SB 5202 — Ensuring the efficacy of judicial orders as harm reduction tools that increase the safety of survivors of abuse and support law enforcement in their efforts to enforce the law.
Last action — Effective date 7/27/2025*.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Bob Ferguson (Democratic) on April 22, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
796 added · 809 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of bill SB 5202 includes specific requirements for how protection order petitions can be submitted. Now, county clerks will need to allow petitions to be filed in person, online, or by mail, especially for those who are incarcerated or unable to file in person. This change is crucial because it increases accessibility for individuals seeking protection, ensuring they can obtain necessary legal support regardless of their circumstances. Additionally, the rights of judicial officers to access these documents without charge remain intact, promoting efficiency in the legal process.
ENGROSSEDS-0445.2 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5202 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Salomon, Cortes, Dhingra, and Hasegawa)Hasegawa READPrefiled FIRST01/09/25. TIME 01/24/25.
Read first time 01/13/25.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
and reenacting and amending RCW 7.105.310;7.105.310.
adding a new section to chapter 7.105 RCW;
and providing an effective date.
Judicial officers may not p.be charged for access to such documents.
1The ESSBelectronic 5202submission bep. charged for access to such documents.
The1 electronicSB submission5202 system must allow for petitions for protection orders and supportive documents to be submitted at any time of the day.
Notification from the court or clerk may be provided by text messaging or email, and should provide reminders of court appearances and alert the petitioner when the following occur:
((and))and (vi) the respondent has filed a motion for the release of surrendered firearms;firearms.
and (vii) 90 days before the expiration of the order.
or otherwise fulfill the identification, service, enforcement, and notification requirements of chapter 9.41,9.41 36.28A, or 2.56 RCW or this chapter.
If the confidential information form is wrongfully disclosed, the court shall seal and issue a protective order on the court's own initiative, or upon notice of the disclosure,disclosure. and if necessary, order sealing under applicable law.
The respondent should be provided a blank confidential party information form at the time of service, and when the respondent first appears, the respondent must confirm with the court the respondent's identifying and current contact p.
2 ESSBSB 5202 information form at the time of service, and when the respondent first appears, the respondent must confirm with the court the respondent's identifying and current contact information, including electronic means of contact, and file this with the court.
(9)(a) No fees for service of process may be charged by a court or any public agency to petitioners seeking relief under this p.
3 ESSBSB 5202 (9)(a) No fees for service of process may be charged by a court or any public agency to petitioners seeking relief under this chapter.
If a guardian ad litem is appointed by the court for either or both parties, neither p.the petitioner nor the respondent shall be required by the court to pay any costs associated with the appointment.
4p. ESSB 5202 the petitioner nor the respondent shall be required by the court to pay any costs associated with the appointment.
4 SB 5202 (12) If a petitioner has requested an ex parte temporary protection order, because these are often emergent situations, the court shall prioritize review, either entering an order without a hearing or scheduling and holding an ex parte hearing in person, by telephone, by video, or by other electronic means on the day the petition is filed if possible.
23.107(b)23.107 (b) applies.
Where there is a finding that the federal Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does apply, the order must also contain a finding that all notice, evidentiary requirements, and placement preferences under the federal Indian child welfare act and chapter 13.38 RCW have been satisfied, or a finding that removal or placement of the child is necessary to p.prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
5 ESSB 5202 prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
Where there is a finding that the federalp. Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does not apply, the order must also contain a finding as to why there is no reason to know the child may be an Indian child.
5 SB 5202 federal Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does not apply, the order must also contain a finding as to why there is no reason to know the child may be an Indian child.
(f) If the parties have children in common, make residential provisions with regard to their minor children on the same basis as p.is provided in chapter 26.09 RCW.
6However, ESSBparenting 5202plans isas providedspecified in chapter 26.09 RCW.RCW must not be required under this p.
However,6 parentingSB plans5202 as specified in chapter 26.09 RCW must not be required under this chapter.
The court shall send notice of the restriction on attending the same school as the petitioner to the public or private p.
7 ESSBSB 5202 attending the same school as the petitioner to the public or private school the respondent will attend and to the school the petitioner attends;
The court may order that a petitioner be granted the exclusive custody or control of any pet owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the petitioner, respondent, or minor child p.
8 ESSBSB 5202 leased, kept, or held by the petitioner, respondent, or minor child residing with either the petitioner or respondent, and may prohibit the respondent from interfering with the petitioner's efforts to obtain the pet.
and cease any p.and all disclosure of those intimate images.
9The ESSBcourt 5202may andalso allp. disclosure of those intimate images.
The9 courtSB may5202 also inform the respondent that it would be appropriate to ask third parties in possession or control of the intimate images of this protection order to take down and delete the intimate images so that the order may not inadvertently be violated;
The order shall also state whether the court issued the protection order following personal service, service by electronic means, service by mail, or service by publication, and p.
10 ESSBSB 5202 electronic means, service by mail, or service by publication, and whether the court has approved service by mail or publication of an order issued under this section.
A minor who is or was previously protected byminor a protection order who has reached the age of 18 may petition for renewal of the order as thean petitioneradult pursuant to subsection (10) of this section.
(c) For a stalking protection order, that the respondent proves that the respondent will not resume acts of stalking against the p.
Show all 83 changed lines (43 more)
11 ESSBSB 5202 (c) For a stalking protection order, that the respondent proves that the respondent will not resume acts of stalking against the petitioner or the petitioner's family or household members when the order expires;
(6) The court shall not deny a motion to renew a protection order for any of the following reasons:
12 ESSBSB 5202 (6)(a) The courtrespondent shallhas not denyviolated athe motion to renew a protection order forpreviously anyissued ofby the followingcourt; reasons:
(a) The respondent has not violated the protection order previously issued by the court;
(b) IfA a minor who was previously protected byminor awho protectionhas orderreached reaches the age of 18 after the order has expired, the minor has up to one year from the date of expiration of the order to petition for renewal of the order as thean petitioner.adult.
(c) The clerk shall issue a new cause number for renewals granted under this subsectionsubsection. and shall include the previously ordered protection order and petition for renewal in the new case file.
p.(11) The court may award court costs, service fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees to the petitioner as provided in RCW 7.105.310.
13(((11))) ESSB(12) 5202If (11)the The court maydeclines awardto courtrenew costs,the serviceprotection fees,order, andthe reasonablecourt attorneys'shall feesstate, toin thewriting petitionerin asthe providedorder, inthe RCWparticular 7.105.310.p.
(((11)))13 (12)SB If5202 the court declines to renew the protection order, the court shall state, in writing in the order, the particular reasons for the court's denial.
If the court finds that the respondent established adequate cause, the court shall set a date for hearing the respondent's motion, which p.must be at least 14 days from the date the court finds adequate cause.
14(3) ESSBUpon 5202the mustmotion beof ata leastrespondent, 14the dayscourt frommay not modify or terminate an existing protection order unless the daterespondent proves by a preponderance of the courtevidence findsthat adequatethere cause.has been a substantial p.
(3)14 UponSB the5202 motion of a respondent, the court may not modify or terminate an existing protection order unless the respondent proves by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a substantial change in circumstances such that the respondent will not resume, engage in, or attempt to engage in, the following acts against the petitioner or those persons protected by the protection order if the order is terminated or modified:
p.(f) Whether the respondent has a continuing involvement with drug or alcohol abuse, if such abuse was a factor in the protection order;
15 ESSB 5202 (f) Whether the respondent has a continuing involvement with drug or alcohol abuse, if such abuse was a factor in the protection order;
or (h)p. Other factors relating to a substantial change in circumstances.
15 SB 5202 (h) Other factors relating to a substantial change in circumstances.
p.Sec.
16 ESSB 5202 Sec.
(1)(a)p. A person, whether an adult or juvenile, is guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree((, if)):
(i)16 IfSB the5202 person(1)(a) owns,A accesses,person, haswhether inan theadult person's custody, control, or possession,juvenile, oris receivesguilty anyof firearmthe aftercrime havingof previouslyunlawful beenpossession convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanitya firearm in thisthe statefirst ordegree((, elsewhereif)): of any serious offense ;
(i) If the person owns, accesses, has in the person's custody, control, or possession, or receives any firearm after having previously been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity in this state or elsewhere of any serious offense;
(D) Any of the following misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor crimes not included under (a)(i) (B) or (C) of this subsection, committed on p.or after July 23, 2023:
17 ESSB 5202 or after July 23, 2023:
cyber harassment, excluding cyber harassment committed solelyp. pursuant to the element set forth in RCW 9A.90.120(1)(a)(i);
17 SB 5202 solely pursuant to the element set forth in RCW 9A.90.120(1)(a)(i);
and (C)(I) Includes a finding that the person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of the protected person or child or others identified in the order, or by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against p.
18 ESSBSB 5202 the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the protected person or child or other persons that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury;
(4) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2) of this section, a person convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity of an offense prohibiting the possession of a firearm under this section other than murder, manslaughter, robbery, rape, indecent liberties, arson, assault, kidnapping, extortion, burglary, or violations with respect to controlled substances under RCW 69.50.401 and 69.50.410, who received a probationary sentence under RCW 9.95.200, and who received a dismissal of the charge under RCW 9.95.240, shall not be p.
19 ESSBSB 5202 received a dismissal of the charge under RCW 9.95.240, shall not be precluded from possession of a firearm as a result of the conviction or finding of not guilty by reason of insanity.
(8) Each firearm unlawfully possessed under this section shall be a separate offense.
20 ESSBSB 5202 (8)(9) EachA firearmperson unlawfullymay possessedpetition underto thisrestore sectionthe shallright beto possess a separatefirearm offense.as provided in RCW 9.41.041.
(9) A person may petition to restore the right to possess a firearm as provided in RCW 9.41.041.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
6.
A new section is added to chapter 7.105 RCW to read as follows:
Any full protection order or temporary protection order issued under this chapter after December 31, 2025, including any modifications thereof, must be typewritten in its entirety, as available in the local jurisdiction.
This section does not apply to the signature of the issuing judge or court commissioner.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
Section 1 of this act takes effect March 31, 2026.
21 ESSBSB 5202
Show all 83 changed rows (43 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Passed Legislature Current pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 7/27/2025*.
-
Chapter 122, 2025 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 59; nays, 39; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
CRJ - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 36; nays, 13; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 25).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Jesse Salomon · Primary
- Adrian Cortes · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 52 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jesse Salomon Democrat
Co-sponsors (3)
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Adrian Cortes Democrat
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 59 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Bernbaum | Democrat | Yea |
| Adison Richards | Democrat | Yea |
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Thomas | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Edwin Obras | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Zahn | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Nay |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Parshley | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Natasha Hill | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Osman Salahuddin | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shaun Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Engell | Republican | Nay |
| April Connors | Republican | Nay |
| Brian Burnett | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| David Stuebe | Republican | Nay |
| Deb Manjarrez | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Gloria Mendoza | Republican | Nay |
| Hunter Abell | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| John Ley | Republican | Nay |
| Joshua Penner | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Marshall | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Keaton | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Sam Low | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Nay |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5202?
- SB 5202 is sponsored by Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Jesse Salomon (Democrat), and Adrian Cortes (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5202?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5202?
- Track SB 5202 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5202
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5202
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →