Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 6 R cosponsors

SB 5729 — Encouraging construction of affordable housing by streamlining the permitting process.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

189 added · 138 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to SB 5729 focus on improving Washington's building permit process to address the state's housing crisis. The bill now emphasizes reducing costs and expediting permit approvals, thus aiming to encourage the construction of more housing units. By streamlining the review process, local governments are required to provide a determination regarding permit applications more quickly, allowing development projects to move forward without unnecessary delays. This is significant because it could lead to more housing becoming available sooner, helping alleviate the housing shortage in the state.

→
Previous
Latest
S-1348.1 SENATE BILL 5729 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Gildon, Dozier, and Fortunato Read first time 02/11/25.
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5729 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Gildon, Dozier, and Fortunato Read first time 02/11/25.
amending RCW 36.70B.030, 36.70B.050, and 36.70B.140;
amending RCW 36.70B.070, 36.70B.050, 36.70B.140, and 18.43.035;
RCW 36.70B.030 and 1995 c 347 s 404 are each amended to read as follows:
RCW 36.70B.070 and 2023 c 338 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and development regulations shall serve as the foundation for project review.
(1)(a) Within 28 days after receiving a project permit application, a local government planning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 shall provide a written determination to the applicant.
The review of a proposed project's consistency with applicable development regulations, or in the absence of applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.70B.040 shall incorporate the determinations under this section.
(b) The written determination must state either:
(i) That the application is complete;
or (ii) That the application is incomplete and that the procedural submission requirements of the local government have not been met.
1 SB 5729 (2) During project review, a local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall determine whether the items listed in this subsection are defined in the development regulations applicable to the proposed project or, in the absence of applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan.
1 ESB 5729 The determination shall outline what is necessary to make the application procedurally complete.
At a minimum, such applicable regulations or plans shall be determinative of the:
(c) The number of days shall be calculated by counting every calendar day.
(a) Type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be allowed under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments and conditional and special uses, if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied;
(d) To the extent known by the local government, the local government shall identify other agencies of local, state, or federal governments that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of the application.
(b) Density of residential development in urban growth areas;
(2) A project permit application is complete for purposes of this section when it meets the procedural submission requirements of the local government, as outlined on the project permit application.
and (c) Availability and adequacy of public facilities identified in the comprehensive plan, if the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these facilities as required by chapter 36.70A RCW.
Additional information or studies may be required or project modifications may be undertaken subsequent to the procedural review of the application by the local government.
(3) During project review, the local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall not reexamine alternatives to or hear appeals on the items identified in subsection (2) of this section, except for issues of code interpretation.
The determination of completeness shall not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur.
As part of its project review process, a local government shall provide a procedure for obtaining a code interpretation as provided in RCW 36.70B.110.
However, if the procedural submission requirements, as outlined on the project permit application have been provided, the need for additional information or studies may not preclude a completeness determination.
(4) Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.240, a local government may determine that the requirements for environmental analysis and mitigation measures in development regulations and other applicable laws provide adequate mitigation for some or all of the project's specific adverse environmental impacts to which the requirements apply.
(3) The determination of completeness may include or be combined with the following:
(5) Nothing in this section limits the authority of a permitting agency to approve, condition, or deny a project as provided in its development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW and in its policies adopted under RCW 43.21C.060.
(a) A preliminary determination of those development regulations that will be used for project mitigation;
Project review shall be used to identify specific project design and conditions relating to the character of development, such as the details of site plans, curb cuts, drainage swales, transportation demand management, the payment of impact fees, or other measures to mitigate a proposal's probable adverse environmental impacts, if applicable.
(b) A preliminary determination of consistency, as provided under RCW 36.70B.040;
(6) Any building permit applications submitted with plans, computations, or specifications prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer or architect meeting the requirements under subsection (7) of this section, licensed under the laws of the state of Washington, in the specific discipline as appropriate, is deemed p.
(c) Other information the local government chooses to include;
2 SB 5729 complete by the city or county building department with authority under RCW 19.27.050.
or (d) The notice of application pursuant to the requirements in RCW 36.70B.110.
The department may review the application for general compliance with the zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect and may not impose substantial modifications or conditions on submittals prepared, stamped, and signed by a licensed architect, landscape architect, soils engineer, civil engineer, structural engineer, or combination thereof.
(4)(a) An application shall be deemed procedurally complete on the 29th day after receiving a project permit application under this section if the local government does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is procedurally incomplete as provided in subsection (1)(b)(ii) of this section.
(7) The professional engineer or architect must maintain professional liability errors and omissions insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 executed by an insurer authorized to do business in Washington state.
When the local government does not provide a written determination, they may still seek additional information or studies as provided for in subsection (2) of this section.
(8) Subsections (1) through (4) of this section apply only to local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040.
(b) Within 14 days after an applicant has submitted to a local government additional information identified by the local government p.
2 ESB 5729 as being necessary for a complete application, the local government shall notify the applicant whether the application is complete or what additional information is necessary.
(c) The notice of application shall be provided within 14 days after the determination of completeness pursuant to RCW 36.70B.110.
(5)(a) Any project permit applications submitted with plans, computations, or specifications prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer or architect meeting the requirements under (b) of this subsection, licensed under the laws of the state of Washington, in the specific discipline as appropriate, is deemed complete under this section by the city or county building department with authority under RCW 19.27.050.
Additional information or studies may be required or project modifications undertaken subsequent to the procedural review of the application by the local government.
The determination of completeness may not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur.
If the procedural submission requirements as outlined on the project permit application have been provided, the need for additional information or studies may not preclude a completeness determination.
(b) The professional engineer or architect must maintain professional liability errors and omissions insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 executed by an insurer authorized to do business in the state of Washington, as determined by rule by the board of registration for professional engineers and land surveyors.
(c)(i) A county or city may not approve a building permit application that does not comply with the development regulations in effect, including those required by state or federal law.
(ii) A county or city may not approve a building permit application that does not comply with the housing affordability requirements adopted by a county or city.
(d) The department may review the application for compliance and consistency with the current building codes, zoning, critical areas, shoreline master plan documentation, or other land use control ordinances in effect.
(1) Not later than March 31, 1996, each local government shall provide by ordinance or resolution for review of project permit applications to achieve the following objectives:
p.
3 ESB 5729 (1) Not later than March 31, 1996, each local government shall provide by ordinance or resolution for review of project permit applications to achieve the following objectives:
(2) A project permit application that is consistent with adopted development regulations and within the capacity of system-wide infrastructure improvement is deemed approved following three reviews or requests for additional information by the local government unless clear violation of substantive and procedural requirements is demonstrated by the reviewing local government.
(2) A project permit application that is consistent with adopted development regulations, including critical area ordinances, and within the capacity of public facilities is deemed approved following six reviews or requests for additional information by the local government unless clear violation of substantive and procedural requirements is demonstrated by the reviewing local government.
Nothing in this subsection removes a local government's requirements to comply with the remainder of this chapter.
This subsection does not apply to:
(a) Project permit applications required to be approved by hearing examiners or legislative bodies;
or (b) Project permit applications required by state or federal law.
Landmark designations, street vacations, or other approvals relating to the use of public areas or facilities, or other project permits, whether administrative or quasi-judicial, that the local government by p.
Landmark designations, street vacations, or other approvals relating to the use of public areas or facilities, or other project permits, whether administrative or quasi-judicial, that the local government by ordinance or resolution has determined present special circumstances that warrant a review process or time periods for approval which are different from that provided in RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
Previous
Latest
3 SB 5729 ordinance or resolution has determined present special circumstances that warrant a review process or time periods for approval which are different from that provided in RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.
Lot line or boundary adjustments and building and other construction permits, or similar administrative approvals, categorically exempt from environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits.
Lot line or boundary adjustments and building and other construction permits, or similar administrative approvals, categorically exempt from environmental p.
4 ESB 5729 review under chapter 43.21C RCW, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits.
or (ii) The expansion or remodeling of existing buildings, structures, or development is located in a critical area or in cases where two or more duplexes will be built on the same lot;
(ii) The expansion or remodeling of existing buildings, structures, or development is outside the critical area or critical area buffers;
or (iii) In cases where two or more duplexes will be built on the same lot;
(((5))) (6) For purposes of this section, "interior alterations" include construction activities that do not modify the existing site layout or its current use and involve no exterior work adding to the building footprint.
Sec.
5.
RCW 18.43.035 and 2020 c 47 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
4 SB 5729 (((5))) (6) For purposes of this section, "interior alterations" include construction activities that do not modify the existing site layout or its current use and involve no exterior work adding to the building footprint.
5 ESB 5729 (1) The board may adopt and amend bylaws establishing its organization and method of operation, including but not limited to meetings, maintenance of books and records, publication of reports, code of ethics, and rosters, and adoption and use of a seal.
(2) Four members of the board shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of any business of the board.
(3) The board shall appoint its director, who must hold a valid Washington license as a professional engineer or professional land surveyor.
(4) The board may employ such persons as are necessary to carry out its duties under this chapter.
(5) It may adopt rules reasonably necessary to administer the provisions of this chapter and RCW 36.70B.070(5)(b).
The board shall submit to the governor periodic reports as may be required.
A roster, showing the names and places of business of all registered professional engineers and land surveyors may be published for distribution, upon request, to professional engineers and land surveyors registered under this chapter and to the public.
5 SB 5729
6 ESB 5729
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  3. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  4. LG - Majority; do pass.

  5. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 8:00 AM.

  6. Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.

  7. First reading, referred to Local Government.

  8. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  9. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  10. 1st substitute bill substituted (HSG 26).

  11. Returned to second reading for amendment.

  12. Rules suspended.

  13. Placed on third reading by Rules Committee.

  14. Passed to Rules Committee for third reading.

  15. HSG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.

  17. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.

  18. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. On motion, referred to Housing.

  19. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  20. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  21. Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.

  22. First reading, referred to Local Government.

  23. Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  24. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  25. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  26. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  27. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  28. HSG - Majority; do pass.

  29. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.

  30. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.

  31. First reading, referred to Housing.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 29100
Republican 19000
Total 48100
% of votes cast 98%2%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 47 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 28200
Republican 19000
Total 47200
% of votes cast 96%4%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5729?
SB 5729 is sponsored by Phil Fortunato (Republican), Perry Dozier (Republican), and Chris Gildon (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 5729?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 5729?
Track SB 5729 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5729

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5729

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →