Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 15 D · 4 R cosponsors

HB 1592 — Concerning public defense services.

Last action — Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 24, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 19 sponsors

    1 primary, 18 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 4 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

258 added · 297 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 1592 updates how public defense funding will be shared among the state, counties, and cities starting in fiscal year 2026. Now, the state will cover 50% of the costs based on a five-year historical average of expenses reported by eligible counties. Additionally, if public defense costs exceed this average, the state will take on those additional expenses. This change aims to alleviate the financial burden on local governments and ensure a more equitable funding system for public defense services.

→
Previous
Latest
H-1527.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1592 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Civil Rights & Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Peterson, Low, Goodman, Nance, Parshley, Taylor, Ortiz-Self, Rude, Duerr, Richards, Steele, Barnard, Farivar, Simmons, Zahn, Timmons, Doglio, Pollet, and Reed) READ FIRST TIME 02/21/25.
H-0435.1 HOUSE BILL 1592 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Representatives Peterson, Low, Goodman, Nance, Parshley, Taylor, Ortiz-Self, Rude, Duerr, Richards, Steele, Barnard, Farivar, Simmons, Zahn, Timmons, Doglio, Pollet, and Reed Read first time 01/24/25.
Referred to Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary.
amending RCW 10.101.050, 10.101.060, 10.101.070, and 10.101.080;
amending RCW 10.101.050, 10.101.060, and 10.101.070;
(b) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, the state shall be responsible for 50 percent of the cost of public defense services based on an average of the actual expenditures for public defense services paid for by eligible cities for the previous five years looking back from p.
(b) In fiscal year 2026 and thereafter, the state shall be responsible for all public defense services costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section.
1 SHB 1592 fiscal year 2024.
The Washington state office of public defense shall disburse appropriated funds to eligible counties ((and cities)) for the p.
Beginning in fiscal year 2026, eligible cities shall not be responsible for public defense services costs that exceed this five-year average.
1 HB 1592 ((purpose of improving the quality of public defense services)) costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section consistent with RCW 10.101.060(2) (a) through (d).
(c) In fiscal year 2026 and thereafter, the state shall be responsible for all public defense services costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section.
(c) Any county funds supplanted by the funding distributions described in this section that were previously spent on public defense services may only be used for the following activities:
The Washington state office of public defense shall disburse appropriated funds to eligible counties ((and cities)) for the ((purpose of improving the quality of public defense services)) costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section consistent with RCW 10.101.060(2) (a) through (d) and to eligible cities for the costs that exceed the five-year average set forth in this section consistent with RCW 10.101.080.
(d) Any county funds supplanted by the funding distributions described in this section that were previously spent on public defense services may only be used for the following activities:
((Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the grant program set forth in RCW 10.101.080.)) (3) In order to receive funds, each ((applying)) county ((or city)) must ((require that attorneys providing public defense services attend training approved by the office of public defense at p.
((Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the grant program set forth in RCW 10.101.080.)) (3) In order to receive funds, each ((applying)) county ((or city)) must ((require that attorneys providing public defense services attend training approved by the office of public defense at least once per calendar year.
2 SHB 1592 least once per calendar year.
The county shall collect data of assigned and resolved cases and annually report to the office of public defense and the Washington state bar association the (i) number of assigned and resolved cases of each case type consistent with appendix B of the Washington state bar association indigent defense standards, and (ii) average number of billable attorney hours spent on resolved cases of each type.
The county shall collect data of p.
2 HB 1592 assigned and resolved cases and annually report to the office of public defense and the Washington state bar association the (i) number of assigned and resolved cases of each case type consistent with appendix B of the Washington state bar association indigent defense standards, and (ii) average number of billable attorney hours spent on resolved cases of each type.
(4) Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the distributions set forth in RCW 10.101.080.
(4) Cities may apply for moneys pursuant to the grant program set forth in RCW 10.101.080.
p.
Sec.
3 SHB 1592 Sec.
(2) Any county with a population density of less than 50 persons per square mile may request that the office of public defense assume responsibility for providing all or a designated portion of the public defense services for defendants appearing in a court under the county's jurisdiction.
(2) Any county with a population density of less than 50 persons per square mile may request that the office of public defense assume p.
3 HB 1592 responsibility for providing all or a designated portion of the public defense services for defendants appearing in a court under the county's jurisdiction.
(3) Each fiscal year for which it receives state funds under this chapter, a county or city must annually document to the office of public defense that it is meeting the standards for provision of indigent defense services as endorsed by the Washington state bar association or that the funds received under this chapter have been used to make appreciable demonstrable improvements in the delivery of public defense services((, including the following:
(3) Each fiscal year for which it receives state funds under this chapter, a county or city must annually document to the office of public defense that it is meeting the standards for provision of indigent defense services as endorsed by the Washington state bar association or that the funds received under this chapter have been used to make appreciable demonstrable improvements in the delivery of public defense services ((, including the following:
p.
(i) Adoption by ordinance of a legal representation plan that addresses the factors in RCW 10.101.030.
4 SHB 1592 (i) Adoption by ordinance of a legal representation plan that addresses the factors in RCW 10.101.030.
(iii) Requiring attorneys who handle the most serious cases to meet specified qualifications as set forth in the Washington state bar association endorsed standards for public defense services or participate in at least one case consultation per case with office of public defense resource attorneys who are so qualified.
(iii) Requiring attorneys who handle the most serious cases to meet specified qualifications as set forth in the Washington state bar association endorsed standards for public defense services or participate in at least one case consultation per case with office of p.
4 HB 1592 public defense resource attorneys who are so qualified.
If an applying p.
If an applying county or city disagrees with the determination of the office of public defense as to the county's or city's eligibility, the county or city may file an appeal with the advisory committee of the office of public defense within thirty days of the eligibility determination.
5 SHB 1592 county or city disagrees with the determination of the office of public defense as to the county's or city's eligibility, the county or city may file an appeal with the advisory committee of the office of public defense within thirty days of the eligibility determination.
Sec.
p.
5 HB 1592 Sec.
((Ninety percent of the funding appropriated)) Beginning in fiscal year 2026 and in each year thereafter, the state shall appropriate to the office of public defense funds necessary to comply with RCW 10.101.050(1)(a).
((Ninety percent of the funding appropriated)) Beginning in fiscal year 2026 and in each year thereafter, the state shall appropriate to the office of public defense funds necessary to comply with RCW 10.101.050.
(2) Beginning in fiscal year 2027 and each year thereafter, the county moneys appropriated shall be distributed among the eligible counties on a pro rata basis based upon the annual number of cases p.
(2) Beginning in fiscal year 2027 and each year thereafter, the county moneys appropriated shall be distributed among the eligible counties on a pro rata basis based upon the annual number of cases filed in courts under the county's jurisdiction for which a public defender was assigned.
6 SHB 1592 filed in courts under the county's jurisdiction for which a public defender was assigned.
(c) ((Distributions and eligibility for distributions in the 2005-2007 biennium shall be based on 2004 figures for the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (b) of this subsection.
(c) ((Distributions and eligibility for distributions in the 2005-2007 biennium shall be based on 2004 figures for the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (b) of p.
6 HB 1592 this subsection.
The office of the administrator for the courts shall collect data in a manner consistent with the responsibilities outlined in chapter 2.68 RCW detailing the number of cases assigned a public defender and p.
The office of the administrator for the courts shall collect data in a manner consistent with the responsibilities outlined in chapter 2.68 RCW detailing the number of cases assigned a public defender and shall include in its annual report of the courts of Washington the total number of such cases in each county and city.
7 SHB 1592 shall include in its annual report of the courts of Washington the total number of such cases in each county and city.
Sec.
6.
RCW 10.101.080 and 2007 c 59 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
The moneys under RCW 10.101.050 shall be distributed to each city determined to be eligible under this section by the office of public defense.
((Ten percent of the)) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, and in each year thereafter, the state shall appropriate to the office of public defense funds necessary to comply with RCW 10.101.050(1)(b).
The funding appropriated shall be designated as "city moneys" and distributed as follows:
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) ((The)) Beginning in fiscal year 2026, the office of public defense shall ((administer a grant program to select)) distribute the city moneys to the cities eligible to receive city moneys on a pro rata basis based upon the annual number of misdemeanor criminal cases filed in courts under the city's jurisdiction or for which the city is financially responsible for which a public defender was assigned.
((Incorporated cities may apply for grants.
Applying cities must conform to the requirements of RCW 10.101.050 and 10.101.060.)) (2) ((City moneys shall be distributed in a timely manner to accomplish the goals of the grants.
(3) Criteria for award of grants shall be established by the office of public defense after soliciting input from the association of Washington cities.
Award of the grants shall be determined by the office of public defense.)) Under this section the annual number of misdemeanor criminal cases filed in courts under the city's jurisdiction or for which the city is financially responsible for which a public defender was assigned is determined by the most recent annual report of the courts of Washington, as published by the office of the administrator for the courts.
8 SHB 1592
7 HB 1592
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  2. APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  3. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  4. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 9:00 AM.

  5. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  6. Referred to Appropriations.

  7. Minority; do not pass.

  8. CRJ - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  9. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.

  10. Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  11. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 18 co-sponsors · 132 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (18)

Not signed on (132)

132 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 132 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1592?
HB 1592 is sponsored by Julia Reed (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Joe Timmons (Democrat), Janice Zahn (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Darya Farivar (Democrat), Stephanie Barnard (Republican), Mike Steele (Republican), Adison Richards (Democrat), Davina Duerr (Democrat), Skyler Rude (Republican), Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), Greg Nance (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Sam Low (Republican), and Strom Peterson (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1592?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 24, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 1592?
Track HB 1592 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1592

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1592

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →