Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 5 D cosponsors

HB 2418 — Concerning permit review processes.

Last action — Effective date 6/11/2026.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Bob Ferguson (Democratic) on March 27, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 80% · moderate confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

530 added · 566 removed

Plain-language change summary

The legislative changes to Bill HB 2418 include the establishment of new requirements for how local governments manage project permit applications for residential housing in urban growth areas. Specifically, the bill mandates that applications must be evaluated based on the zoning laws in effect at the time the application is fully submitted. Additionally, it allows local governments to pause the review process until necessary fees are paid and notices are given, but this pause won’t count against the overall processing time of the permit. These adjustments are significant because they aim to streamline the permit process and provide clarity for developers, potentially accelerating housing construction in response to growing demands.

→
Previous
Latest
H-3184.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2418 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Duerr, Zahn, Parshley, Peterson, and Reed) READ FIRST TIME 01/27/26.
H-2836.1 HOUSE BILL 2418 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Representatives Duerr, Zahn, Parshley, Peterson, and Reed Read first time 01/13/26.
Referred to Committee on Local Government.
amending RCW 36.70B.020, 36.70B.070, 36.70B.080, and 36.70B.060;
amending RCW 36.70B.020, 36.70B.080, and 36.70B.060;
adding a new section to chapter 36.70B RCW;
1 SHB 2418 development ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and binding site plan ordinances together with any amendments thereto.
1 HB 2418 development ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and binding site plan ordinances together with any amendments thereto.
2 SHB 2418 Sec.
2 HB 2418 NEW SECTION.
Sec.
RCW 36.70B.070 and 2023 c 338 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:
A new section is added to chapter 36.70B RCW to read as follows:
(1)(a) Within 28 days after receiving a project permit application, a local government planning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 shall provide a written determination to the applicant.
(1) A project permit application for one or more residential housing units within an urban growth area designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110, must be considered under the zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect at the time a fully complete project permit application has been submitted to the local government and determined to be complete pursuant to RCW 36.70B.070.
(b) The written determination must state either:
(2)(a) For purposes of this section, local government development regulations may require the review of a permit to be paused until applicable fees are paid and required notices are posted or delivered.
(i) That the application is procedurally complete;
The period during which permit review is paused for this reason is not included when determining the length of time a permit has been in process under RCW 36.70B.080.
or (ii) That the application is procedurally incomplete and that the procedural submission requirements of the local government have not been met.
(b) A project permit application may not be deemed invalid or incomplete for the purpose of determining what zoning and land control ordinances it will be considered under pursuant to subsection (1) of this section on the basis that an applicable fee has not been paid or required notice has not been posted or delivered.
The determination shall outline what is necessary to make the application procedurally complete.
(3) For purposes of this section, "zoning or other land use control ordinances" excludes the following:
(c) The number of days shall be calculated by counting every calendar day.
(a) Building permit ordinances within the meaning of RCW 19.27.095, and subdivision or short subdivision ordinances within the meaning of RCW 58.17.033;
(d) To the extent known by the local government, the local government shall identify other agencies of local, state, or federal governments that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of the application.
(b) Floodplain management ordinances adopted pursuant to chapter 86.16 RCW;
(2) A project permit application is procedurally complete for purposes of this section when it meets the procedural submission requirements of the local government, as outlined on the project permit application.
(c) Water pollution control ordinances adopted pursuant to chapter 90.48 RCW;
A determination of procedural completeness is not a substantive review of the application and shall not be conditioned on the adequacy, accuracy, or sufficiency of the information submitted.
and (d) Any permit review fee authorized under RCW 82.02.020, impact fee imposed under RCW 82.02.050, or utility rate or charge, including connection charges, for water, sewer, reclaimed water, and drain services duly enacted by a water or sewer district pursuant to RCW 57.08.005(11) or by a city, town, or county providing such utilities.
Additional information or studies may be required or project modifications may be undertaken subsequent to the procedural review of the application by the local government.
(4) This section does not alter the authority of a local government under chapter 43.21C RCW if the project permit is not exempt from review under chapter 43.21C RCW, chapter 197-11 WAC, or under the development regulations of the local government adopted to implement chapter 43.21C RCW or chapter 197-11 WAC.
The determination of completeness shall not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur.
(5) Nothing in this section affects the consideration of a building permit application under RCW 19.27.095, a proposed division p.
However, if the procedural submission requirements, as outlined on the project permit application have been provided, the need for additional information or studies may not preclude a completeness determination.
3 HB 2418 of land under RCW 58.17.033, or a development agreement under RCW 36.70B.180, nor the determination of the applicable zoning or other land use control ordinances under those chapters.
(3) The determination of completeness may include or be combined with the following:
(6)(a) Unless otherwise established pursuant to an executed development agreement adopted under RCW 36.70B.180 that governs the project permit application, a jurisdiction must provide for vested rights to be maintained for a minimum of two years for project permit applications containing 50 or fewer residential units, and a minimum of three years for project permit applications containing more than 50 residential units.
(a) A preliminary determination of those development regulations that will be used for project mitigation;
(b) Submittal of a complete building permit application before the expiration of a project permit application extends the vesting period for the project permit for as long as the building permit remains active.
(b) A preliminary determination of consistency, as provided under RCW 36.70B.040;
(7) This section has no application or effect outside of urban growth areas designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110.
p.
3 SHB 2418 (c) Other information the local government chooses to include;
or (d) The notice of application pursuant to the requirements in RCW 36.70B.110.
(4)(a) An application shall be deemed procedurally complete on the 29th day after receiving a project permit application under this section if the local government does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is procedurally incomplete as provided in subsection (1)(b)(ii) of this section.
When the local government does not provide a written determination, they may still seek additional information or studies as provided for in subsection (2) of this section.
(b) Within 14 days after an applicant has submitted to a local government additional information identified by the local government as being necessary for a complete application, the local government shall notify the applicant whether the application is complete or what additional information is necessary.
(c) The notice of application shall be provided within 14 days after the determination of procedural completeness pursuant to RCW 36.70B.110.
p.
(d) The time periods for local government action to issue a final decision for each type of complete project permit application or project type subject to this chapter should not exceed the following p.
4 SHB 2418 (d) The time periods for local government action to issue a final decision for each type of complete project permit application or project type subject to this chapter should not exceed the following time periods unless modified by the local government pursuant to this section or RCW 36.70B.140:
4 HB 2418 time periods unless modified by the local government pursuant to this section or RCW 36.70B.140:
(i) Any period between the day that the county or city has notified the applicant, in writing, that additional information is required to further process the application, an applicable fee must be paid, or a required notice must be posted, and the day when p.
(i) Any period between the day that the county or city has notified the applicant, in writing, that additional information is required to further process the application, an applicable fee must be paid, or a required notice must be posted, and the day when responsive information is resubmitted by the applicant, the fee is paid, or the notice is posted;
5 SHB 2418 responsive information is resubmitted by the applicant, the fee is paid, or the notice is posted;
(ii) Any period after an applicant informs the local government, in writing, that they would like to temporarily suspend review of the p.
(ii) Any period after an applicant informs the local government, in writing, that they would like to temporarily suspend review of the project permit application until the time that the applicant notifies the local government, in writing, that they would like to resume the application.
5 HB 2418 project permit application until the time that the applicant notifies the local government, in writing, that they would like to resume the application.
p.
(k) A county's or city's adoption of a resolution or ordinance to implement this subsection shall not be subject to appeal under chapter 36.70A RCW unless the resolution or ordinance modifies the p.
6 SHB 2418 (k) A county's or city's adoption of a resolution or ordinance to implement this subsection shall not be subject to appeal under chapter 36.70A RCW unless the resolution or ordinance modifies the time periods provided in (d) of this subsection by providing for a review period of more than 170 days for any project permit.
6 HB 2418 time periods provided in (d) of this subsection by providing for a review period of more than 170 days for any project permit.
(2)(a) Any government entity other than a local government, including special purpose districts and public utilities, that imposes a fee on an applicant for review of a project permit application, or a portion thereof, related to a residential project must complete its review of the project permit application within the time periods established in subsection (1)(d) of this section, unless the applicant agrees in writing to waive the application of the time period for review.
(2) Any government entity other than a local government that imposes a fee on an applicant for review of a portion of a project permit application, including special purpose districts and public utilities, must complete its review of its portion of the project permit application within the time frames established in subsection (1)(d) of this section.
Such a waiver may occur at any time prior to the denial of the project permit application or the exhaustion of the time period for review.
The time that a government entity has taken to review a project permit application must be determined as provided for in subsection (1)(g) of this section, and is exclusive of the time that a local government or other entity has taken to conduct its review of its portion of the project permit application.
If an applicant has agreed to waive the application of the time period, then the provisions of this subsection (2) do not apply to the review of the project permit application.
A government entity that does not complete its review within the required time frame must refund or forgo 20 percent of the fee that it collected or would have collected for its review.
Show all 83 changed rows (43 more)
Previous
Latest
p.
(3)(a) Counties subject to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215 and the cities within those counties that have populations of at least 20,000 must, for each type of permit application, identify the total number of project permit applications for which decisions are issued p.
7 SHB 2418 (b) The time that a government entity has taken to review a project permit application must be determined as provided for in subsection (1)(g) of this section, and is exclusive of the time that a local government or other entity has taken to conduct its review of its portion of the project permit application.
7 HB 2418 according to the provisions of this chapter.
(c) A government entity that does not complete its review within the required time periods must refund or forgo 20 percent of the fee that it collected or would have collected for its review.
A government entity that does not collect a fee for its review of a portion of a project permit application is not required to provide any refund under this section.
(3)(a) Counties subject to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215 and the cities within those counties that have populations of at least 20,000 must, for each type of permit application, identify the total number of project permit applications for which decisions are issued according to the provisions of this chapter.
(iv) The average number of days from a submittal to a decision being issued for the project permit types listed in ((subsection (2)(b)(ii) of this section [(b)(ii) of this subsection])) (b)(ii) of p.
(iv) The average number of days from a submittal to a decision being issued for the project permit types listed in ((subsection (2)(b)(ii) of this section [(b)(ii) of this subsection])) (b)(ii) of this subsection.
8 SHB 2418 this subsection.
(vi) The total number of days that were excluded from the time period calculation under subsection (1)(g)(i) through (iii) of this section for each project permit application of a type listed in ((subsection (2)(b)(ii) of this section [(b)(ii) of this subsection])) (b)(ii) of this subsection.
(vi) The total number of days that were excluded from the time period calculation under subsection (1)(g)(i) through (iii) of this p.
8 HB 2418 section for each project permit application of a type listed in ((subsection (2)(b)(ii) of this section [(b)(ii) of this subsection])) (b)(ii) of this subsection.
If an applicant has agreed to extend the deadline for issuing a decision on a specific project permit p.
9 SHB 2418 application, then the provisions of subsection (1) of this section do not apply to the review of the project permit application.
Such an extension may occur at any time prior to the denial of the project permit application or the exhaustion of the time period for review.
This official has the authority to make all final administrative decisions on approval of project permit applications consistent with the procedural requirements of this chapter.
This official has the authority to make p.
9 HB 2418 all final administrative decisions on approval of project permit applications consistent with the procedural requirements of this chapter.
The review process shall provide for no more than one p.
The review process shall provide for no more than one consolidated open record hearing and one closed record appeal.
10 SHB 2418 consolidated open record hearing and one closed record appeal.
(((6))) (7) Except for the appeal of a determination of significance as provided in RCW 43.21C.075, if a local government elects to provide an appeal of its threshold determinations or project permit decisions, the local government shall provide for no more than one consolidated open record hearing on such appeal.
p.
10 HB 2418 (((6))) (7) Except for the appeal of a determination of significance as provided in RCW 43.21C.075, if a local government elects to provide an appeal of its threshold determinations or project permit decisions, the local government shall provide for no more than one consolidated open record hearing on such appeal.
p.
Sec.
11 SHB 2418 Sec.
(d) Maintaining and budgeting for on-call permitting assistance for when permit volumes or staffing levels change rapidly;
p.
11 HB 2418 (d) Maintaining and budgeting for on-call permitting assistance for when permit volumes or staffing levels change rapidly;
The meeting must be scheduled within 14 days of a second request for corrections during permit p.
The meeting must be scheduled within 14 days of a second request for corrections during permit review.
12 SHB 2418 review.
(3) Nothing in this chapter is intended or shall be construed to prevent a local government from requiring a preapplication conference or a public meeting by rule, ordinance, or resolution, where otherwise required by applicable state law.
(3) Nothing in this chapter is intended or shall be construed to prevent a local government from requiring a preapplication conference p.
12 HB 2418 or a public meeting by rule, ordinance, or resolution, where otherwise required by applicable state law.
(c) "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is less than 80 percent of the median family income, adjusted for household size, p.
(c) "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is less than 80 percent of the median family income, adjusted for household size, for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development, or less than 80 percent of the city's median income if the project is located in the city, the city has median income of more than 20 percent above the county median income, and the city has adopted an alternative local median income.
13 SHB 2418 for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development, or less than 80 percent of the city's median income if the project is located in the city, the city has median income of more than 20 percent above the county median income, and the city has adopted an alternative local median income.
(1) Whenever a public utility district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application related to a residential project, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
(1) Whenever a public utility district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for p.
13 HB 2418 a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
A district that does not collect a fee for its review of a portion of a project permit application is not required to provide any refund under this section.
p.
(1) Whenever the department imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application, the department must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
14 SHB 2418 (1) Whenever the department imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application related to a residential project, the department must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
If the department does not collect a fee for its review of a portion of a project permit application, it is not required to provide any refund under this section.
(1) Whenever a district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application related to a residential project, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
(1) Whenever a district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
The time that a project permit application has been under review must be calculated from the date that the district receives the information necessary for it to begin its review until the district has issued its final decision, and excluded any time period that would be excluded from the calculation of the time that a local government has been reviewing an application under RCW 36.70B.080(1)(g).
The time that a project permit application has been under review must be calculated p.
14 HB 2418 from the date that the district receives the information necessary for it to begin its review until the district has issued its final decision, and excluded any time period that would be excluded from the calculation of the time that a local government has been reviewing an application under RCW 36.70B.080(1)(g).
A district that does not collect a fee for its review of a portion of a project permit application is not required to provide any refund under this section.
(3) For the purposes of this section, "project permit" has the same meaning as in RCW 36.70B.020.
p.
15 SHB 2418 (3) For the purposes of this section, "project permit" has the same meaning as in RCW 36.70B.020.
(1) Whenever a district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application related to a residential project, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
(1) Whenever a district imposes a fee on an applicant for the review of a project permit application, the district must complete its review within the time frames provided for a local government to issue a final decision in RCW 36.70B.080(1)(d).
A district that does not collect a fee for its review of a portion of a project permit application is not required to provide any refund under this section.
16 SHB 2418
15 HB 2418
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/11/2026.

  2. Chapter 235, 2026 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. President signed.

  6. Speaker signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 96; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  8. House concurred in Senate amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.

  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  13. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  14. Minority; without recommendation.

  15. LGV - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  16. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 1:30 PM.

  17. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 1:30 PM.

  18. First reading, referred to Local Government.

  19. Third reading, passed; yeas, 93; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 5.

  20. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  21. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  22. 2nd substitute bill substituted (APP 26).

  23. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  24. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  25. APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  26. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 9:00 AM.

  27. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  28. Referred to Appropriations.

  29. LG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  30. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.

  31. Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:30 AM.

  32. First reading, referred to Local Government.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage as Amended by the Senate (#32)

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 36002
Democrat 60000
Total 96002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Adam Bernbaum Democrat Yea
Adison Richards Democrat Yea
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Brianna Thomas Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Edwin Obras Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Janice Zahn Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Lisa Parshley Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Natasha Hill Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Osman Salahuddin Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shaun Scott Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Zach Hall Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Andrew Engell Republican Yea
April Connors Republican Yea
Brian Burnett Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
David Stuebe Republican Yea
Deb Manjarrez Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Not Voting
Gloria Mendoza Republican Yea
Hunter Abell Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Not Voting
John Ley Republican Yea
Joshua Penner Republican Yea
Kevin Waters Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Marshall Republican Yea
Michael Keaton Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Sam Low Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Stephanie Barnard Republican Yea
Stephanie McClintock Republican Yea
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea
Travis Couture Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading & Final Passage as Amended by the Senate (#31)

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30000
Republican 19000
Total 49000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading & Final Passage (#10)

Passed 93 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 35003
Democrat 58002
Total 93005
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Adam Bernbaum Democrat Yea
Adison Richards Democrat Yea
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Not Voting
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Brianna Thomas Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Edwin Obras Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Janice Zahn Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Lisa Parshley Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Natasha Hill Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Osman Salahuddin Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shaun Scott Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Not Voting
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Zach Hall Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Andrew Engell Republican Yea
April Connors Republican Yea
Brian Burnett Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Not Voting
Chris Corry Republican Not Voting
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
David Stuebe Republican Yea
Deb Manjarrez Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Gloria Mendoza Republican Yea
Hunter Abell Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
John Ley Republican Yea
Joshua Penner Republican Yea
Kevin Waters Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Marshall Republican Yea
Michael Keaton Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Sam Low Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Stephanie Barnard Republican Yea
Stephanie McClintock Republican Yea
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Not Voting
Travis Couture Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

environment transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2418?
HB 2418 is sponsored by Julia Reed (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), Janice Zahn (Democrat), and Davina Duerr (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 2418?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2418?
Track HB 2418 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2418

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2418

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →