Prohibiting activities related to the production and manufacturing of fur products.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1775 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1775.
You're tracking HB 1775
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1775 — Prohibiting activities related to the production and manufacturing of fur products.
Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 03, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
127 added · 118 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made in Bill HB 1775 involve simplifying regulations concerning the fur industry in Washington State. The updated version removes specific sections of old law that regulated fur farming and includes new provisions aimed at addressing animal welfare issues, reflecting a growing concern about how fur-producing animals are treated. This shift matters because it aims to better protect animal welfare while acknowledging the declining demand for fur products, suggesting a move towards more ethical practices in consumer goods.
H-1543.2H-0010.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1775 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Agriculture & Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Walen, Parshley, Ramel, Springer, Peterson, Fosse, Ormsby, Pollet, Macri, Hill, and Leavitt)Leavitt READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/21/25.02/03/25.
Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources.
amending RCW 16.72.01016.72.010; and 16.72.020;
creating a new section;
repealing RCW 16.72.020, 16.72.030, and 16.72.040;
NEW SECTION.
(1) The legislature finds that the demand for products made of animal fur has been in decline and that the fur industry represents a very small portion of Washington's economy.
For example, according to the United States department of agriculture, mink pelt production decreased 15 percent from 2018 to 2019, and the value of mink pelts produced decreased 30 percent in the same time frame.
In Washington, mink pelt production accounted for only 1.4 percent of total production in the United States in 2018, decreasing to less than one percent in 2019.
(2) The legislature finds that there are growing concerns for the welfare of the animals used in fur farming.
For instance, there are no federal or state humane slaughter laws that regulate the industry.
In addition, there are significant concerns related to the environmental impact of fur farming.
For these and other reasons, the p.
1 HB 1775 legislature finds that it is in the public interest to end fur trading and farming.
(3) Recognizing the harmful impacts on animals and the environment, the legislature intends to end fur farming, to provide assistance to existing farmers transitioning to other types of farming or livelihood, and to end the production and manufacture of fur products in Washington by 2026.
Sec.
2.
"Director" means director of agriculture.))agriculture. The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(1) "Department" means the department of agriculture.agriculture.)) The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(2)(1) "Director""Fur" means theany directoranimal ofskin agriculture.or part thereof with hair, fleece, or fur fibers attached thereto, either in its raw or processed state.
(3)(2) "Fur""Fur farming" means anybreeding, animalraising, skinand orrearing partof thereofmink, withmarten, hair,fox, fleece,and orchinchilla fur fibers attached thereto, either in itscaptivity raw or processedenclosures. state.
(4)(3)(a) "Fur farming"product" means breeding,any raising,article andof rearingclothing or covering for any part of mink,the marten,body, fox,or any fashion accessory including, but not limited to, handbags, shoes, slippers, hats, earmuffs, scarves, shawls, gloves, jewelry, keychains, toys or trinkets, and chinchillahome accessories and decor, that is made in captivitywhole or enclosures.in part of fur.
(5)(a) "Fur product" means any article of clothing or covering for any part of the body, or any fashion accessory including, but not p.
1 SHB 1775 limited to, handbags, shoes, slippers, hats, earmuffs, scarves, shawls, gloves, jewelry, keychains, toys or trinkets, and home accessories and decor, that is made in whole or in part of fur.
(6)(4) "Person" includes any individual, firm corporation, trust, association, copartnership, society, or other organization of individuals and any other business unit, devicedevice, , or arrangement.
(7)(5) "Produce or manufacture" means to engage in any activity related to processing raw materials to create a fur product for distribution or sale.
(8)p. "Taxidermy" means the practice of preparing, stuffing, and mounting the skin, in lifelike form, of any fish, reptile, amphibian, bird, or mammal.
(9)2 "UltimateHB consumer"1775 (6) "Taxidermy" means athe personpractice whoof buyspreparing, forstuffing, theirand ownmounting use,the orskin, forin thelifelike useform, of another,any butfish, notreptile, foramphibian, resalebird, or trade.mammal.
(10)(7) "Used"Ultimate furconsumer" product" means fura inperson anywho formbuys thatfor hastheir beenown wornuse, or usedfor bythe anuse ultimateof consumer.another, but not for resale or trade.
(8) "Used fur product" means fur in any form that has been worn or used by an ultimate consumer.
2.3.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a person may notneither produceparticipate orin manufacturefur afarming, furnor product,produce or fur-relatedmanufacture product,a made from farmed fur unlessproduct. the fur is sourced from a farm that is a member of an organization that recognizes a professional certification program that includes animal welfare and environmental standards, and is fully in compliance with inspection and certification requirements.
p.(b) A fur product used for traditional tribal, cultural, or spiritual purposes by a member of a federally recognized Native American tribe;
2 SHB 1775 (b) A fur product used for traditional tribal, cultural, or spiritual purposes by a member of a federally recognized Native American tribe;
and (d) TheA manufactureproduct ofwhere furall productsof tothe befur used in fishingits gear;production is from a used fur product.
and (e) A product where all of the fur used in its production is from a used fur product.
3.4.
Grant funds may be used only for technical assistance, permitting, new facility construction, equipment,p. and labor costs associated with transitioning out of fur farming.
3 HB 1775 equipment, and labor costs associated with transitioning out of fur farming.
4.5.
Show all 58 changed lines (18 more)
Expenditures from the account may be used only for the fur farm transition grant program established in section 34 of this act.
Only the director of the department of agriculture or p.the director's designee may authorize expenditures from the account.
3 SHB 1775 the director's designee may authorize expenditures from the account.
Sec.
5.
RCW 16.72.020 and 1955 c 321 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Fur farming shall be deemed an agricultural pursuit and the director is hereby authorized to exercise quarantine controls over such farms in accordance with the provisions of this title.
Facilities available to the department may be used by the director in carrying out the provisions of this chapter.
(2) A person may not engage in fur farming unless the person is a member of an organization that recognizes a professional certification program that includes animal welfare and environmental standards, and is fully in compliance with inspection and certification requirements.
SectionsThe 1,following 2,acts andor 5parts of thisacts actare takeeach effectrepealed: January 1, 2026.
(1) RCW 16.72.020 (Quarantine controls) and 1955 c 321 s 3;
(2) RCW 16.72.030 (Fox, mink, marten declared personalty) and 1955 c 321 s 4;
and (3) RCW 16.72.040 (Branding — Recording) and 1955 c 321 s 5.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
Sections 1 through 3 and 6 of this act take effect January 1, 2026.
4 SHBHB 1775
Show all 58 changed rows (18 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
AGNR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Agriculture & Natural Resources.
Sponsors
- Mari Leavitt · Cosponsor
- Natasha Hill · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
- Mary Fosse · Cosponsor
- Strom Peterson · Cosponsor
- Larry Springer · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- Lisa Parshley · Cosponsor
- Amy Walen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Amy Walen Democrat
Co-sponsors (10)
- Mari Leavitt Democrat
- Natasha Hill Democrat
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Timm Ormsby Democrat
- Mary Fosse Democrat
- Strom Peterson Democrat
- Larry Springer Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
- Lisa Parshley Democrat
Not signed on (140)
140 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 140 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1775?
- HB 1775 is sponsored by Mari Leavitt (Democrat), Natasha Hill (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Larry Springer (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), and Amy Walen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1775?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 03, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1775?
- Track HB 1775 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1775
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1775
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →