Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed House 39 D cosponsors

HB 2144 — Requiring notices to employees when electronic monitoring is used to assist employers conducting performance evaluations.

Last action — Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 15, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 39 sponsors

    1 primary, 38 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (39 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

166 added · 234 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to HB 2144 include a shift in focus from defining "artificial intelligence" in terms of its capability to perform tasks associated with human intelligence to emphasizing its role in generating outputs like predictions and decisions. Additionally, a new definition for "electronic monitoring" has been added, which includes various methods of tracking employee activities outside of direct observation. These changes are important because they clarify how artificial intelligence can influence workplace dynamics and outline the means by which employees may be monitored, ensuring that there are clear guidelines for both employers and employees regarding the use of these technologies.

→
Previous
Latest
H-3270.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2144 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Labor & Workplace Standards (originally sponsored by Representatives Parshley, Scott, Hill, Thomas, Reed, Berry, Duerr, Cortes, Peterson, Kloba, Donaghy, Macri, Bernbaum, Obras, Taylor, Fey, Fosse, Hall, Berg, Ramel, Wylie, Goodman, Stearns, Reeves, Pollet, Nance, Callan, Street, Ryu, Doglio, Simmons, Santos, Zahn, Bronoske, Stonier, Gregerson, Ormsby, Farivar, and Bergquist) READ FIRST TIME 01/30/26.
H-2432.2 HOUSE BILL 2144 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Representatives Parshley, Scott, Hill, Thomas, Reed, Berry, Duerr, Cortes, Peterson, Kloba, Donaghy, Macri, Bernbaum, Obras, Taylor, Fey, Fosse, Hall, Berg, Ramel, Wylie, Goodman, Stearns, Reeves, Pollet, Nance, Callan, Street, Ryu, Doglio, Simmons, Santos, Zahn, Bronoske, Stonier, Gregerson, Ormsby, Farivar, and Bergquist Prefiled 12/15/25.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards.
adding a new chapter to Title 49 RCW;
adding a new section to chapter 49.44 RCW;
prescribing penalties;
and prescribing penalties.
and providing an effective date.
The following definitions apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
A new section is added to chapter 49.44 RCW to read as follows:
(1) "Artificial intelligence" means an engineered or machine- based system that can, for a given set of objectives, generate outputs such as predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing real or virtual environments.
(1) The following definitions apply throughout this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
Artificial intelligence systems can be designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy.
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning and related technologies that use data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, translation, decision making, and content generation.
(2) "Department" means the department of labor and industries.
For the purposes of this subsection, "machine learning" means the process by which artificial intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw inferences thereupon to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy without explicit programming.
(3) "Director" means the director of the department of labor and industries or the director's designee.
(b) "Department" means the department of labor and industries.
(4) "Electronic monitoring" means the collection of information concerning an employee's activities or communications by any means other than direct, in-person observation, including, for example, through the use of artificial intelligence, a digital device, computer, telephone, wire, radio, camera, or electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
1 SHB 2144 (5) "Employee" means an individual employed by the employer whether by way of manual labor or otherwise.
1 HB 2144 (c) "Director" means the director of the department of labor and industries or the director's designee.
(6) "Employer" means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, business trust, legal representative, or other business entity that engages in any business, industry, profession, or activity in this state and employs one or more employees, and includes the state, any state institution, state agency, political subdivisions of the state, and any municipal corporation or quasi-municipal corporation.
(d) "Electronic monitoring" means the collection of information concerning an employee's activities or communications by any means other than direct, in-person observation, including, for example, through the use of artificial intelligence, a digital device, computer, telephone, wire, radio, camera, or electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
"Employer" does not include any general authority Washington law enforcement agency as defined in RCW 10.93.020 or any city, county, town, or state fire department responsible for fire suppression.
(e) "Employee" means an individual employed by the employer whether by way of manual labor or otherwise.
(7) "Meaningful human review" means a good-faith review by a supervisor, manager, or other authorized personnel who considers relevant electronic monitoring outputs, and as appropriate, other available information about the employee's performance, and has discretion to rely on, supplement, or depart from those outputs when conducting the performance evaluation.
(f) "Employer" means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, business trust, legal representative, or other business entity that engages in any business, industry, profession, or activity in this state and employs one or more employees, and includes the state, any state institution, state agency, political subdivisions of the state, and any municipal corporation or quasi-municipal corporation.
(8) "Performance evaluation" means an assessment, conducted by or on behalf of the employer, of an employee's execution of any aspect of the employee's job.
(g) "Performance evaluation" means an assessment, conducted by or on behalf of the employer, of an employee's execution of any aspect of the employee's job.
NEW SECTION.
(2)(a) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, if an employer intends to use electronic monitoring to assist the employer in conducting a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer must notify the employee in writing at least 30 days prior to implementing the use of electronic monitoring.
Sec.
(b) If, as of the effective date of this section, an employer is already using electronic monitoring to assist in a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer may continue to use electronic monitoring but must provide written notice to the employee within 60 days of the effective date of this section.
2.
(c) Beginning on the effective date of this section, when an employer hires an individual for employment and the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance evaluations, the employer must, at the time the job offer is made, provide written notice to the individual stating that the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance evaluations.
(1) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, if an employer intends to use electronic monitoring to assist the employer in conducting a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer must notify the employee, and the employee's exclusive bargaining representative if the employee is represented, in writing at least 30 days prior to implementing the use of electronic monitoring.
(d) The notice required under this section must include:
(2) If, as of the effective date of this section, an employer is already using electronic monitoring to assist in a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer may continue to use electronic monitoring but must provide written notice to the employee, and the employee's exclusive bargaining representative if the employee is represented, within 30 days of the effective date of this section.
(i) A summary of the ways electronic monitoring is or will be used to p.
(3) Beginning on the effective date of this section, when an employer hires an individual for employment and the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance p.
2 HB 2144 assist the employer with performance evaluations, such as whether electronic monitoring is used to gather an employee's productivity data, summarize internal data or feedback on an employee, or create a summary of an employee's performance;
2 SHB 2144 evaluations, the employer must, at the time the job offer is made, provide written notice to the individual stating that the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance evaluations.
and (ii) a summary of the verification process, if any, the employer uses to confirm data gathered by the electronic monitoring.
(4) This section does not prohibit an employer from implementing electronic monitoring of an employee prior to providing written notice to the employee, if:
(3)(a) If an employee files a complaint with the department alleging a violation of the requirements of this section, the department may investigate the complaint.
(a) The implementation of the use of technology is necessary to prevent imminent harm to an employee or any person;
or to prevent imminent theft, property damage, or other economic harm to the employer;
or to respond to an emergency event involving the employer or a state of emergency declared by a government body;
and (b) The employer notifies the employee in any manner as soon as practicable and subsequently follows up within 30 days of implementation, with a written notice that complies with the requirements in subsection (5) of this section.
(5) The notice required under this section must include:
(a) A statement that the employer uses technology to electronically monitor its employees.
If the employer is using computer monitoring software, key-stroke tracking technology, cameras or other video or photographic technology, audio recording or listening devices, artificial intelligence systems, or global positioning system or other positioning technology, for the primary purpose of monitoring the employee's job performance, the employer must include in the notice a general list of the type of technology being used.
The employer is not required to include in the notice a descriptive list of specific equipment, devices, or software being used;
and (b) A statement saying whether the employer has a verification process that includes meaningful human review to confirm information and data gathered by the electronic monitoring.
(6) The employer should take into account the employer's workforce and where feasible provide notices in the languages most commonly spoken by the employer's employees.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
(1) If an employee files a complaint with the department alleging a violation of the requirements of this section, the department may investigate the complaint.
p.
(b) The department may not investigate any complaint alleging a violation of this section that occurred more than three years before the date the employee filed the complaint.
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
Previous
Latest
3 SHB 2144 (2) The department may not investigate any complaint alleging a violation of this section that occurred more than three years before the date the employee filed the complaint.
(c) If the department finds that an employee's allegation cannot be substantiated, the department shall issue a closure letter to the employee and the employer detailing the department's finding.
(3) If the department finds that an employee's allegation cannot be substantiated, the department shall issue a closure letter to the employee and the employer detailing the department's finding.
(4)(a) If the department finds that the employer violated the requirements of this section, the department shall issue a citation and notice of assessment.
(4)(a) If the department finds that the employer violated the requirements of this section, the department shall issue a citation and notice of assessment, unless the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(b) The department's citation and notice of assessment must order the employer to immediately comply with the requirements of this section.
(b) The department's citation and notice of assessment must order the employer to comply with the requirements of section 2 of this act within 30 days of issuing the citation and notice of assessment.
If the department determines that the violation of this section was a willful violation, the department shall order the employer to pay the department a civil penalty of no less than $100 and no more than $5,000.
If the employer complies with the order within 30 days, the department may not impose any civil penalties.
If the employer fails to comply with the order within 30 days, the department may determine that the violation was a willful violation.
If the department determines that the violation of this section was a willful violation, the department shall order the employer to pay the department a civil penalty of no less than $100 and no more than $5,000, unless the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(5) The department may issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses or parties and the production of documents, administer oaths and examine witnesses under oath, take depositions, and seek affidavits or other verifications.
p.
The department may request an employer to perform a self-audit of any records, which must be p.
3 HB 2144 (5) The department may issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses or parties and the production of documents, administer oaths and examine witnesses under oath, take depositions, and seek affidavits or other verifications.
4 SHB 2144 provided within a reasonable time as specified in the self-audit request.
The department may request an employer to perform a self-audit of any records, which must be provided within a reasonable time as specified in the self-audit request.
NEW SECTION.
p.
Sec.
4 HB 2144 (8)(a) In addition to the administrative remedy provided under this section, an employee may bring a civil action against an employer for a violation of this section.
4.
(1) An employer may not retaliate, discharge, or otherwise take adverse action against an employee because the employee has filed a complaint, or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under this chapter, or has testified p.
5 SHB 2144 or is about to testify in any such proceeding, or because of the exercise by the employee of any right afforded by this chapter.
(2)(a) An employee aggrieved by an employer violating subsection (1) of this section, may file a complaint with the department within 180 days of the alleged retaliation.
(b) The department shall investigate and issue either a citation and notice of assessment or a determination of compliance within 90 days after the date the department receives the complaint, unless the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(3) If the department's investigation finds that the employer retaliated against the employee, and the complaint is not otherwise resolved, the department may notify the employer that the department intends to issue a citation and notice of assessment, and may provide up to 30 days after the date of the notification for the employer to take corrective action to remedy the retaliatory action.
If the complaint is not otherwise resolved, the department shall issue a citation and notice of assessment and may impose civil penalties and other appropriate relief.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
5.
Nothing in this chapter supersedes or diminishes the requirements, rights, and responsibilities under chapter 9.73 RCW.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
6.
An employer must maintain and keep records of the notices given to its employees and must provide records to the department upon request.
The employer shall keep and maintain records for at least three years.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
(1) In addition to the administrative remedy provided under section 3 of this act, an employee may bring a civil action against an employer for a violation of this section.
The court may also order actual damages, reinstatement, p.
The court may also order actual damages, reinstatement, injunctive relief, and other appropriate remedies for an employee injured by a violation of this section.
6 SHB 2144 injunctive relief, and other appropriate remedies for an employee injured by a violation of this section.
(b) The employee must bring a civil action within three years of the date of the alleged violation of this section regardless of whether the employee pursued an administrative complaint.
(2) The employee must bring a civil action within three years of the date of the alleged violation of this section regardless of whether the employee pursued an administrative complaint.
(9) The department may adopt rules to implement this section.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
8.
The department may adopt rules to implement this section.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
9.
This act takes effect July 1, 2028.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
10.
Sections 1 through 9 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 49 RCW.
7 SHB 2144
5 HB 2144
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.

  2. Referred to Appropriations.

  3. Minority; do not pass.

  4. LAWS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  5. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.

  6. Public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.

  7. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

  8. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (38)

Not signed on (112)

112 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 112 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2144?
HB 2144 is sponsored by Steve Bergquist (Democrat), Darya Farivar (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat), Dan Bronoske (Democrat), Janice Zahn (Democrat), Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Chipalo Street (Democrat), Lisa Callan (Democrat), Greg Nance (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Kristine Reeves (Democrat), Chris Stearns (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Sharon Wylie (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), April Berg (Democrat), Zach Hall (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Jake Fey (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), Edwin Obras (Democrat), Adam Bernbaum (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Brandy Donaghy (Democrat), Shelley Kloba (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Davina Duerr (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Brianna Thomas (Democrat), Natasha Hill (Democrat), Shaun Scott (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), and Julio Cortes (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 2144?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 15, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 2144?
Track HB 2144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2144

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2144

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →