Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 6 D cosponsors

SB 6246 — Concerning emissions from emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities under the climate commitment act.

Last action — Effective date 6/11/2026.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Bob Ferguson (Democratic) on March 30, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

311 added · 353 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 6246 clarifies how emissions-intensive and trade-exposed facilities will receive allowances for carbon emissions. It specifies that these facilities can receive up to 100% of their emissions allowances based on a mass-based baseline from 2015 to 2019, rather than a carbon intensity benchmark if they find it difficult to calculate one. This change aims to simplify the process for companies that may struggle with complex emissions calculations and ensures they still receive the necessary allowances to operate without financial strain.

→
Previous
Latest
S-3970.1 SENATE BILL 6246 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Slatter, Shewmake, and Saldaña Read first time 01/20/26.
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6246 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Slatter, Shewmake, and Saldaña Read first time 01/20/26.
1 SB 6246 (b) Paper manufacturing, including pulp mills, paper mills, and paperboard milling, North American industry classification system codes beginning with 322;
1 ESB 6246 (b) Paper manufacturing, including pulp mills, paper mills, and paperboard milling, North American industry classification system codes beginning with 322;
2 SB 6246 criteria adopted by rule is also eligible for treatment as emissions- intensive, trade-exposed and is eligible for allocation of no cost allowances as described in this section.
2 ESB 6246 criteria adopted by rule is also eligible for treatment as emissions- intensive, trade-exposed and is eligible for allocation of no cost allowances as described in this section.
(b) For the four years beginning January 2027 and in each subsequent four-year period, the annual allocation of no cost allowances established in (a) of this subsection shall be adjusted according to the benchmark reduction schedules established in (b)(ii) and (iii) and (e) of this subsection multiplied by the facility's actual production during the period, except as provided in subsection (9) of this section.
(b) For the four years beginning January 2027 and in each subsequent four-year period, the annual allocation of no cost allowances established in (a) of this subsection shall be adjusted according to the benchmark reduction schedules established in (b)(ii) and (iii) and (e) of this subsection multiplied by the facility's actual production during the period.
The department shall adjust the no cost allocation of allowances and credits to an emissions-intensive and trade-exposed facility to avoid duplication with any no cost allowances transferred pursuant to RCW 70A.65.120 and 70A.65.130, if applicable.
The department shall adjust the no cost allocation of allowances and credits to an emissions- intensive and trade-exposed facility to avoid duplication with any no cost allowances transferred pursuant to RCW 70A.65.120 and 70A.65.130, if applicable.
The mass-based baseline must be based upon data from 2015 through 2019, unless the emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility can demonstrate that there have been abnormal periods of operation that p.
The mass-based baseline must be based upon data from 2015 through 2019, unless the emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility can demonstrate that there have been abnormal periods of operation that materially impacted the facility and the baseline period should be p.
3 SB 6246 materially impacted the facility and the baseline period should be expanded to include years prior to 2015.
3 ESB 6246 expanded to include years prior to 2015.
For each year during the years 2027 through 2030, these facilities must be awarded no cost allowances equal to 97 percent of the facility's mass-based baseline, except as provided in subsection (9) of this section.
For each year during the years 2027 through 2030, these facilities must be awarded no cost allowances equal to 97 percent of the facility's mass-based baseline.
For each year during the years 2031 through 2034, these facilities must be awarded no cost allowances equal to 94 percent of the facility's mass-based baseline , except as provided in subsection (9) of this section.
For each year during the years 2031 through 2034, these facilities must be awarded no cost allowances equal to 94 percent of the facility's mass-based baseline.
(d) During the years 2023 through 2026, each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility must record its facility-specific carbon intensity baseline based on its actual production.
4 SB 6246 (d) During the years 2023 through 2026, each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility must record its facility-specific carbon intensity baseline based on its actual production.
4 ESB 6246 (e)(i) For the years 2027 through 2030, the second period benchmark for each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility is three percent below the first period baseline specified in (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection.
(e)(i) For the years 2027 through 2030, the second period benchmark for each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility is three percent below the first period baseline specified in (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection.
p.
(4)(a) By December 1, 2026, the department shall provide ((a report to the appropriate committees of the senate and house of representatives that describes alternative methods for determining p.
5 SB 6246 (4)(a) By December 1, 2026, the department shall provide ((a report to the appropriate committees of the senate and house of representatives that describes alternative methods for determining the amount and a schedule of allowances to be provided to facilities owned or operated by each covered entity designated as an emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility from)) recommendations for the consideration of the legislature regarding the schedule of allowances to be provided to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050.
5 ESB 6246 the amount and a schedule of allowances to be provided to facilities owned or operated by each covered entity designated as an emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility from)) recommendations for the consideration of the legislature regarding the schedule of allowances to be provided to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050.
(i) A proposed method for making annual reductions to emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility allowance allocation that would ensure total no-cost allowances allocated to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities align with the annual allowance budgets established by the department under RCW 70A.65.070 and are consistent with the emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020, including the percentage reductions in emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility allowance allocation that would be applied each year from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050;
(i) A proposed method for making annual reductions to emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility allowance allocation that would mitigate the risk of leakage and ensure total no-cost allowances allocated to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities align with the annual allowance budgets established by the department under RCW 70A.65.070 and are consistent with the emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020, including the percentage reductions in emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility allowance allocation that would be applied each year from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050;
(ii) Proposed criteria and methods for the department to make adjustments to allowances allocated at no cost to emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facilities to address significant changes in leakage risk and to achieve the purposes of the greenhouse gas emissions cap and invest program established under this chapter including, but not limited to, the achievement of emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020;
(ii) Proposed criteria and methods to make adjustments to allowances allocated at no cost to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities to address significant changes in leakage risk and to achieve the purposes of the greenhouse gas emissions cap and invest program established under this chapter including, but not limited to, the achievement of emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020;
(iii) The proposed design of an allowance allocation policy or method that would require a portion of the allowances provided at no cost to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities to be consigned to auction and for the proceeds to be invested in projects or p.
(iii) The proposed design of an allowance allocation policy or method that would require a portion of the allowances provided at no cost to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities to be consigned to auction and for the proceeds to be invested in projects or programs for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facilities from which they were consigned, including the percentage of allowances to be consigned to auction and p.
6 SB 6246 programs for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facilities, including the percentage of allowances to be consigned to auction and proposed criteria and methods for the distribution and use of consigned funds at emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facilities;
6 ESB 6246 proposed criteria and methods for the distribution and use of consigned funds at each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility;
(iv) Additional state policies or strategies that may be necessary to support the reduction of emissions and decarbonization of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities in support of the achievement of emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020;
(iv) Additional state policies or strategies that may be necessary to support the reduction of emissions and decarbonization of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities in support of the achievement of emissions limits established in RCW 70A.45.020, including how to address technological and economic feasibility and infeasibility, and other barriers to implementation;
(ii) Potential for deployment of technologies and strategies for reducing emissions at emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities through 2050 and other facility-specific or industry-specific factors;
(ii) Potential for deployment of technologies and strategies for reducing emissions at emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities through 2050 and other facility-specific or industry-specific factors, including consideration of factors that may affect deployment of these technologies and strategies, such as technical and economic feasibility and infeasibility;
(c) If the legislature does not adopt a ((compliance obligation for)) schedule of allowances to be provided to facilities owned or operated by each covered entity designated as emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050, by December 1, 2027, those facilities must continue to receive allowances as provided in the years 2031 through 2034 until a schedule is adopted.
(c) In addition to these recommendations, the department may include information on additional state policies or strategies that incentivize emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities to use lower-carbon raw materials, recycled materials, or material substitution, to reduce the emissions attributable to the manufacture of an individual good or goods in the state.
(5) If the actual emissions of an emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facility exceed the facility's no cost allowances assigned for that compliance period, it must acquire additional compliance instruments such that the total compliance instruments transferred to its compliance account consistent with this chapter equals emissions p.
(d) If the legislature does not adopt a ((compliance obligation for)) schedule of allowances to be provided to facilities owned or operated by each covered entity designated as emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities ((by December 1, 2027)) from January 1, 2035, through January 1, 2050, those facilities must continue to p.
7 SB 6246 during the compliance period.
7 ESB 6246 receive allowances as provided in the years 2031 through 2034 until a schedule is adopted by the legislature.
(5) If the actual emissions of an emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facility exceed the facility's no cost allowances assigned for that compliance period, it must acquire additional compliance instruments such that the total compliance instruments transferred to its compliance account consistent with this chapter equals emissions during the compliance period.
In the event an entity curtails all production and becomes a curtailed facility, the allowances are retained but cannot be traded, sold, or transferred and are still subject to the emission reduction requirements specified in this section.
In the event an entity curtails all production and becomes a curtailed facility, the allowances are retained but cannot be traded, sold, or transferred and are still subject to the emissions reduction requirements specified in this section.
For a facility that is built on tribal lands or is determined by the department to impact tribal lands and resources, the protocols must be developed in consultation with the affected tribal nations.
For a facility that is built on p.
(9)(a) The purpose of the reporting and planning requirements of this subsection (9) is to establish a framework under which greenhouse gas emission reductions will begin to be achieved at each emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility.
8 ESB 6246 tribal lands or is determined by the department to impact tribal lands and resources, the protocols must be developed in consultation with the affected tribal nations.
It is not, however, the p.
(9)(a) The purpose of the reporting requirements of this subsection (9) is to establish a framework under which measures for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facilities in support of statewide emissions limits, including implementation barriers, can be identified, evaluated, and progressed.
8 SB 6246 intent of the legislature that the reporting and planning framework established in this section necessarily be fully implemented as a prerequisite to the legislature taking additional action addressing the allocation of no-cost allowances to emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facilities.
It is not, however, the intent of the legislature that the reporting framework established in this section require implementation of any specific emissions reduction measures identified, but to collect information that will inform the development and implementation of state policies and programs that directly support or enable emissions reduction activities by emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities.
The legislature intends, using the provisions of this subsection (9) as a starting point, to begin to establish a framework that will:
The legislature intends, using the provisions of this subsection (9) to establish a framework that will:
(i) Achieve emission reductions by emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facilities in a manner compatible with the overall allowance budgets established under this chapter and the statewide emission limits of chapter 70A.45 RCW;
(i) Achieve emissions reductions by emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facilities in a manner compatible with the overall allowance budgets established under this chapter and the statewide emissions limits of chapter 70A.45 RCW;
(ii) Provide appropriate financial incentives for early actions by owners and operators of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities;
and (ii) Inform the development and implementation of policies and programs, including financial incentives, to support and enable emissions reductions by owners and operators of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities, including when the department and other state agencies consider grant applications or award other funds deriving from revenues under this chapter.
and (iii) Consider such actions when the department considers grant applications or awards other funds deriving from revenues under this chapter.
(b) By December 1, 2028, and every four years thereafter, the owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility must provide the following to the department in a form and manner prescribed by the department through guidance or rule:
(b) To receive no-cost allowances associated with greenhouse gas emissions after January 1, 2027, the owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility must be in compliance with this subsection (9).
(i) Information about the greenhouse gas emissions of each emissions-intensive facility and, to the extent determined to be feasible for the facility by the department, each unit within each facility;
The owner or operator of an emissions- intensive, trade-exposed facility must provide the following to the department:
and (ii) An assessment of technically and economically feasible measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the facility.
(i) By March 31, 2028, and every two years thereafter, information about the greenhouse gas emissions of each emissions- intensive facility and, to the extent determined to be feasible for the facility by the department, each unit within each facility, including:
The assessment must:
(A) The products, and volumes of such products, produced by the facility;
(A) Include information identifying and estimating applicable potential emissions reduction projects in each facility using current p.
(B) A qualitative description of the sources of emissions from the facility;
9 ESB 6246 available technologies, or those that are likely to be available in the next 10 years, along with their implementation costs.
(C) A detailed analysis, supported by data, of the portion and percentage of the facility's emissions attributable to:
To the extent feasible, the information on applicable potential emissions reduction projects must include the:
(I) Emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion for purposes of producing low-temperature heat;
(I) Description of the project;
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Previous
Latest
(II) Emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion for purposes of producing medium-temperature heat;
(II) The project's ability to meet process specifications, permitting requirements, and low, medium, and high heat temperature ranges;
(III) Emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion for purposes of producing high-temperature heat;
(III) Estimated emissions reductions;
p.
(IV) Availability or maturation of technology;
9 SB 6246 (IV) Emissions associated with industrial processes at the facility involving chemical or physical transformations other than fuel combustion;
(V) Estimated capital expenditures;
(V) Emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion for purposes of on-site electrical generation;
(VI) Estimated annual operating expenditures;
(VI) Emissions associated with the consumption of electricity at the facility for electricity that was not generated on-site at the facility;
(VII) Cost-effectiveness;
and (VII) Other information adopted by the department by rule, or amended types of information specified in (b)(i)(C)(I) through (VI) of this subsection;
(VIII) Estimated implementation timeline;
(ii) By March 31, 2028, and every four years thereafter, a plan, following methods established by the department, that includes an assessment of potentially technically feasible or emerging technology options to reduce covered emissions from the facility.
and (IX) Project constraints including, but not limited to, electricity supply availability and permitting requirements;
The plan must include all greenhouse gas emission reduction measures that have the potential to result in greater than de minimis greenhouse gas emission reductions, be informed by a best available technology assessment, consider the opportunities associated with different temperature categories specified in (b)(i)(C) of this subsection (9), and be verified by an independent third party, and, at a minimum, include:
(B) Evaluate the potential for greenhouse gas emissions reductions including, but not limited to, by methods such as improved energy efficiency and energy conversion;
(A) The technical aspects of each option, including whether covered emission reductions or direct facility biomass emission reductions from the option would result from an increase in energy efficiency, the substitution of a fuel or energy source, or other changes to facility processes, chemistries, or material inputs;
and (C) Be reviewed by a licensed professional engineer who certifies that:
(B) A description of the expected greenhouse gas emission reductions that would be achieved by each option;
(I) The information submitted in this subsection (9)(b)(ii) is credible;
(C) A budget and estimated timeline to implement each option, if the owner or operator of the facility were to choose to move forward with the option;
and (II) The owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facility has undertaken a process to identify projects for greenhouse gas emissions reductions that are technically viable or that are likely to be technically viable in the next 10 years.
(D) Identification of options that would be complementary with other options included in the plan, and identification of options that could not be carried out in conjunction with other options;
(c) The owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facility may include in its assessment submitted under (b)(ii) of this subsection (9), alternative projects that:
(E) If applicable, a summary of any greenhouse gas emission reductions or greenhouse gas emission intensity reductions achieved through the implementation of options previously identified in a plan submitted under this section;
(i) Reduce emissions upstream or downstream of the facility;
and p.
(ii) Relate to raw material input;
10 SB 6246 (F) A plain language summary of proposed greenhouse gas emission reduction plans for the upcoming four-year period and to be achieved by 2050, and how existing and emerging technologies and copollutants were and will be considered in greenhouse gas emission reduction planning;
or (iii) Relate to cobenefits with other emissions reductions, including community or environmental benefits.
(iii) A description and data, submitted at the same time and covering the same time period as the report specified in (b)(i) of this subsection, documenting that the owner or operator of the facility has achieved tangible progress towards implementing best practices for energy efficiency, as determined by the department, at the facility.
(d) For the purpose of calculating emissions or submitting an assessment as provided in (b) of this subsection (9), the department must not require any new permanent submetering for greenhouse gas emissions sources.
(c) The provisions of RCW 70A.65.200(5) apply to the requirements of this subsection (9).
(e) The department must assess a penalty in accordance with RCW 70A.65.200(5) if an owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, p.
(d)(i) The owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade- exposed facility that submits information to the department under (b) of this subsection must structure each submission to include two self-contained parts:
10 ESB 6246 trade-exposed facility fails to comply with the requirements of this subsection (9).
(A) A report that contains no information that the owner or operator wishes to keep confidential;
and (B) A report that contains information that the owner or operator requests be made available only for the confidential use of the department, the director of the department, or the appropriate division of the department.
(ii) The director shall give consideration to a request by the owner or operator of an emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facility under (d)(i)(B) of this subsection, and if this action is not detrimental to the public interest and is otherwise within accord with the policies and purposes of chapter 43.21A RCW, the director of the department must grant the request for the information to remain confidential as authorized in RCW 43.21A.160.
Under the procedures established under RCW 43.21A.160, the director of the department must keep confidential any records furnished by a manufacturer under this chapter that relate to proprietary manufacturing processes.
(10) For purposes of subsection (9) of this section, the following temperature ranges apply, unless alternative temperature ranges are adopted by the department by rule:
(a) "Low-temperature heat" means temperatures of up to 130 degrees celsius;
(b) "Medium-temperature heat" means at least 130 degrees celsius and up to 400 degrees celsius;
and p.
11 SB 6246 (c) "High-temperature heat" means at least 400 degrees celsius or greater.
12 SB 6246
11 ESB 6246
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/11/2026.

  2. Chapter 253, 2026 Laws PV.

  3. Governor partially vetoed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 29; nays, 20; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 57; nays, 38; absent, 0; excused, 3.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  12. Committee amendment not adopted.

  13. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  14. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  15. Minority; without recommendation.

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Environment & Energy.

  18. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  19. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  20. Referred to Appropriations.

  21. Minority; do not pass.

  22. ENVI - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  23. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 4:00 PM.

  24. Public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 10:30 AM.

  25. First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.

  26. Third reading, passed; yeas, 27; nays, 22; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  27. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  28. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  29. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  30. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  31. Minority; do not pass.

  32. WM - Majority; do pass.

  33. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:30 AM.

  34. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  35. Referred to Ways & Means.

  36. Minority; do not pass.

  37. And refer to Ways & Means.

  38. ENET - Majority; do pass.

  39. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 1:30 PM.

  40. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 8:00 AM.

  41. First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 60 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 29 Yea · 20 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 29100
Republican 01900
Total 292000
% of votes cast 59%41%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Nay
Curtis King Republican Nay
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jeff Wilson Republican Nay
Jim McCune Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Leonard Christian Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Perry Dozier Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Ron Muzzall Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 57 Yea · 38 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 03602
Democrat 57201
Total 573803
% of votes cast 58%39%0%3%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Adam Bernbaum Democrat Yea
Adison Richards Democrat Yea
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Brianna Thomas Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Edwin Obras Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Janice Zahn Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Nay
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Lisa Parshley Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Nay
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Natasha Hill Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Osman Salahuddin Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shaun Scott Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Not Voting
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Zach Hall Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Nay
Andrew Barkis Republican Nay
Andrew Engell Republican Nay
April Connors Republican Nay
Brian Burnett Republican Nay
Carolyn Eslick Republican Not Voting
Chris Corry Republican Nay
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Nay
David Stuebe Republican Nay
Deb Manjarrez Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Nay
Ed Orcutt Republican Not Voting
Gloria Mendoza Republican Nay
Hunter Abell Republican Nay
Jenny Graham Republican Nay
Jeremie Dufault Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Joel McEntire Republican Nay
John Ley Republican Nay
Joshua Penner Republican Nay
Kevin Waters Republican Nay
Mark Klicker Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Matt Marshall Republican Nay
Michael Keaton Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Nay
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Peter Abbarno Republican Nay
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Sam Low Republican Nay
Skyler Rude Republican Nay
Stephanie Barnard Republican Nay
Stephanie McClintock Republican Nay
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Nay
Travis Couture Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 27 Yea · 22 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 27300
Republican 01900
Total 272200
% of votes cast 55%45%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Adrian Cortes Democrat Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Nay
Deborah Krishnadasan Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Nay
Curtis King Republican Nay
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jeff Wilson Republican Nay
Jim McCune Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Leonard Christian Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Nikki Torres Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Perry Dozier Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Ron Muzzall Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6246?
SB 6246 is sponsored by Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), and Vandana Slatter (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6246?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 6246?
Track SB 6246 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6246

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6246

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →