SB 5729 — Encouraging construction of affordable housing by streamlining the permitting process.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
189 added · 138 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to SB 5729 focus on improving Washington's building permit process to address the state's housing crisis. The bill now emphasizes reducing costs and expediting permit approvals, thus aiming to encourage the construction of more housing units. By streamlining the review process, local governments are required to provide a determination regarding permit applications more quickly, allowing development projects to move forward without unnecessary delays. This is significant because it could lead to more housing becoming available sooner, helping alleviate the housing shortage in the state.
S-1348.1ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5729 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Gildon, Dozier, and Fortunato Read first time 02/11/25.
amending RCW 36.70B.030,36.70B.070, 36.70B.050, 36.70B.140, and 36.70B.140;18.43.035;
RCW 36.70B.03036.70B.070 and 19952023 c 347338 s 4046 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)(1)(a) FundamentalWithin land28 usedays planningafter choicesreceiving madea inproject adoptedpermit comprehensiveapplication, plansa andlocal developmentgovernment regulationsplanning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 shall serveprovide asa thewritten foundationdetermination forto projectthe review.applicant.
(b) The reviewwritten ofdetermination amust proposedstate project'seither: consistency with applicable development regulations, or in the absence of applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.70B.040 shall incorporate the determinations under this section.
(i) That the application is complete;
or (ii) That the application is incomplete and that the procedural submission requirements of the local government have not been met.
1 SBESB 5729 (2)The Duringdetermination project review, a local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall determineoutline whetherwhat theis itemsnecessary listed in this subsection are defined in the development regulations applicable to themake proposed project or, in the absenceapplication ofprocedurally applicablecomplete. regulations the adopted comprehensive plan.
At(c) aThe minimum,number suchof applicabledays regulationsshall orbe planscalculated shallby becounting determinativeevery ofcalendar the:day.
(a)(d) TypeTo ofthe landextent useknown permittedby at the site,local includinggovernment, usesthe thatlocal maygovernment beshall allowedidentify underother certainagencies circumstances,of suchlocal, asstate, plannedor unitfederal developmentsgovernments andthat conditionalmay andhave specialjurisdiction uses,over ifsome theaspect criteriaof forthe theirapplication. approval have been satisfied;
(b)(2) DensityA project permit application is complete for purposes of residentialthis developmentsection inwhen urbanit growthmeets areas;the procedural submission requirements of the local government, as outlined on the project permit application.
andAdditional (c)information Availabilityor andstudies adequacymay ofbe publicrequired facilitiesor identifiedproject inmodifications themay comprehensivebe plan,undertaken ifsubsequent to the planprocedural orreview development regulations provide for funding of thesethe facilitiesapplication as required by chapterthe 36.70Alocal RCW.government.
(3)The Duringdetermination projectof review,completeness shall not preclude the local government orfrom anyrequesting subsequentadditional reviewinginformation bodyor shallstudies noteither reexamineat alternativesthe totime orof hearthe appealsnotice onof thecompleteness itemsor identifiedsubsequently inif subsectionnew (2)information ofis thisrequired section,or exceptsubstantial forchanges issuesin ofthe codeproposed interpretation.action occur.
AsHowever, partif ofthe itsprocedural projectsubmission reviewrequirements, process,as aoutlined localon governmentthe shallproject providepermit aapplication procedurehave been provided, the need for obtainingadditional ainformation codeor interpretationstudies asmay providednot inpreclude RCWa 36.70B.110.completeness determination.
(4)(3) PursuantThe todetermination RCWof 43.21C.240,completeness a local government may determineinclude that the requirements for environmental analysis and mitigation measures in development regulations and other applicable laws provide adequate mitigation for some or allbe ofcombined thewith project's specific adverse environmental impacts to which the requirementsfollowing: apply.
(5)(a) NothingA inpreliminary thisdetermination section limits the authority of athose permitting agency to approve, condition, or deny a project as provided in its development regulations adoptedthat underwill chapterbe 36.70Aused RCWfor andproject inmitigation; its policies adopted under RCW 43.21C.060.
Project(b) reviewA shallpreliminary bedetermination used to identify specific project design and conditions relating to the character of development,consistency, such as theprovided detailsunder ofRCW site36.70B.040; plans, curb cuts, drainage swales, transportation demand management, the payment of impact fees, or other measures to mitigate a proposal's probable adverse environmental impacts, if applicable.
(6)(c) AnyOther buildinginformation permit applications submitted with plans, computations, or specifications prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer or architect meeting the requirementslocal undergovernment subsectionchooses (7)to ofinclude; this section, licensed under the laws of the state of Washington, in the specific discipline as appropriate, is deemed p.
2or SB(d) 5729The completenotice byof theapplication citypursuant orto countythe buildingrequirements departmentin with authority under RCW 19.27.050.36.70B.110.
The(4)(a) departmentAn mayapplication reviewshall thebe applicationdeemed forprocedurally generalcomplete complianceon with the zoning29th orday otherafter landreceiving usea controlproject ordinancespermit inapplication effectunder andthis maysection notif imposethe substantiallocal modificationsgovernment ordoes conditionsnot onprovide submittalsa prepared,written stamped,determination andto signedthe byapplicant athat licensedthe architect,application landscapeis architect,procedurally soilsincomplete engineer,as civilprovided engineer,in structuralsubsection engineer,(1)(b)(ii) orof combinationthis thereof.section.
(7)When Thethe professionallocal engineergovernment ordoes architectnot mustprovide maintaina professionalwritten liabilitydetermination, errorsthey andmay omissionsstill insuranceseek inadditional aninformation amountor ofstudies notas lessprovided thanfor $1,000,000in executedsubsection by(2) anof insurerthis authorizedsection. to do business in Washington state.
(8)(b) SubsectionsWithin (1)14 throughdays (4)after ofan thisapplicant sectionhas applysubmitted only to a local governmentsgovernment planningadditional underinformation RCWidentified 36.70A.040.by the local government p.
2 ESB 5729 as being necessary for a complete application, the local government shall notify the applicant whether the application is complete or what additional information is necessary.
(c) The notice of application shall be provided within 14 days after the determination of completeness pursuant to RCW 36.70B.110.
(5)(a) Any project permit applications submitted with plans, computations, or specifications prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer or architect meeting the requirements under (b) of this subsection, licensed under the laws of the state of Washington, in the specific discipline as appropriate, is deemed complete under this section by the city or county building department with authority under RCW 19.27.050.
Additional information or studies may be required or project modifications undertaken subsequent to the procedural review of the application by the local government.
The determination of completeness may not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur.
If the procedural submission requirements as outlined on the project permit application have been provided, the need for additional information or studies may not preclude a completeness determination.
(b) The professional engineer or architect must maintain professional liability errors and omissions insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 executed by an insurer authorized to do business in the state of Washington, as determined by rule by the board of registration for professional engineers and land surveyors.
(c)(i) A county or city may not approve a building permit application that does not comply with the development regulations in effect, including those required by state or federal law.
(ii) A county or city may not approve a building permit application that does not comply with the housing affordability requirements adopted by a county or city.
(d) The department may review the application for compliance and consistency with the current building codes, zoning, critical areas, shoreline master plan documentation, or other land use control ordinances in effect.
(1)p. Not later than March 31, 1996, each local government shall provide by ordinance or resolution for review of project permit applications to achieve the following objectives:
3 ESB 5729 (1) Not later than March 31, 1996, each local government shall provide by ordinance or resolution for review of project permit applications to achieve the following objectives:
(2) A project permit application that is consistent with adopted development regulationsregulations, including critical area ordinances, and within the capacity of system-widepublic infrastructurefacilities improvement is deemed approved following threesix reviews or requests for additional information by the local government unless clear violation of substantive and procedural requirements is demonstrated by the reviewing local government.
Nothing in this subsection removes a local government's requirements to comply with the remainder of this chapter.
This subsection does not apply to:
(a) Project permit applications required to be approved by hearing examiners or legislative bodies;
or (b) Project permit applications required by state or federal law.
Landmark designations, street vacations, or other approvals relating to the use of public areas or facilities, or other project permits, whether administrative or quasi-judicial, that the local government by p.ordinance or resolution has determined present special circumstances that warrant a review process or time periods for approval which are different from that provided in RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.
Show all 57 changed lines (17 more)
3 SB 5729 ordinance or resolution has determined present special circumstances that warrant a review process or time periods for approval which are different from that provided in RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.
Lot line or boundary adjustments and building and other construction permits, or similar administrative approvals, categorically exempt from environmental reviewp. under chapter 43.21C RCW, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits.
4 ESB 5729 review under chapter 43.21C RCW, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits.
or (ii) The expansion or remodeling of existing buildings, structures, or development is locatedoutside inthe a critical area or incritical casesarea wherebuffers; two or more duplexes will be built on the same lot;
or (iii) In cases where two or more duplexes will be built on the same lot;
(((5))) (6) For purposes of this section, "interior alterations" include construction activities that do not modify the existing site layout or its current use and involve no exterior work adding to the building footprint.
Sec.
5.
RCW 18.43.035 and 2020 c 47 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
45 SBESB 5729 (((5)))(1) (6)The Forboard purposesmay ofadopt thisand section,amend "interiorbylaws alterations"establishing includeits constructionorganization activitiesand thatmethod doof notoperation, modifyincluding thebut existingnot sitelimited layoutto ormeetings, itsmaintenance currentof usebooks and involverecords, nopublication exteriorof workreports, addingcode toof theethics, buildingand footprint.rosters, and adoption and use of a seal.
(2) Four members of the board shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of any business of the board.
(3) The board shall appoint its director, who must hold a valid Washington license as a professional engineer or professional land surveyor.
(4) The board may employ such persons as are necessary to carry out its duties under this chapter.
(5) It may adopt rules reasonably necessary to administer the provisions of this chapter and RCW 36.70B.070(5)(b).
The board shall submit to the governor periodic reports as may be required.
A roster, showing the names and places of business of all registered professional engineers and land surveyors may be published for distribution, upon request, to professional engineers and land surveyors registered under this chapter and to the public.
56 SBESB 5729
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Engrossed Bill pdf
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
LG - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (HSG 26).
-
Returned to second reading for amendment.
-
Rules suspended.
-
Placed on third reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for third reading.
-
HSG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. On motion, referred to Housing.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
HSG - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Housing.
Sponsors
- Phil Fortunato · Cosponsor
- Phil Fortunato · Cosponsor
- Perry Dozier · Cosponsor
- Perry Dozier · Cosponsor
- Chris Gildon · Cosponsor
- Chris Gildon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Chris Gildon Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Phil Fortunato Republican
- Phil Fortunato Republican
- Perry Dozier Republican
- Perry Dozier Republican
- Chris Gildon Republican
Not signed on (145)
145 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 145 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Nay |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Nay |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5729?
- SB 5729 is sponsored by Phil Fortunato (Republican), Perry Dozier (Republican), and Chris Gildon (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 5729?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 5729?
- Track SB 5729 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5729
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5729
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →