SB 6284 — Providing consumer protections for artificial intelligence systems.
Last action — Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
563 added · 688 removedPlain-language change summary
The legislative amendments to SB 6284 clarify the definition of "algorithmic discrimination" in relation to artificial intelligence systems. Specifically, the wording around what constitutes such discrimination has been refined to ensure a better understanding, emphasizing that it does not include the use of high-risk AI systems for testing or efforts to enhance diversity. Additionally, the language regarding consumer access to various services has been streamlined, removing redundant phrases related to parole and releasing processes. These changes are significant as they aim to provide clearer guidelines for developers using AI, while also safeguarding against discrimination in crucial areas like employment and education.
S-4569.2S-3753.4 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6284 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Environment, Energy & Technology (originally sponsored by Senators Liias, Boehnke, Shewmake, Harris, Conway, Hasegawa, Nobles, Stanford, and Wagoner)Wagoner READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/04/26.01/22/26.
Referred to Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology.
1 SSBSB 6284 from discriminatory actions.
(1)(a)(1) "Algorithmic discrimination"discrimination": means the use of an artificial intelligence system which results in any unlawful differential impact that disfavors any individual or group of individuals on the basis of chapter 49.60 RCW or federal law.
(b)(a) "AlgorithmicMeans discrimination"the doesuse notof include:an artificial intelligence system which results in any unlawful differential impact that disfavors any individual or group of individuals on the basis of chapter 49.60 RCW or federal law;
and (b) Does not include the following:
or (B) Expandingexpanding an applicant, customer, or participant pool to increase diversity or redress historic discrimination;
2 SSBSB 6284 (2) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content generation.
(3) "Consequential decision" means any decision that has a material legal or similarly significant effect on the provision or denial of any consumerconsumer's access to:
(a) Pardon, parole, probation, or anyrelease; other release from incarceration or court supervision;
(b) Education enrollment or an education opportunity;
(c) AccessEmployment; to employment;
(f) AccessHealth to health care services;
(4)(a)(4) "Consumer" means aany personindividual who is a resident of this statestate. and is acting only in an individual or household context.
(b) "Consumer" does not include a person acting in a commercial or employment context.
(6) "Deployer" means any person doing business in this state that deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system to make a consequential decision in the state.
(8)(a)(8) "High-risk artificial intelligence system"system": means any artificial intelligence system that is specifically intended to autonomously make, or be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision without meaningful human consideration.
(b)(a) "High-riskMeans any artificial intelligence system"system doesdesigned notby include:its developer to, when deployed, make, or is a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision;
and (b) Does not include:
p.(C) Perform a preparatory task to an assessment relevant to a consequential decision;
3 SSB 6284 (C) Perform a preparatory task to an assessment relevant to a consequential decision;
(ii)p. Any antifraud technology, antimalware, antivirus, calculator, cybersecurity, database, data storage, firewall, internet domain registration, internet website loading, networking, robocall- filtering, spam-filtering, spellchecking, spreadsheet, webcaching, webhosting, search engine, or similar technology;
3 SB 6284 (ii) Any antifraud technology, antimalware, antivirus, calculator, cybersecurity, database, data storage, firewall, internet domain registration, internet website loading, networking, robocall- filtering, spam-filtering, spellchecking, spreadsheet, webcaching, webhosting, search engine, or similar technology;
(9)(a)(9) "Intentional and substantial modification" or "intentionally and substantially modifies" means a deliberate change made to:to an artificial intelligence system that materially increases the risk of algorithmic discrimination.
(i)(10) An"Person" artificialmeans intelligence system that at the time when the change is implemented and any timeindividual, thereafter,association, resultscorporation, inlimited anyliability newcompany, materialpartnership, risktrust, ofor algorithmicother discrimination;legal entity.
or(11) (ii)"Substantial Afactor" generalmeans purposea artificialfactor intelligence model that affectsis: compliance of the general purpose artificial intelligence model, materially changes the purpose of the general purpose artificial intelligence model, or results in any new reasonably foreseeable risk of algorithmic discrimination.
(b)(a) "IntentionalConsidered andwhen substantialmaking modification"a doesconsequential notdecision; include:
(i)(b) AnyLikely customizationto madealter by deployers that is based on legitimate nondiscriminatory business justifications, is within the scopeoutcome and purpose of the artificial intelligence tool, and that does not result in a materialconsequential changedecision; to the risks of algorithmic discrimination;
orand (ii)(c) AnyWeighed changemore madeheavily toby a high-riskdeployer artificial intelligence system, or the performance of a high-risk artificial intelligence system, if the high-riskapplicable artificialhigh- intelligencerisk system continues to learn after such high-risk artificial intelligence system isthan offered,any sold,other leased,factor licensed,contributing given, or otherwise made available to a deployer, or deployed, and such change is made to the high-riskconsequential artificialdecision. intelligence system as a result of learning after the system is offered, sold, leased, licensed, given, or otherwise made available to the deployer or deployed and predetermined by the p.
4 SSB 6284 deployer or a third party contracted by the deployer and included within the initial impact assessment of such high-risk artificial intelligence system as required in section 6 of this act.
(10) "Meaningful human consideration" means review or oversight by one or more individuals who have training or expertise in the decision being made and who have the authority to alter the decision under review.
(11)(a) "Person" means any individual, association, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, trust, or other legal entity.
(b) "Person" does not include any government or political subdivision.
(12)(a) "Substantial factor" means a factor that:
(i) Uses the principal basis for making a consequential decision;
(ii) Is capable of altering the outcome of a consequential decision;
and (iii) Is generated by an artificial intelligence system.
(b) "Substantial factor" does not include any use of an artificial intelligence system to generate any content, decision, prediction, or recommendation concerning a consumer that is used as the principal basis to make a consequential decision concerning the consumer.
(b) In any enforcement action brought on or after July 1, 2027, by the attorney general pursuant to section 109 of this act, there is a rebuttable presumption that a deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system used reasonable care as required under this section if the deployer complied with this chapter.
(b) If a deployer subsequently discovers that the high-risk artificial intelligence system has caused algorithmic discrimination, the deployer, without unreasonable delay, but no later than 90 days after the date of the discovery, shall send to the attorney general, p.
Show all 137 changed lines (97 more)
54 SSBSB 6284 after the date of the discovery, shall send to the attorney general, in a form and manner prescribed by the attorney general, a notice disclosing the discovery.
(1) Beginning July 1, 2027, and except as provided in section 65(6) (6) of this act, each deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall implement and maintain a risk management policy and program to govern the deployer's deployment of a high-risk artificial intelligence system.
or (B) Complies with any risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems that the attorney general, in the attorney general's discretion, may designate.
p.
6 SSB 6284 (c) A risk management policy and program implemented and maintained pursuant to this subsection (2) may cover multiple high- risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the deployer.
(3) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a deployer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or proprietary information.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
5.
(1) Beginning July 1, 2027, and except as provided in section 6(6) of this act, each developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall implement and maintain a risk management policy and program to govern the developer's deployment of a high-risk artificial intelligence system.
(2)(a) The risk management policy and program must specify and incorporate the principles, processes, and personnel that the deployer uses to identify, document, and mitigate known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.
The risk management policy and program must include an iterative process that is planned, implemented, and regularly and systematically reviewed and updated over the life cycle of the high-risk artificial intelligence system.
(b) A risk management policy and program implemented and maintained pursuant to this subsection must be reasonable, considering:
(i) The size and complexity of the developer;
(ii) The nature and scope of the high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the developer including, but not limited to, the intended uses of such high-risk artificial intelligence systems;
(iii) The sensitivity and volume of data processed in connection with the high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the developer;
and (iv) A risk management framework that either:
(A) Adheres to the guidance and standards set forth in the latest version of the artificial intelligence risk management framework published by the national institute of standards and technology, ISO/IEC 42001, or another nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems, if the standards are substantially equivalent to or more stringent than the requirements;
75 SSBSB 6284 (B) Complies with any risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems that the attorney general, in the attorney general's discretion, may designate.
(3) ANothing developerin thatthis alsosection serves as a deployer for any high-risk artificial intelligence system may not be requiredconstrued to generaterequire thea documentationdeployer required by this section unless such high-risk artificial intelligence system is provided to andisclose unaffiliatedany entitytrade actingsecret, asor aother deployerconfidential or asproprietary otherwiseinformation. required by law.
(4) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a developer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or proprietary information.
(5) This section does not apply to a developer with fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees.
6.5.
p.(ii) The outputs the high-risk artificial intelligence system produces;
8 SSB 6284 (ii) The outputs the high-risk artificial intelligence system produces;
(iv) A description of any transparency measures taken concerning the high-risk artificial intelligence system, such as any measures taken to disclose to a consumer that such high-risk artificial intelligencep. system is in use when such high-risk artificial intelligence system is in use;
6 SB 6284 intelligence system is in use when such high-risk artificial intelligence system is in use;
p.NEW SECTION.
9 SSB 6284 NEW SECTION.
7.6.
(1) The requirements in sectionssection 45 (1) through (3) of this act and 6section 3(2) of this act do not apply to a deployer if, at the time the deployer deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system and at all times while the high-risk artificial intelligence system is deployed:
(i)p. Employs fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees;
7 SB 6284 (i) Employs fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees;
and (ii) Includes information that is substantially similar to the information in the impact assessment required under section 65 of this act.
8.7.
(1) Notify the consumer that the deployer has deployed ana high- risk artificial intelligence system to make, or be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision before the decision is made;
9.8.
p.(a) Restrict a developer's, deployer's, or other person's ability to:
10 SSB 6284 (a) Restrict a developer's, deployer's, or other person's ability to:
(ii)p. Comply with a civil, criminal, or regulatory inquiry, investigation, subpoena, or summons by federal, state, municipal, or other governmental authorities;
8 SB 6284 (ii) Comply with a civil, criminal, or regulatory inquiry, investigation, subpoena, or summons by federal, state, municipal, or other governmental authorities;
p.(A) By a federal agency, such as the federal food and drug administration or the federal aviation administration, acting within the scope of such federal agency's authority;
11 SSB 6284 (A) By a federal agency, such as the federal food and drug administration or thep. federal aviation administration, acting within the scope of such federal agency's authority;
or9 SB 6284 (B) In compliance with standards established by any federal agency including, but not limited to, standards established by the federal office of the national coordinator for health information technology;
or (iv) That is a covered entity or business associate within the meaning of the health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, P.L.
104-191, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, as both may be amended from time to time, and is:providing health care recommendations that:
(A) ProvidingAre health care recommendations that are generated by an artificial intelligence systemsystem; and require a health care provider to take action to implement such recommendations;
or (B) UtilizingRequire ana artificial intelligence system for health care operations,provider performance,to andtake qualityaction improvementto purposesimplement including,such butrecommendations; not limited to, administrative, quality measurement, security, patient access, scheduling, referral management, transfer coordination, care coordination, bed management, or eligibility screening;
(d)and Apply(C) toAre any artificial intelligence system that is acquired by or for the federal government or any federal agency or department including, but not limitedconsidered to,to thebe Unitedhigh Statesrisk; department of commerce, the United States department of defense, or the national aeronautics and space administration, unless such artificial intelligence system is a high-risk artificial intelligence system p.
12or SSB(d) 6284Apply to any artificial intelligence system that is acquired by or for the federal government or any federal agency or department including, but not limited to, the United States department of commerce, the United States department of defense, or the national aeronautics and space administration, unless such artificial intelligence system is a high-risk artificial intelligence system that is used to make, or as a substantial factor in making, a decision concerning employment or housing;housing.
(e) Apply to any insurer, or any high-risk artificial intelligence system developed by or for or deployed by an insurer for use in the business of insurance, if such insurer is regulated and supervised by the office of the insurance commissioner or a comparable federal regulating body and:
(i) Is subject to examination by such entity under any existing statutes, rules, or regulations pertaining to unfair trade practices and unfair discrimination prohibited under RCW 48.30.300, or published guidance or regulations that apply to the use of high-risk artificial intelligence systems;
and (ii) Such guidance or regulations aid in the prevention and mitigation of algorithmic discrimination caused by the use of a high- risk artificial intelligence system or any risk of algorithmic discrimination that is reasonably foreseeable as a result of the use of a high-risk artificial intelligence system;
(f) Delegate existing regulatory oversight of the business of insurance to any department or agency other than the office of the insurance commissioner;
or (g) Apply to any financial institution.
For purposes of this subsection, "financial institution" includes the following:
(i) A bank, foreign bank, national bank, mutual savings bank, or savings association, as defined in RCW 30A.04.010;
(ii) A credit union, out-of-state credit union, or federal credit union as defined in RCW 31.12.005;
(iii) A mortgage lender as defined in RCW 43.180.020;
or (iv) Any subsidiary, affiliate, or service provider of an entity listed in (g)(i) through (iii) of this subsection.
10.9.
(1)(a) The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state, or as parens patriae on behalf of personsp. residing in the state, to enforce this chapter.
For10 actionsSB brought6284 bypersons theresiding attorneyin generalthe state, to enforce this chapter,chapter. a violation of this chapter is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter p.
13For SSBactions 6284brought by the attorney general to enforce this chapter, a violation of this chapter is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW.
(c) This chapter may be enforced solely by the attorney general under the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW, and may not be construed as providing the basis for, or be subject to, a private right of action for violations of this chapter.
This chapter does not incorporate RCW 19.86.093.
11.10.
12.11.
Sections 1 through 109 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 19 RCW.
12.
Section 10 of this act constitutes a new chapter in Title 42 RCW.
Sec.
Section 11 of this act constitutes a new chapter in Title 42 RCW.
p.
14 SSB 6284 Sec.
14.
(1)p. ((Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, a)) A task force to assess current uses and trends and make recommendations to the legislature regarding guidelines and potential legislation for the use of artificial intelligence systems is established.
11 SB 6284 (1) ((Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, a)) A task force to assess current uses and trends and make recommendations to the legislature regarding guidelines and potential legislation for the use of artificial intelligence systems is established.
(i) The executive committee shall define the scope of activity and subject matter focus required of the subcommittees including, but p.not limited to:
15 SSB 6284 not limited to:
government and publicp. sector efficiency;
12 SB 6284 public sector efficiency;
(a) A literature review of public policy issues with artificial intelligence, including benefits and risks to the public broadly, historically excluded communities, and other identifiable groups, p.racial equity considerations, workforce impacts, and ethical concerns;
16p. SSB 6284 racial equity considerations, workforce impacts, and ethical concerns;
13 SB 6284 (b) A review of existing protections under state and federal law for individual data and privacy rights, safety, civil rights, and intellectual property rights, and how federal, state, and local laws relating to artificial intelligence align, differ, conflict, and interact across levels of government;
(k) Racial equity issues posed by artificial intelligence systems and ways to mitigate the concerns to build equity into the systems;
1714 SSBSB 6284 (k)(l) RacialCivil equityliberties issues posed by artificial intelligence systems and wayscivil torights mitigateand thecivil concernsliberties protections to buildbe equityincorporated into theartificial intelligence systems;
(l) Civil liberties issues posed by artificial intelligence systems and civil rights and civil liberties protections to be incorporated into artificial intelligence systems;
A preliminary report must be delivered by December 31, 2024, an interim report by p.December 1, 2025, and a final report by July 1, ((2026)) 2027.
18p. SSB 6284 December 1, 2025, and a final report by July 1, ((2026)) 2027.
15 SB 6284 Meeting summaries must be posted to the website of the attorney general's office within 30 days of any meeting by the task force.
15.14.
The artificial intelligence workplace advisory group shall report to the p.artificial intelligence task force established in section 2, chapter 163, Laws of 2024 as prescribed in subsection (4) of this section.
19p. SSB 6284 artificial intelligence task force established in section 2, chapter 163, Laws of 2024 as prescribed in subsection (4) of this section.
16 SB 6284 (2) The attorney general shall appoint the following members to the artificial intelligence workplace advisory group:
(a) Two members representing statewidedifferent labor organizations where the statewide labor organizationorganizations; represents at least 200,000 union members in Washington state;
2017 SSBSB 6284
Show all 137 changed rows (97 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
ENET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 1:30 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.
Sponsors
- Keith Wagoner · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- T'wina Nobles · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Paul Harris · Cosponsor
- Sharon Shewmake · Cosponsor
- Matt Boehnke · Cosponsor
- Marko Liias · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Marko Liias Democrat
Co-sponsors (8)
- Keith Wagoner Republican
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Paul Harris Republican
- Sharon Shewmake Democrat
- Matt Boehnke Republican
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6284?
- SB 6284 is sponsored by Keith Wagoner (Republican), Derek Stanford (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Paul Harris (Republican), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Matt Boehnke (Republican), and Marko Liias (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 6284?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 6284?
- Track SB 6284 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6284
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6284
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →