Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 16 D cosponsors

SB 5993 — Prohibiting interest charges for new and unpaid medical debt.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 06, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (16 D).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

213 added · 61 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes to Senate Bill 5993 now prohibit charging any interest on new and unpaid medical debts starting after December 31, 2026. This is a shift from the previous version, which aimed to lower interest rates on medical debt rather than eliminate them altogether. This change is important because it helps ensure that individuals struggling with medical bills won't be burdened by accumulating interest, ultimately making it easier for them to repay their debts without facing increasing financial pressure.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5993 (Corrected Copy) State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Alvarado, Riccelli, Bateman, Conway, Frame, Hasegawa, Liias, Lovelett, Lovick, Nobles, Orwall, Slatter, Stanford, Trudeau, Valdez, and C.
S-3585.1 SENATE BILL 5993 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Alvarado, Riccelli, Bateman, Conway, Frame, Hasegawa, Liias, Lovelett, Lovick, Nobles, Orwall, Slatter, Stanford, Trudeau, Valdez, and C.
Wilson) READ FIRST TIME 01/23/26.
Wilson Prefiled 01/06/26.
AN ACT Relating to lowering the interest rate for medical debt;
Read first time 01/12/26.
and amending RCW 19.52.010.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
AN ACT Relating to prohibiting interest charges for new and unpaid medical debt;
and amending RCW 19.52.010, 6.17.020, 4.56.190, and 4.56.210.
(2)(a) ((Prejudgment)) For any medical debt accrued after December 31, 2026, interest may not be charged or collected ((on)) in excess of a simple interest rate of one percent per year on new p.
(2)(((a) Prejudgment interest)) Interest may not be charged or collected on new or unpaid medical debt((, as defined in RCW p.
1 ESSB 5993 medical debt, as defined in RCW 19.16.100, ((must not exceed nine percent)) whether before or after entry of judgment.
1 SB 5993 19.16.100, must not exceed nine percent)) after the effective date of this section.
(b) ((For any medical debt for which prejudgment interest has accrued or may be accruing as of July 28, 2019, no prejudgment interest in excess of nine percent shall accrue thereafter)) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, interest may not be charged or collected on medical debt during any period in which:
(((b) For any medical debt for which prejudgment interest has accrued or may be accruing as of July 28, 2019, no prejudgment interest in excess of nine percent shall accrue thereafter.)) (3) A lease shall not be considered a loan or forbearance for the purposes of this chapter if:
(i) The hospital has not completed any required charity care screening and initial determination conducted in compliance with chapter 70.170 RCW;
(ii) The medical debt is later determined to be invalid or not lawfully owed;
or (iii) The medical debt is later determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or by operation of law to be not legally enforceable.
(c) If a medical debt is later reduced or eliminated under chapter 70.170 RCW, or is later determined to be invalid, not lawfully owed, or not legally enforceable, any interest charged or collected on or after the effective date of this section on the portion of the medical debt reduced or eliminated is void and must be refunded.
(3) A lease shall not be considered a loan or forbearance for the purposes of this chapter if:
Sec.
2.
RCW 6.17.020 and 2022 c 260 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Except as provided in subsections (2), (3), and (4) of this section, the party in whose favor a judgment of a court has been or may be filed or rendered, or the assignee or the current holder thereof, may have an execution, garnishment, or other legal process issued for the collection or enforcement of the judgment at any time within 10 years from entry of the judgment or the filing of the judgment in this state.
(2) After July 23, 1989, a party who obtains a judgment or order of a court or an administrative order entered as defined in RCW 74.20A.020(6) for accrued child support, or the assignee or the current holder thereof, may have an execution, garnishment, or other legal process issued upon that judgment or order at any time within 10 years of the 18th birthday of the youngest child named in the order for whom support is ordered.
(3) After June 9, 1994, a party in whose favor a judgment has been filed as a foreign judgment or rendered pursuant to subsection (1) or (4) of this section, or the assignee or the current holder thereof, may, within 90 days before the expiration of the original 10-year period, apply to the court that rendered the judgment or to p.
2 SB 5993 the court where the judgment was filed as a foreign judgment for an order granting an additional 10 years during which an execution, garnishment, or other legal process may be issued.
If a district court judgment of this state is transcribed to a superior court of this state, the original district court judgment shall not be extended and any petition under this section to extend the judgment that has been transcribed to superior court shall be filed in the superior court within 90 days before the expiration of the 10-year period of the date the transcript of the district court judgment was filed in the superior court of this state.
The petitioner shall pay to the court a filing fee equal to the filing fee for filing the first or initial paper in a civil action in the court, except in the case of district court judgments transcribed to superior court, where the filing fee shall be the fee for filing the first or initial paper in a civil action in the superior court where the judgment was transcribed.
The order granting the application shall contain an updated judgment summary as provided in RCW 4.64.030.
The filing fee required under this subsection shall be included in the judgment summary and shall be a recoverable cost.
The application shall be granted as a matter of right, subject to review only for timeliness, factual issues of full or partial satisfaction, or errors in calculating the judgment summary amounts.
(4)(a) A party who obtains a judgment or order for restitution pursuant to a criminal judgment and sentence, or the assignee or the current holder thereof, may execute, garnish, and/or have legal process issued upon the judgment or order any time within 10 years subsequent to the entry of the judgment and sentence or 10 years following the offender's release from total confinement as provided in chapter 9.94A RCW.
The clerk of (([the])) the superior court, or a party designated by the clerk, may seek extension under subsection (3) of this section for purposes of collection as allowed under RCW 36.18.190, provided that no filing fee shall be required.
(b) A party who obtains a judgment or order for court-ordered legal financial obligations other than restitution, pursuant to a criminal judgment and sentence, or the assignee or the current holder thereof, may execute, garnish, and have legal process issued upon the judgment or order any time within 10 years subsequent to the entry of the judgment and sentence or 10 years following the offender's release from total confinement as provided in chapter 9.94A RCW.
The clerk of (([the])) the superior court, or a party designated by the p.
3 SB 5993 clerk, may seek extension under subsection (3) of this section for purposes of collection as allowed under RCW 36.18.190, only if the court finds that the offender has the current or likely future ability to pay the nonrestitution legal financial obligations.
A person does not have the current ability to pay if the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.01.160(3).
No filing fee shall be required for filing a petition for an extension pursuant to this subsection (4)(b).
(5) "Court" as used in this section includes but is not limited to the United States supreme court, the United States courts of appeals, the United States district courts, the United States bankruptcy courts, the Washington state supreme court, the court of appeals of the state of Washington, superior courts and district courts of the counties of the state of Washington, and courts of other states and jurisdictions from which judgment has been filed in this state under chapter 6.36 ((or 6.40)) RCW.
(6) The perfection of any judgment lien and the priority of that judgment lien on property as established by RCW 6.13.090 and chapter 4.56 RCW is not altered by the extension of the judgment pursuant to the provisions of this section and the lien remains in full force and effect and does not have to be rerecorded after it is extended.
Continued perfection of a judgment that has been transcribed to other counties and perfected in those counties may be accomplished after extension of the judgment by filing with the clerk of the other counties where the judgment has been filed either a certified copy of the order extending the judgment or a certified copy of the docket of the matter where the judgment was extended.
(7) Except as ordered in RCW 4.16.020 (2) or (3), chapter 9.94A RCW, or chapter 13.40 RCW, no judgment is enforceable for a period exceeding 20 years from the date of entry in the originating court.
Nothing in this section may be interpreted to extend the expiration date of a foreign judgment beyond the expiration date under the laws of the jurisdiction where the judgment originated.
(8) The chapter 261, Laws of 2002 amendments to this section apply to all judgments currently in effect on June 13, 2002, to all judgments extended after June 9, 1994, unless the judgment has been satisfied, vacated, and/or quashed, and to all judgments filed or rendered, or both, after June 13, 2002.
(9) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if a judgment includes any amount of medical debt as defined in RCW p.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
Previous
Latest
4 SB 5993 19.16.100, execution, garnishment, or any other legal process for enforcement of the judgment may be issued only within six years from the date of entry.
(a) The extension procedure authorized under subsection (3) of this section does not apply to judgments that include medical debt as defined in RCW 19.16.100.
(b) After expiration of the six-year period, the judgment is unenforceable and no execution, garnishment, renewal, revival, or other legal process may issue.
(c) A judgment includes medical debt if any portion of the principal amount of the judgment at the time of entry consists of medical debt as defined in RCW 19.16.100.
Sec.
3.
RCW 4.56.190 and 2011 c 106 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
The real estate of any judgment debtor, and such as the judgment debtor may acquire, not exempt by law, shall be held and bound to satisfy any judgment of the district court of the United States rendered in this state and any judgment of the supreme court, court of appeals, superior court, or district court of this state, and every such judgment shall be a lien thereupon to commence as provided in RCW 4.56.200 and to run for a period of not to exceed ten years from the day on which such judgment was entered unless the ten-year period is extended in accordance with RCW 6.17.020(3), or unless the judgment results from a criminal sentence for a crime that was committed on or after July 1, 2000, in which case the lien will remain in effect until the judgment is fully satisfied.
As used in this chapter, real estate shall not include the vendor's interest under a real estate contract for judgments rendered after August 23, 1983.
If a judgment debtor owns real estate, subject to execution, jointly or in common with any other person, the judgment shall be a lien on the interest of the defendant only.
Personal property of the judgment debtor shall be held only from the time it is actually levied upon.
However, if a judgment includes any amount arising from medical debt as defined in RCW 19.16.100, the lien continues for no more than six years from the date of entry and may not be extended.
Sec.
4.
RCW 4.56.210 and 1995 c 75 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
p.
5 SB 5993 (1) Except as provided in subsections (2) ((and)), (3), and (4) of this section, after the expiration of ten years from the date of the entry of any judgment heretofore or hereafter rendered in this state, it shall cease to be a lien or charge against the estate or person of the judgment debtor.
No suit, action or other proceeding shall ever be had on any judgment rendered in this state by which the lien shall be extended or continued in force for any greater or longer period than ten years.
(2) An underlying judgment or judgment lien entered after ((the effective date of this act)) July 23, 1989, for accrued child support shall continue in force for ten years after the eighteenth birthday of the youngest child named in the order for whom support is ordered.
All judgments entered after ((the effective date of this act)) July 23, 1989, shall contain the birthdate of the youngest child for whom support is ordered.
(3) A lien based upon an underlying judgment continues in force for an additional ten-year period if the period of execution for the underlying judgment is extended under RCW 6.17.020.
(4) A lien arising from a judgment that includes any amount of medical debt as defined in RCW 19.16.100 expires six years from the date of entry of the judgment and may not be renewed, revived, or extended.
The extension procedure under RCW 6.17.020(3) does not apply to such liens.
2 ESSB 5993
6 SB 5993
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  3. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  4. Minority; do not pass.

  5. CRJ - Majority; do pass.

  6. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  7. Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.

  8. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 29; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  12. 1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 26).

  13. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  14. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  15. Minority; without recommendation.

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  19. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  20. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

  21. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 135 not signed on · 33 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (135)

135 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 135 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

549 Wagoner Pg 1 Ln 20 (#6)

Failed 19 Yea · 29 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02901
Republican 19000
Total 192901
% of votes cast 39%59%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Claire Wilson Democrat Nay
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Nay
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Nay
Derek Stanford Democrat Nay
Drew Hansen Democrat Nay
Emily Alvarado Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Nay
Jesse Salomon Democrat Nay
Jessica Bateman Democrat Nay
John Lovick Democrat Nay
June Robinson Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Liz Lovelett Democrat Not Voting
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Mike Chapman Democrat Nay
Noel Frame Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
T'wina Nobles Democrat Nay
Tina Orwall Democrat Nay
Vandana Slatter Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Nay
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 29 Yea · 19 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 29001
Republican 01900
Total 291901
% of votes cast 59%39%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Not Voting
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Nay
Curtis King Republican Nay
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jeff Wilson Republican Nay
Jim McCune Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Leonard Christian Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Perry Dozier Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Ron Muzzall Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5993?
SB 5993 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), Yasmin Trudeau (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Vandana Slatter (Democrat), Tina Orwall (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), John Lovick (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Marko Liias (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Noel Frame (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Jessica Bateman (Democrat), Marcus Riccelli (Democrat), Emily Alvarado (Democrat), and Javier Valdez (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5993?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 06, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 5993?
Track SB 5993 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5993

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5993

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →