Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed House 14 D cosponsors

HB 1672 — Addressing technology used by employers in the workplace.

Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 14 sponsors

    1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (14 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

345 added · 343 removed

Plain-language change summary

The new version of House Bill 1672 includes a clearer definition of employers covered under the bill, expanding it to explicitly mention state institutions, agencies, and local governments that employ one or more individuals. Additionally, the revised bill removes a detailed description of what constitutes "health information" regarding physical or mental health status. These changes are significant because they aim to ensure that various employers are held accountable and that there is clarity in how health information is defined. This helps protect employees' rights in their workplaces, making sure that all relevant aspects of employment are fairly governed.

→
Previous
Latest
H-1600.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1672 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Labor & Workplace Standards (originally sponsored by Representatives Kloba, Stonier, Fosse, Doglio, Parshley, Berry, Reed, Cortes, Bronoske, Ryu, Ramel, Scott, Taylor, and Simmons) READ FIRST TIME 02/21/25.
H-0766.1 HOUSE BILL 1672 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Representatives Kloba, Stonier, Fosse, Doglio, Parshley, Berry, Reed, Cortes, Bronoske, Ryu, Ramel, Scott, Taylor, and Simmons Read first time 01/28/25.
Referred to Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards.
1 SHB 1672 identifies a person, whether individually or in combination with other data.
1 HB 1672 identifies a person, whether individually or in combination with other data.
(9) "Employer" means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, business trust, legal representative, or other business entity which engages in any business, industry, profession, or activity in this state and employs one or more employees.
(9) "Employer" means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, business trust, legal representative, or other business entity which engages in any business, industry, profession, or activity in this state and employs one or more employees, and includes the state, any state institution, state agency, political subdivisions of the state, and any municipal corporation or quasi-municipal corporation.
or (c) Relates to the hiring of an individual or employee for a position or job.
or p.
p.
2 HB 1672 (c) Relates to the hiring of an individual or employee for a position or job.
2 SHB 1672 (11) "Essential job function" means a fundamental duty of a job or position that an employee with that job or position must be able to perform.
(11) "Essential job function" means a fundamental duty of a job or position that an employee with that job or position must be able to perform.
Subject to the prohibitions of section 4 of this act, an employer may not engage in electronic monitoring of an employee unless all of the following requirements are met:
An employer may not engage in electronic monitoring of an employee unless all of the following requirements are met:
(a) Assist or allow the employee to accomplish an essential job function;
(b) Monitor production processes or quality;
3 SHB 1672 (c) Ensure compliance with applicable employment or labor laws;
3 HB 1672 (a) Assist or allow the employee to accomplish an essential job function;
(b) Monitor production processes or quality;
(c) Ensure compliance with applicable employment or labor laws;
(f) The name of any person conducting electronic monitoring on the employer's behalf and any associated contract language related to the monitoring;
4 SHB 1672 (g) The name of any person, apart from the employer, who will have access to any data generated by the electronic monitoring and the reason why the person will have access to the data;
4 HB 1672 (f) The name of any person conducting electronic monitoring on the employer's behalf and any associated contract language related to the monitoring;
(g) The name of any person, apart from the employer, who will have access to any data generated by the electronic monitoring and the reason why the person will have access to the data;
(ii) used the electronic monitoring system in relation to the employee within the past 90 days;
(ii) used the electronic monitoring system in relation to p.
5 HB 1672 the employee within the past 90 days;
p.
NEW SECTION.
5 SHB 1672 NEW SECTION.
(1) Notwithstanding the purposes for electronic monitoring set forth in section 2 of this act, electronic monitoring may not be used:
(1) Except for the purposes for electronic monitoring set forth in section 2 of this act, electronic monitoring may not be used:
(2) Any location tracking function of an application or device must be disabled outside of the times when the employee is engaged in activities necessary to accomplish essential job functions.
(3) An employer may not require an employee to physically implant a device on the employee's body for purposes of employee monitoring.
6 SHB 1672 NEW SECTION.
6 HB 1672 (2) Any location tracking function of an application or device must be disabled outside of the times when the employee is engaged in activities necessary to accomplish essential job functions.
(3) An employer may not require an employee to physically implant a device on the employee's body for purposes of employee monitoring.
NEW SECTION.
(a) A detailed description of the automated decision system and its purpose;
p.
7 HB 1672 (a) A detailed description of the automated decision system and its purpose;
p.
(d) The rationale for the use of the system, including reasons for utilizing the system to supplement nonautomated means of decision making;
7 SHB 1672 (d) The rationale for the use of the system, including reasons for utilizing the system to supplement nonautomated means of decision making;
(1) An employer, any person that develops, operates, or maintains electronic monitoring or an automated decision system on behalf of an employer, and any person who collects, stores, analyzes, interprets, disseminates, or otherwise uses data produced or utilized by electronic monitoring or an automated decision system shall implement reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the data to protect employees' personal p.
(1) An employer, any person that develops, operates, or maintains electronic monitoring or an automated decision p.
8 SHB 1672 information from unauthorized or illegal access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure.
8 HB 1672 system on behalf of an employer, and any person who collects, stores, analyzes, interprets, disseminates, or otherwise uses data produced or utilized by electronic monitoring or an automated decision system shall implement reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the data to protect employees' personal information from unauthorized or illegal access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure.
(d) The department shall send the citation and notice of assessment or the determination of compliance to both the employer and the employee by service of process or using a method by which the mailing can be tracked or the delivery can be confirmed to their last known addresses.
9 SHB 1672 (2) If the department's investigation finds that the employee's allegation cannot be substantiated, the department shall issue a determination of compliance to the employee and the employer detailing such finding.
9 HB 1672 (d) The department shall send the citation and notice of assessment or the determination of compliance to both the employer and the employee by service of process or using a method by which the mailing can be tracked or the delivery can be confirmed to their last known addresses.
(2) If the department's investigation finds that the employee's allegation cannot be substantiated, the department shall issue a determination of compliance to the employee and the employer detailing such finding.
(8) In addition to any enforcement authority provided in this chapter or applicable rules, the department may enforce any violation under this chapter or applicable rules by filing an action in the superior court for the county in which the violation is alleged to have occurred.
p.
If the department prevails, it is entitled to p.
10 HB 1672 (8) In addition to any enforcement authority provided in this chapter or applicable rules, the department may enforce any violation under this chapter or applicable rules by filing an action in the superior court for the county in which the violation is alleged to have occurred.
10 SHB 1672 reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in the amount to be determined by the court.
If the department prevails, it is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in the amount to be determined by the court.
11 SHB 1672
11 HB 1672
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  2. Referred to Appropriations.

  3. Minority; do not pass.

  4. LAWS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  5. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.

  6. Public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 10:30 AM.

  7. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 137 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (137)

137 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 137 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1672?
HB 1672 is sponsored by Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), Shaun Scott (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Dan Bronoske (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat), Shelley Kloba (Democrat), and Julio Cortes (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1672?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 1672?
Track HB 1672 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1672

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1672

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →