HB 2144 — Requiring notices to employees when electronic monitoring is used to assist employers conducting performance evaluations.
Last action — Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 15, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
39 sponsors
1 primary, 38 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (39 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
166 added · 234 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to HB 2144 include a shift in focus from defining "artificial intelligence" in terms of its capability to perform tasks associated with human intelligence to emphasizing its role in generating outputs like predictions and decisions. Additionally, a new definition for "electronic monitoring" has been added, which includes various methods of tracking employee activities outside of direct observation. These changes are important because they clarify how artificial intelligence can influence workplace dynamics and outline the means by which employees may be monitored, ensuring that there are clear guidelines for both employers and employees regarding the use of these technologies.
H-3270.1H-2432.2 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2144 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Labor & Workplace Standards (originally sponsored by Representatives Parshley, Scott, Hill, Thomas, Reed, Berry, Duerr, Cortes, Peterson, Kloba, Donaghy, Macri, Bernbaum, Obras, Taylor, Fey, Fosse, Hall, Berg, Ramel, Wylie, Goodman, Stearns, Reeves, Pollet, Nance, Callan, Street, Ryu, Doglio, Simmons, Santos, Zahn, Bronoske, Stonier, Gregerson, Ormsby, Farivar, and Bergquist)Bergquist READPrefiled FIRST12/15/25. TIME 01/30/26.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards.
adding a new chaptersection to Titlechapter 4949.44 RCW;
and prescribing penalties;penalties.
and providing an effective date.
TheA followingnew definitionssection applyis throughoutadded thisto chapter unless49.44 theRCW contextto clearlyread requiresas otherwise:follows:
(1) "ArtificialThe intelligence"following meansdefinitions anapply engineeredthroughout orthis machine-section, basedunless systemthe thatcontext can,clearly forrequires aotherwise: given set of objectives, generate outputs such as predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing real or virtual environments.
Artificial(a) intelligence"Artificial systemsintelligence" canmeans bethe designeduse of machine learning and related technologies that use data to operatetrain withstatistical varyingmodels levelsfor the purpose of autonomy.enabling computer systems to perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language processing, translation, decision making, and content generation.
(2)For "Department"the purposes of this subsection, "machine learning" means the departmentprocess ofby laborwhich artificial intelligence is developed using data and industries.algorithms to draw inferences thereupon to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy without explicit programming.
(3)(b) "Director""Department" means the director of the department of labor and industriesindustries. or the director's designee.
(4) "Electronic monitoring" means the collection of information concerning an employee's activities or communications by any means other than direct, in-person observation, including, for example, through the use of artificial intelligence, a digital device, computer, telephone, wire, radio, camera, or electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
1 SHBHB 2144 (5)(c) "Employee""Director" means anthe individualdirector employedof by the employerdepartment whetherof bylabor wayand ofindustries manualor laborthe ordirector's otherwise.designee.
(6)(d) "Employer""Electronic monitoring" means anythe person,collection firm,of corporation,information partnership,concerning businessan trust,employee's legalactivities representative, or othercommunications businessby entity that engages in any business,means industry,other profession,than ordirect, activityin-person inobservation, thisincluding, statefor andexample, employsthrough one or more employees, and includes the state,use anyof stateartificial institution,intelligence, statea agency,digital politicaldevice, subdivisionscomputer, oftelephone, thewire, state,radio, andcamera, anyor municipalelectromagnetic, corporationphotoelectronic, or quasi-municipalphoto-optical corporation.system.
"Employer"(e) does"Employee" notmeans includean anyindividual generalemployed authorityby Washingtonthe lawemployer enforcementwhether agencyby asway definedof inmanual RCWlabor 10.93.020 or anyotherwise. city, county, town, or state fire department responsible for fire suppression.
(7)(f) "Meaningful"Employer" humanmeans review"any meansperson, afirm, good-faithcorporation, reviewpartnership, bybusiness atrust, supervisor,legal manager,representative, or other authorizedbusiness personnelentity whothat considersengages relevantin electronicany monitoringbusiness, outputs,industry, andprofession, asor appropriate,activity otherin availablethis informationstate aboutand theemploys employee'sone performance,or andmore hasemployees, discretionand toincludes relythe on,state, supplement,any orstate departinstitution, fromstate thoseagency, outputspolitical whensubdivisions conductingof the performancestate, evaluation.and any municipal corporation or quasi-municipal corporation.
(8)(g) "Performance evaluation" means an assessment, conducted by or on behalf of the employer, of an employee's execution of any aspect of the employee's job.
NEW(2)(a) SECTION.Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, if an employer intends to use electronic monitoring to assist the employer in conducting a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer must notify the employee in writing at least 30 days prior to implementing the use of electronic monitoring.
Sec.(b) If, as of the effective date of this section, an employer is already using electronic monitoring to assist in a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer may continue to use electronic monitoring but must provide written notice to the employee within 60 days of the effective date of this section.
2.(c) Beginning on the effective date of this section, when an employer hires an individual for employment and the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance evaluations, the employer must, at the time the job offer is made, provide written notice to the individual stating that the employer uses or intends to use electronic monitoring to assist in performance evaluations.
(1)(d) ExceptThe asnotice providedrequired inunder subsections (3) and (4) of this section,section if an employer intends to use electronic monitoring to assist the employer in conducting a performance evaluation of an employee, the employer must notifyinclude: the employee, and the employee's exclusive bargaining representative if the employee is represented, in writing at least 30 days prior to implementing the use of electronic monitoring.
(2)(i) If,A assummary of the effectiveways date of this section, an employer is already using electronic monitoring tois assistor inwill abe performanceused evaluation of an employee, the employer may continue to usep. electronic monitoring but must provide written notice to the employee, and the employee's exclusive bargaining representative if the employee is represented, within 30 days of the effective date of this section.
(3)2 BeginningHB on2144 assist the effectiveemployer datewith ofperformance thisevaluations, section,such whenas anwhether employerelectronic hiresmonitoring anis individualused forto employmentgather andan theemployee's employerproductivity usesdata, summarize internal data or intendsfeedback toon usean electronicemployee, monitoringor tocreate assista insummary performanceof p.an employee's performance;
2and SHB(ii) 2144a evaluations,summary theof employer must, at the timeverification theprocess, jobif offerany, is made, provide written notice to the individual stating that the employer uses or intends to useconfirm electronicdata monitoringgathered toby assistthe inelectronic performancemonitoring. evaluations.
(4)(3)(a) ThisIf sectionan doesemployee notfiles prohibita ancomplaint employerwith fromthe implementingdepartment electronicalleging monitoringa violation of anthe employeerequirements priorof tothis providingsection, writtenthe noticedepartment tomay investigate the employee,complaint. if:
(a) The implementation of the use of technology is necessary to prevent imminent harm to an employee or any person;
or to prevent imminent theft, property damage, or other economic harm to the employer;
or to respond to an emergency event involving the employer or a state of emergency declared by a government body;
and (b) The employer notifies the employee in any manner as soon as practicable and subsequently follows up within 30 days of implementation, with a written notice that complies with the requirements in subsection (5) of this section.
(5) The notice required under this section must include:
(a) A statement that the employer uses technology to electronically monitor its employees.
If the employer is using computer monitoring software, key-stroke tracking technology, cameras or other video or photographic technology, audio recording or listening devices, artificial intelligence systems, or global positioning system or other positioning technology, for the primary purpose of monitoring the employee's job performance, the employer must include in the notice a general list of the type of technology being used.
The employer is not required to include in the notice a descriptive list of specific equipment, devices, or software being used;
and (b) A statement saying whether the employer has a verification process that includes meaningful human review to confirm information and data gathered by the electronic monitoring.
(6) The employer should take into account the employer's workforce and where feasible provide notices in the languages most commonly spoken by the employer's employees.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
(1) If an employee files a complaint with the department alleging a violation of the requirements of this section, the department may investigate the complaint.
p.(b) The department may not investigate any complaint alleging a violation of this section that occurred more than three years before the date the employee filed the complaint.
Show all 88 changed lines (48 more)
3(c) SHBIf 2144the (2) The department mayfinds notthat investigatean anyemployee's complaintallegation allegingcannot abe violationsubstantiated, ofthe thisdepartment sectionshall thatissue occurreda moreclosure thanletter threeto years before the dateemployee and the employeeemployer fileddetailing the complaint.department's finding.
(3)(4)(a) If the department finds that anthe employee'semployer allegationviolated cannotthe berequirements substantiated,of this section, the department shall issue a closurecitation letter to the employee and thenotice employerof detailingassessment. the department's finding.
(4)(a)(b) IfThe thedepartment's departmentcitation findsand thatnotice the employer violated the requirements of thisassessment section,must order the departmentemployer shallto issueimmediately acomply citationwith andthe noticerequirements of assessment,this unlesssection. the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(b)If Thethe department'sdepartment citationdetermines andthat noticethe violation of assessmentthis mustsection orderwas thea employerwillful toviolation, complythe withdepartment theshall requirementsorder ofthe sectionemployer 2to ofpay thisthe actdepartment withina 30civil dayspenalty of issuingno theless citationthan $100 and noticeno ofmore assessment.than $5,000.
If the employer complies with the order within 30 days, the department may not impose any civil penalties.
If the employer fails to comply with the order within 30 days, the department may determine that the violation was a willful violation.
If the department determines that the violation of this section was a willful violation, the department shall order the employer to pay the department a civil penalty of no less than $100 and no more than $5,000, unless the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(5)p. The department may issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses or parties and the production of documents, administer oaths and examine witnesses under oath, take depositions, and seek affidavits or other verifications.
3 HB 2144 (5) The department may requestissue ansubpoenas employer to performcompel athe self-auditattendance of anywitnesses records,or whichparties mustand bethe p.production of documents, administer oaths and examine witnesses under oath, take depositions, and seek affidavits or other verifications.
4The SHBdepartment 2144may request an employer to perform a self-audit of any records, which must be provided within a reasonable time as specified in the self-audit request.
NEWp. SECTION.
Sec.4 HB 2144 (8)(a) In addition to the administrative remedy provided under this section, an employee may bring a civil action against an employer for a violation of this section.
4.
(1) An employer may not retaliate, discharge, or otherwise take adverse action against an employee because the employee has filed a complaint, or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under this chapter, or has testified p.
5 SHB 2144 or is about to testify in any such proceeding, or because of the exercise by the employee of any right afforded by this chapter.
(2)(a) An employee aggrieved by an employer violating subsection (1) of this section, may file a complaint with the department within 180 days of the alleged retaliation.
(b) The department shall investigate and issue either a citation and notice of assessment or a determination of compliance within 90 days after the date the department receives the complaint, unless the complaint is otherwise resolved.
(3) If the department's investigation finds that the employer retaliated against the employee, and the complaint is not otherwise resolved, the department may notify the employer that the department intends to issue a citation and notice of assessment, and may provide up to 30 days after the date of the notification for the employer to take corrective action to remedy the retaliatory action.
If the complaint is not otherwise resolved, the department shall issue a citation and notice of assessment and may impose civil penalties and other appropriate relief.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
5.
Nothing in this chapter supersedes or diminishes the requirements, rights, and responsibilities under chapter 9.73 RCW.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
6.
An employer must maintain and keep records of the notices given to its employees and must provide records to the department upon request.
The employer shall keep and maintain records for at least three years.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
(1) In addition to the administrative remedy provided under section 3 of this act, an employee may bring a civil action against an employer for a violation of this section.
The court may also order actual damages, reinstatement, p.injunctive relief, and other appropriate remedies for an employee injured by a violation of this section.
6(b) SHBThe 2144employee injunctivemust relief,bring anda othercivil appropriateaction remedieswithin forthree anyears employeeof injuredthe bydate aof the alleged violation of this section.section regardless of whether the employee pursued an administrative complaint.
(2)(9) The employeedepartment mustmay bringadopt arules civilto actionimplement within three years of the date of the alleged violation of this sectionsection. regardless of whether the employee pursued an administrative complaint.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
8.
The department may adopt rules to implement this section.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
9.
This act takes effect July 1, 2028.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
10.
Sections 1 through 9 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 49 RCW.
75 SHBHB 2144
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:30 AM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAWS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Steve Bergquist · Cosponsor
- Darya Farivar · Cosponsor
- Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
- Mia Gregerson · Cosponsor
- Monica Jurado Stonier · Cosponsor
- Dan Bronoske · Cosponsor
- Janice Zahn · Cosponsor
- Sharon Tomiko Santos · Cosponsor
- Tarra Simmons · Cosponsor
- Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
- Chipalo Street · Cosponsor
- Lisa Callan · Cosponsor
- Greg Nance · Cosponsor
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Kristine Reeves · Cosponsor
- Chris Stearns · Cosponsor
- Roger Goodman · Cosponsor
- Sharon Wylie · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- April Berg · Cosponsor
- Zach Hall · Cosponsor
- Mary Fosse · Cosponsor
- Jake Fey · Cosponsor
- Jamila Taylor · Cosponsor
- Edwin Obras · Cosponsor
- Adam Bernbaum · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Brandy Donaghy · Cosponsor
- Shelley Kloba · Cosponsor
- Strom Peterson · Cosponsor
- Davina Duerr · Cosponsor
- Liz Berry · Cosponsor
- Julia Reed · Cosponsor
- Brianna Thomas · Cosponsor
- Natasha Hill · Cosponsor
- Shaun Scott · Cosponsor
- Lisa Parshley · Primary
- Julio Cortes · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lisa Parshley Democrat
Co-sponsors (38)
- Steve Bergquist Democrat
- Darya Farivar Democrat
- Timm Ormsby Democrat
- Mia Gregerson Democrat
- Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat
- Dan Bronoske Democrat
- Janice Zahn Democrat
- Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat
- Tarra Simmons Democrat
- Beth Doglio Democrat
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
- Chipalo Street Democrat
- Lisa Callan Democrat
- Greg Nance Democrat
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Kristine Reeves Democrat
- Chris Stearns Democrat
- Roger Goodman Democrat
- Sharon Wylie Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
- April Berg Democrat
- Zach Hall Democrat
- Mary Fosse Democrat
- Jake Fey Democrat
- Jamila Taylor Democrat
- Edwin Obras Democrat
- Adam Bernbaum Democrat
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Brandy Donaghy Democrat
- Shelley Kloba Democrat
- Strom Peterson Democrat
- Davina Duerr Democrat
- Liz Berry Democrat
- Julia Reed Democrat
- Brianna Thomas Democrat
- Natasha Hill Democrat
- Shaun Scott Democrat
- Julio Cortes Democrat
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2144?
- HB 2144 is sponsored by Steve Bergquist (Democrat), Darya Farivar (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat), Dan Bronoske (Democrat), Janice Zahn (Democrat), Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Chipalo Street (Democrat), Lisa Callan (Democrat), Greg Nance (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Kristine Reeves (Democrat), Chris Stearns (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Sharon Wylie (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), April Berg (Democrat), Zach Hall (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Jake Fey (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), Edwin Obras (Democrat), Adam Bernbaum (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Brandy Donaghy (Democrat), Shelley Kloba (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Davina Duerr (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Brianna Thomas (Democrat), Natasha Hill (Democrat), Shaun Scott (Democrat), Lisa Parshley (Democrat), and Julio Cortes (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2144?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 15, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 2144?
- Track HB 2144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2144
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2144
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →