Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 6 D cosponsors

SB 6239 — Requiring arbitration for tort claims against the state of Washington and its subdivisions.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 20, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

46 added · 105 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 6239 has removed a section that emphasized the idea that suing the government is a right that deserves strong legal protections. Instead, it now highlights that the government has the authority to decide how and where individuals can sue, without it being seen as a fundamental right. This change is significant because it shifts the focus to the government's discretion in managing liability claims, potentially making it easier for the state to impose conditions on such lawsuits, which could affect the ability of individuals to seek compensation for government negligence.

→
Previous
Latest
S-4425.2 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6239 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, Pedersen, Conway, Liias, Robinson, and C.
S-3953.2 SENATE BILL 6239 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Dhingra, Pedersen, Conway, Liias, Robinson, and C.
Wilson) READ FIRST TIME 01/30/26.
Wilson Read first time 01/20/26.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
amending RCW 7.06.020, 4.92.090, and 4.96.010;
amending RCW 7.06.020;
(2) The legislature finds that the right to sue the government is not considered a privilege or immunity requiring heightened scrutiny analysis by the courts.
(2) The legislature finds that its power to control and regulate the right of suit against it is plenary.
The right to pursue a government tort liability claim in court is not a fundamental right of state citizenship.
Article II, section 26 of our state Constitution gives p.
1 SSB 6239 the legislature the sole authority to decide in what manner, and in what courts, suits may be brought against the state, rather than it being a fundamental right provided by the state Constitution itself, so long as it conforms to the equal protection guarantees of the state and federal constitutions.
A distinction based on the age of claims serves a legitimate state interest in that it rationally relates to the purpose of the statute, to address old cases and provide all claimants justice by encouraging negotiation and fair settlement, and providing a fair but streamlined resolution that is less expensive and more efficient for all parties involved.
(3) The legislature further finds that its power to control and regulate the right of suit against the state is plenary.
Further, the state supreme court has consistently acknowledged this constitutional duty includes the power to establish conditions precedent before suit can be brought against the state, including the placement of reasonable procedural burdens that may be placed on tort claimants as long as such burdens are not substantial and do not constitute a real impediment to relief.
Further, the state supreme court has consistently acknowledged this constitutional duty includes the p.
The legislature therefore finds it necessary to protect the public treasury from increasing liability while providing a structured, fair process through arbitration for persons who seek compensation for injuries caused by government.
1 SB 6239 power to establish conditions precedent before suit can be brought against the state, including the placement of reasonable procedural burdens that may be placed on tort claimants as long as such burdens are not substantial and do not constitute a real impediment to relief.
The legislature therefore finds it necessary to protect the public treasury from increasing liability while providing a structured, fair process through arbitration for persons who seek compensation for injuries caused by government negligence.
The p.
The arbitrability of any such action shall not be affected by the amount or number of payments involved.
2 SSB 6239 arbitrability of any such action shall not be affected by the amount or number of payments involved.
(3) All tort claims against the state or any of its subdivisions are subject to civil arbitration for any dollar amount prior to being scheduled for trial.
(3)(a) All tort claims against the state or against the state's officers, employees, or volunteers under RCW 4.92.100, and local governmental entities under RCW 4.96.010 and their officers, employees, or volunteers are subject to civil arbitration for any dollar amount prior to being scheduled for trial where the claims arise out of conduct or a pattern of conduct when the claimant was an adult and 10 or more years have passed, or when the claimant was a minor when the conduct or pattern of conduct for the claim occurred and 10 or more years have passed since the claimant became an adult.
(b) Except as provided in (a) of this subsection, all tort claims against the state or against the state's officers, employees, or volunteers under RCW 4.92.100, and local governmental entities under RCW 4.96.010 and their officers, employees, or volunteers may be subject to arbitration for any dollar amount prior to being scheduled for trial upon agreement of the parties.
Sec.
3.
RCW 4.92.090 and 1963 c 159 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
((The)) Except as provided in RCW 7.06.020(3), the state of Washington, whether acting in its governmental or proprietary capacity, shall be liable for damages arising out of its tortious conduct to the same extent as if it were a private person or corporation.
Sec.
4.
RCW 4.96.010 and 2011 c 258 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) ((All)) Except as provided in RCW 7.06.020(3), all local governmental entities, whether acting in a governmental or proprietary capacity, shall be liable for damages arising out of their tortious conduct, or the tortious conduct of their past or present officers, employees, or volunteers while performing or in good faith purporting to perform their official duties, to the same extent as if they were a private person or corporation.
Filing a claim for damages within the time allowed by law shall be a condition precedent to the commencement of any action claiming damages.
The laws specifying the content for such claims shall be liberally construed so that substantial compliance therewith will be deemed satisfactory.
p.
3 SSB 6239 (2) Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, for the purposes of this chapter, "local governmental entity" means a county, city, town, special district, municipal corporation as defined in RCW 39.50.010, quasi-municipal corporation, any joint municipal utility services authority, any entity created by public agencies under RCW 39.34.030, or public hospital.
(3) For the purposes of this chapter, "volunteer" is defined according to RCW 51.12.035.
5.
3.
4 SSB 6239
2 SB 6239
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  3. Third reading, passed; yeas, 33; nays, 16; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  4. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  5. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  6. 2nd substitute bill substituted (WM 26).

  7. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  8. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  9. Minority; without recommendation.

  10. Minority; do not pass.

  11. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  12. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:30 AM.

  13. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  14. On motion, referred to Ways & Means.

  15. Minority; without recommendation.

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  19. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.

  20. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 14 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 33 Yea · 16 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 171300
Republican 16300
Total 331600
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Nay
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Nay
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Nay
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Nay
Noel Frame Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Nay
Tina Orwall Democrat Nay
Vandana Slatter Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Nay
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6239?
SB 6239 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), June Robinson (Democrat), Marko Liias (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), and Manka Dhingra (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6239?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 20, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 6239?
Track SB 6239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6239

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6239

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →