HB 2178 — Concerning court rules and procedures.
Last action — Effective date 6/11/2026.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 19, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Bob Ferguson (Democratic) on March 23, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
195 added · 20 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HB 2178 primarily focus on enhancing access to protection orders in Washington State courts. The amendments ensure that, by January 1, 2028, all courts will allow individuals to submit petitions for protection orders in various ways: in person, remotely online, or by mail, particularly benefiting those who are incarcerated or unable to file in person. This is important because it makes the legal process more accessible for vulnerable individuals who need protection. Additionally, a provision requiring the state treasurer to allocate funds to support county clerks' budgets for processing these petitions has been removed, which may affect funding stability for these essential services.
H-2959.1Z-0483.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2178 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Civil Rights & Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Thai, Abell, Ryu, Simmons, Reed, Zahn, Reeves, and Fosse;
by request of Administrative Office of the Courts)Courts READPrefiled FIRST12/19/25. TIME 01/20/26.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary.
amending RCW 9A.48.100, 7.80.070, 7.80.050, 7.80.120, and 7.80.120;7.105.105;
adding a new section to chapter 43.08 RCW;
1 SHBHB 2178 to the property would, when considered separately, constitute mischief in the third degree because of value, then the value of the damages may be aggregated in one count.
2 SHBHB 2178 notice is personally served or, if the notice is served by mail, within 33 days of the date the notice is mailed;
3 SHBHB 2178 (a) The maximum penalty and the default amount for a class 1 civil infraction shall be $250, not including statutory assessments, except for an infraction of state law involving (i) potentially dangerous litter as specified in RCW 70A.200.060(((4))) (5), in which case the maximum penalty and default amount is $500;
4 SHBHB 2178 to take civil legal enforcement action, the court shall enter into a payment plan with the individual.
NEW SECTION.
ARCW new7.105.105 sectionand is2025 addedc to122 chapters 43.081 RCWare each amended to read as follows:
ByThe Octoberfollowing 1stapply of each year, the state treasurer shall distribute such funds to countiesall petitions for countyprotection clerkorders collectionunder budgets as are appropriated by the legislature for this purpose,chapter. using the funding formula recommended by the Washington association of county officials.
(1)(a) County clerks on behalf of all superior courts and, by January 1, ((2026)) 2028, all courts of limited jurisdiction, must permit petitions for protection orders and all other filings in connection with the petition to be submitted as preferred by the petitioner either:
(i) In person;
(ii) remotely through an electronic submission process;
or (iii) by mail for persons who are incarcerated or who are otherwise unable to file in person or remotely through an electronic system.
The court or clerk must make available electronically to judicial officers any protection orders filed within the state.
Judicial officers may not be charged for access to such documents.
The electronic submission system must allow for petitions for protection orders and supportive documents to be submitted at any time of the day.
When a petition and supporting documents for a protection order are submitted to the clerk after business hours, they must be processed as soon as possible on the next judicial day.
Petitioners and respondents should not incur additional charges for electronic submission for petitions and documents filed pursuant to this section.
(b) All superior courts' systems and, by January 1, ((2026)) 2028, all limited jurisdiction courts' systems, should allow for the petitioner to electronically track the progress of the petition for a protection order.
Notification from the court or clerk may be provided by text messaging or email, and should provide reminders of court appearances and alert the petitioner when the following occur:
p.
5 HB 2178 (i) The petition has been processed and is under review by a judicial officer;
(ii) the order has been signed;
(iii) the order has been transmitted to law enforcement for entry into the Washington crime information center system;
(iv) proof of service upon the respondent has been filed with the court or clerk;
(v) a receipt for the surrender of firearms has been filed with the court or clerk;
(vi) the respondent has filed a motion for the release of surrendered firearms;
and (vii) 90 days before the expiration of the order.
Respondents, once served, should be able to sign up for similar electronic notification.
Petitioners and respondents should not be charged for electronic notification.
(2) The petition must be accompanied by a confidential document to be used by courts, law enforcement, and prosecutors' offices to fully identify the parties;
serve the respondent;
enable notification of victims or protected persons;
or otherwise fulfill the identification, service, enforcement, and notification requirements of chapter 9.41, 36.28A, or 2.56 RCW or this chapter.
This record will be exempt from public disclosure at all times, and restricted access to this form is governed by general rule 22 provisions governing access to the confidential information form.
If the confidential information form is wrongfully disclosed, the court shall issue a protective order on the court's own initiative, or upon notice of the disclosure, and if necessary, order sealing under applicable law.
Show all 87 changed lines (47 more)
The petitioner is required to fill out the confidential party information form to the petitioner's fullest ability.
The respondent should be provided a blank confidential party information form at the time of service, and when the respondent first appears, the respondent must confirm with the court the respondent's identifying and current contact information, including electronic means of contact, and file this with the court.
(3) A petition must be accompanied by a declaration signed under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought.
Parties, attorneys, and witnesses may electronically sign sworn statements in all filings.
(4) The petitioner and the respondent must disclose the existence of any other litigation or of any other restraining, protection, or no-contact orders between the parties, to the extent that such information is known by the petitioner and the respondent.
To the extent possible, the court shall take judicial notice of any existing restraining, protection, or no-contact orders between the parties p.
6 HB 2178 before entering a protection order.
The court shall not include provisions in a protection order that would allow the respondent to engage in conduct that is prohibited by another restraining, protection, or no-contact order between the parties that was entered in a different proceeding.
The obligation to disclose the existence of any other litigation includes, but is not limited to, the existence of any other litigation concerning the custody or residential placement of a child of the parties as set forth in RCW 26.27.281.
The court administrator shall verify for the court the terms of any existing protection order governing the parties.
(5) The petition may be made regardless of whether or not there is a pending lawsuit, complaint, petition, or other action between the parties, except in cases where the court has realigned the parties in accordance with RCW 7.105.210.
(6) Relief under this chapter must not be denied or delayed on the grounds that the relief is available in another action.
The court shall not defer acting on a petition for a protection order nor grant a petitioner less than the full relief that the petitioner is otherwise entitled to under this chapter because there is, or could be, another proceeding involving the parties including, but not limited to, any potential or pending family law matter or criminal matter.
(7) A person's right to petition for relief under this chapter is not affected by the person leaving his or her residence or household.
(8) A petitioner is not required to post a bond to obtain relief in any proceeding for a protection order.
(9)(a) No fees for service of process may be charged by a court or any public agency to petitioners seeking relief under this chapter.
Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, courts may not charge petitioners any fees or surcharges the payment of which is a condition precedent to the petitioner's ability to secure access to relief under this chapter.
Petitioners shall be provided the necessary number of certified copies, forms, and instructional brochures free of charge, including a copy of the service packet that consists of all documents that are being served on the respondent.
A respondent who is served electronically with a protection order shall be provided a certified copy of the order free of charge upon request.
(b) A filing fee may be charged for a petition for an antiharassment protection order except as follows:
p.
7 HB 2178 (i) No filing fee may be charged to a petitioner seeking an antiharassment protection order against a person who has engaged in acts of stalking as defined in RCW 9A.46.110, a hate crime under RCW 9A.36.080(1)(c), or a single act of violence or threat of violence under RCW 7.105.010(37)(b), or from a person who has engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct or penetration or conduct that would constitute a sex offense as defined in RCW 9A.44.128, or from a person who is a family or household member or intimate partner who has engaged in conduct that would constitute domestic violence;
and (ii) The court shall waive the filing fee if the court determines the petitioner is not able to pay the costs of filing.
(10) If the petition states that disclosure of the petitioner's address or other identifying location information would risk harm to the petitioner or any member of the petitioner's family or household, that address may be omitted from all documents filed with the court.
If the petitioner has not disclosed an address under this subsection, the petitioner shall designate an alternative address or email address at which the respondent may serve the petitioner.
(11) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, or as provided through alternative sources including, but not limited to, grants, local funding, or pro bono means, if the court deems it necessary, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem for a petitioner or a respondent who is under 18 years of age and who is not represented by counsel.
If a guardian ad litem is appointed by the court for either or both parties, neither the petitioner nor the respondent shall be required by the court to pay any costs associated with the appointment.
(12) If a petitioner has requested an ex parte temporary protection order, because these are often emergent situations, the court shall prioritize review, either entering an order without a hearing or scheduling and holding an ex parte hearing in person, by telephone, by video, or by other electronic means on the day the petition is filed if possible.
Otherwise, it must be heard no later than the following judicial day.
The clerk shall ensure that the request for an ex parte temporary protection order is presented timely to a judicial officer, and signed orders will be returned promptly to the clerk for entry and to the petitioner as specified in this section.
(13) Courts shall not require a petitioner to file duplicative forms.
p.
8 HB 2178 (14) The Indian child welfare act applies in the following manner.
(a) In a proceeding under this chapter where the petitioner seeks to protect a minor and the petitioner is not the minor's parent as defined by RCW 13.38.040, the petition must contain a statement alleging whether the minor is or may be an Indian child as defined in RCW 13.38.040.
If the minor is an Indian child, chapter 13.38 RCW and the federal Indian child welfare act, 25 U.S.C.
Sec.
1901 et seq., shall apply.
A party should allege in the petition if these laws have been satisfied in a prior proceeding and identify the proceeding.
(b) Every order entered in any proceeding under this chapter where the petitioner is not a parent of the minor or minors protected by the order must contain a finding that the federal Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does or does not apply, or if there is insufficient information to make a determination, the court must make a finding that a determination must be made before a full protection order may be entered.
If there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, but the court does not have sufficient evidence to determine that the child is or is not an Indian child, 25 C.F.R.
Sec.
23.107 (b) applies.
Where there is a finding that the federal Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does apply, the order must also contain a finding that all notice, evidentiary requirements, and placement preferences under the federal Indian child welfare act and chapter 13.38 RCW have been satisfied, or a finding that removal or placement of the child is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
Sec.
1922 and RCW 13.38.140.
Where there is a finding that the federal Indian child welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW does not apply, the order must also contain a finding as to why there is no reason to know the child may be an Indian child.
59 SHBHB 2178
Show all 87 changed rows (47 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Passed Legislature Current pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 6/11/2026.
-
Chapter 151, 2026 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 39; nays, 9; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
LAW - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 89; nays, 8; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (CRJ 26).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
CRJ - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Mary Fosse · Cosponsor
- Kristine Reeves · Cosponsor
- Janice Zahn · Cosponsor
- Julia Reed · Cosponsor
- Tarra Simmons · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
- Hunter Abell · Cosponsor
- My-Linh Thai · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 17 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- My-Linh Thai Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Mary Fosse Democrat
- Kristine Reeves Democrat
- Janice Zahn Democrat
- Julia Reed Democrat
- Tarra Simmons Democrat
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
- Hunter Abell Republican
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 18% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 30 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 59 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 89 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 8% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Bernbaum | Democrat | Yea |
| Adison Richards | Democrat | Yea |
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Thomas | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Edwin Obras | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Zahn | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Parshley | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Natasha Hill | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Osman Salahuddin | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shaun Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Zach Hall | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Engell | Republican | Yea |
| April Connors | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Burnett | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| David Stuebe | Republican | Yea |
| Deb Manjarrez | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Gloria Mendoza | Republican | Yea |
| Hunter Abell | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| John Ley | Republican | Yea |
| Joshua Penner | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Marshall | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Keaton | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Sam Low | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Yea |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2178?
- HB 2178 is sponsored by Mary Fosse (Democrat), Kristine Reeves (Democrat), Janice Zahn (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Hunter Abell (Republican), and My-Linh Thai (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2178?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 19, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2178?
- Track HB 2178 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2178
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2178
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →