaluates each program or division of the State Bar receiving support from the annual State Bar licensing fees and other fees required of active and inactive licensees, including by conducting an assessment of how much fee revenue, staff, and resources are currently budgeted and subsequently expended to perform existing tasks and responsibilities, as specified. (9) Existing law requires the State Bar to actively engage in outreach activities to make licensees, the legal community, and the general public aware of the existence and availability of the Attorney Diversion and Assistance Program. This bill would require the outreach to include the development and certification of minimum continuing legal education courses relating to behavioral health issues and working in cooperation with organizations that provide services and support to attorneys with issues related to behavioral health. (10) Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, requires any agency, as defined, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information to disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data, as described. Under that act, any agency that maintains computerized data that includes personal information that the agency does not own is also required to notify the owner or licensee of the information of any breach of the security of the data following discovery, if the personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. Existing law sets forth requirements for the format and contents of the security breach notification. This bill would require the State Bar to comply with these disclosure requirements. (11) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1798.29 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 1711 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1711 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 2958?
AB 2958 is sponsored by Committee on Judiciary.
What is the current status of AB 2958?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 08, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2958?
Track AB 2958 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2958

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2958

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →