SB 5797 — Enacting a tax on stocks, bonds, and other financial intangible assets for the benefit of public schools.
Last action — Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. On motion, referred to Ways & Means.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
30 sponsors
1 primary, 29 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (30 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
396 added · 382 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to SB 5797 have reduced the tax rate on financial intangible assets like stocks and bonds from $10 to $5 per $1,000 of value. Additionally, the bill now specifies that a certain amount, specifically $50 million, will be exempt from the tax rather than all assets below this threshold. These adjustments are significant because they aim to make the tax more manageable for individuals and families while still generating funds to support public schools and education programs. This aims to create a fairer tax system, helping to alleviate the burden on lower-income residents.
S-2248.5ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5797 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Frame, Dhingra, Alvarado, Bateman, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, Pedersen, Ramos, Riccelli, Stanford, Trudeau, Valdez, Wellman, and C.
AN ACT Relating to enacting a wealth tax on stocks, bonds, and other financial intangible assets for the benefit of public schools;
1 SBESB 5797 associated with serving the needs of students with disabilities and the growing daily operating costs of districts.
The legislature intends to levy a wealth tax of $10$5 on every $1,000 of the true and fair value of certain financial intangible assets, such as stocks and bonds, while exempting retirement savings, college savings, and ownership interests in private companies and partnerships.
Additionally, to continue to make progress toward the state having a fair and balanced tax system that works for all residents, the legislature intends to exempt stocks,up bonds,to and$50,000,000 otherin financial intangible assets if the combined true and fair value of suchtaxable assetsfinancial ownedintangible byassets. the person is less than $50,000,000.
Revenues generated from this tax will be dedicated to the education legacy trust account for the support of public schools, early learning, child care, and higher education.
By exempting allup stocks,to bonds,$50,000,000 andin othertrue financialand intangiblefair assetsvalue ownedof bytaxable afinancial personintangible with less than $50,000,000 of such assets, this tax is estimated to impact just 4,300 Washingtonians, taking a significant step toward reducing the disproportionate reliance on low and middle-income households to fund p.
2 SBESB 5797 households to fund public schools as we strive to meet our state's paramount duty and honor our commitment to our kids.
3 SBESB 5797 contracts, favorable financing agreements, reputation, exceptional management, prestige, good name, integrity of a business, private nongovernmental personal service contracts, and private nongovernmental athletic or sports franchises or agreements.
4 SBESB 5797 (ii) "Close associates" means natural persons who are in close association with another natural person by reason of a family, marital, personal, or business relationship.
The tax equals $10$5 per $1,000 of the true and fair value of a resident's taxable worldwide intangible assets.
5 SBESB 5797 trust is treated as an incomplete gift under Title 26 U.S.C.
(7) All moneys collected from the intangible assets tax must be deposited into the stateeducation generallegacy fundtrust foraccount thecreated supportin ofRCW common83.100.230. schools.
6 SBESB 5797 (B) Any other circumstance that, in the department's judgment, renders the filing of a joint return manifestly unreasonable.
7 SBESB 5797 four years after the year in which a return is filed under section 4 of this act except as provided in RCW 82.32.050(4).
(1) FinancialUp intangibleto assets$50,000,000 ownedof by a Washingtontaxpayer's residentfinancial who owns worldwide intangible assets not exempt under subsections (2) through (13) of this sectionsection. with a combined true and fair value of less than $50,000,000 as of December 31st of the tax year;
A taxpayer may only exempt an asset, under this subsection (1), in its entirety from the tax imposed under this chapter.
The department must disallow the exemption under this subsection (1) of any asset if such exemption would result in a taxpayer exempting any combination of more than $50,000,000 of assets from the tax imposed under this chapter for the tax year.
A Washington resident claiming an exemption under this subsection (1) must identify each asset, along with the asset's true and fair value as of December 31st of the tax year, for which they are claiming the exemption in a form and manner prescribed by the department.
For purposes of this exemption, both spouses or state registered domestic partners are considered to be one taxpayer.
If the department authorizes the filing of separate returns for a tax year, each spouse or state registered domestic partner may exempt up to $25,000,000 of their financial intangible assets under this subsection (1) for that tax year;
457(b) of the internalp. revenue code, an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity described in Title 26 U.S.C.
8 ESB 5797 internal revenue code, an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity described in Title 26 U.S.C.
p.(9) Any obligations or evidences of debt of the United States and obligations of United States government agencies and corporations established by acts of the congress of the United States to the extent required by federal law to be exempt from taxation by the states;
8 SB 5797 (9) Any obligations or evidences of debt of the United States and obligations of United States government agencies and corporations established by acts of the congress of the United States to the extent required by federal law to be exempt from taxation by the states;
(1) Financial intangible assets subject to a similar tax legally imposed on the property and paid by the taxpayerp. to another state for the same tax year are exempt from taxation.
9 ESB 5797 taxpayer to another state for the same tax year are exempt from taxation.
p.NEW SECTION.
9 SB 5797 NEW SECTION.
(3)p. Any determination under this section must be made without regard to community property laws.
10 ESB 5797 (3) Any determination under this section must be made without regard to community property laws.
p.(6)(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an individual seeking relief under this section may not seek relief for taxes on intangible assets derived from disqualified assets.
10 SB 5797 (6)(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an individual seeking relief under this section may not seek relief for taxes on intangible assets derived from disqualified assets.
No relief granted under this section may reduce the combinedp. tax liability of individuals required to jointly file a return under this chapter in any given tax year.
(8)11 AnyESB relief5797 grantedcombined undertax thisliability sectionof mayindividuals notrequired resultto injointly anfile increasea inreturn the exemption amount under sectionthis 6chapter (1)in ofany thisgiven act.tax year.
Nothing(8) inAny thisrelief sectiongranted shall be construed to permit individuals required to jointly file a return under this chaptersection tomay claimnot aresult combinedin exemptionan underincrease sectionin 6(1) of this act exceeding the limitexemption establishedamount inunder section 6(1) of this act.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit individuals required to jointly file a return under this chapter to claim a combined exemption under section 6(1) of this act exceeding the limit established in section 6 (1) of this act.
(10) The department may by rule provide a method or methods for allocating assets between individuals required to jointly file returns under this chapter in cases where one of the individuals is p.granted relief under this section.
11 SB 5797 granted relief under this section.
After the conference the department may make such determinationp. as may appear to it to be just and lawful and shall mail a copy of its determination to the petitioner, or provide a copy of its determination electronically as provided in RCW 82.32.135.
Show all 59 changed lines (19 more)
12 ESB 5797 determination as may appear to it to be just and lawful and shall mail a copy of its determination to the petitioner, or provide a copy of its determination electronically as provided in RCW 82.32.135.
A petition under this subsection (3) is due within 30 days after the date the department p.issued its denial of relief under section 8 of this act.
12 SB 5797 issued its denial of relief under section 8 of this act.
(3)p. The penalty imposed in this section is in addition to any other applicable penalties imposed under this chapter or chapter 82.32 RCW on the same tax due, except for the penalty imposed in RCW 82.32.090(7).
13 ESB 5797 (3) The penalty imposed in this section is in addition to any other applicable penalties imposed under this chapter or chapter 82.32 RCW on the same tax due, except for the penalty imposed in RCW 82.32.090(7).
p.NEW SECTION.
13 SB 5797 NEW SECTION.
To accomplish this purpose, it is the legislature'sp. intent to stop transactions or arrangements that are designed to unfairly avoid taxes.
14 ESB 5797 legislature's intent to stop transactions or arrangements that are designed to unfairly avoid taxes.
p.(c) Whether an arrangement or transaction is a reasonable means of accomplishing a substantial nontax purpose;
14 SB 5797 (c) Whether an arrangement or transaction is a reasonable means of accomplishing a substantial nontax purpose;
((and)) (c) Arrangements through which a taxpayer attempts to avoid tax under chapter 82.08 or 82.12 RCW by engaging in a transaction to disguise its purchase or use of tangible personal property by vesting legal title or other ownership interest in another entity over which thep. taxpayer exercises control in such a manner as to effectively retain control of the tangible personal property;
15 ESB 5797 the taxpayer exercises control in such a manner as to effectively retain control of the tangible personal property;
(4) In determining whether a transaction or arrangement comes within the scope of subsection (3) of this section, the department is p.not required to prove a taxpayer's subjective intent in engaging in the transaction or arrangement.
15 SB 5797 not required to prove a taxpayer's subjective intent in engaging in the transaction or arrangement.
NEWp. SECTION.
16 ESB 5797 NEW SECTION.
This act may be known and cited as the "intangible"financial intangible assets propertywealth tax act." NEW SECTION.
1617 SBESB 5797
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Engrossed Bill pdf
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. On motion, referred to Ways & Means.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
First reading, referred to Finance.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 26; nays, 21; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill not substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 4:00 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Ways & Means.
Sponsors
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Yasmin Trudeau · Cosponsor
- Yasmin Trudeau · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Marcus Riccelli · Cosponsor
- Marcus Riccelli · Cosponsor
- Jamie Pedersen · Cosponsor
- Jamie Pedersen · Cosponsor
- T'wina Nobles · Cosponsor
- T'wina Nobles · Cosponsor
- Liz Lovelett · Cosponsor
- Liz Lovelett · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Jessica Bateman · Cosponsor
- Jessica Bateman · Cosponsor
- Emily Alvarado · Cosponsor
- Emily Alvarado · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Noel Frame · Cosponsor
- Noel Frame · Primary
- Bill Ramos · Cosponsor
- Javier Valdez · Cosponsor
- Javier Valdez · Cosponsor
- Bill Ramos · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 29 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 21 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Noel Frame Democrat
Co-sponsors (29)
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Yasmin Trudeau Democrat
- Yasmin Trudeau Democrat
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Marcus Riccelli Democrat
- Marcus Riccelli Democrat
- Jamie Pedersen Democrat
- Jamie Pedersen Democrat
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
- Liz Lovelett Democrat
- Liz Lovelett Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Jessica Bateman Democrat
- Jessica Bateman Democrat
- Emily Alvarado Democrat
- Emily Alvarado Democrat
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Noel Frame Democrat
- Bill Ramos Democrat
- Javier Valdez Democrat
- Javier Valdez Democrat
- Bill Ramos Democrat
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 44% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (48)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Nay |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Nay |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5797?
- SB 5797 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Yasmin Trudeau (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Marcus Riccelli (Democrat), Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Jessica Bateman (Democrat), Emily Alvarado (Democrat), Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Noel Frame (Democrat), Bill Ramos (Democrat), and Javier Valdez (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5797?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 5797?
- Track SB 5797 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5797
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5797
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →