California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 624 — Accessible state technology.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Technology, within the Government Operations Agency, headed by the Director of Technology, who is also known as the State Chief Information Officer. The department is responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects by, among other things, consulting with agencies during initial project planning to ensure that project proposals are based on well-defined programmatic needs and consider feasible alternatives to address the identified needs and benefits consistent with statewide strategies, policies, and procedures. This bill would establish, in the Government Operations Agency within the Department of Technology, the Office of Accessible Technology to monitor and facilitate compliance of state electronic and information technology with the requirements of certain state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology. This bill would require the office to be headed by a Chief of the Office of Accessible Technology who is required to, among other things, audit compliance of state electronic and information technology with the requirements of state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology, train chief information officers in other state agencies and entities, and manage complaints from state employees and members of the public relating to the accessibility of technology. This bill would also require the chief to post the results of all audits on the office's Internet Web site. This bill would make these provisions operative only upon the Legislature making an appropriation to implement them. (2) Existing law requires each state agency and each state entity, as those terms are defined, to have a chief information officer with specified duties relating to information technology. This bill would specifically include ensuring compliance with state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology among the duties of those chief information officers.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. May 28 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  3. Set for hearing May 28.

  4. May 26 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  5. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  6. Set for hearing May 26.

  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 973.) (May 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. Set for hearing May 12.

  9. Joint Rule 61(a)(2) suspended. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 844.)

  10. April 28 hearing postponed by committee.

  11. Set for hearing April 28.

  12. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  13. Read first time.

  14. From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.

  15. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Anderson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Anderson

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 624 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Technology, within the Government Operations Agency, headed by the Director of Technology, who is also known as the State Chief Information Officer. The department is responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects by, among other things, consulting with agencies during initial project planning to ensure that project proposals are based on well-defined programmatic needs and consider feasible alternatives to address the identified needs and benefits consistent with statewide strategies, policies, and procedures. This bill would establish, in the Government Operations Agency within the Department of Technology, the Office of Accessible Technology to monitor and facilitate compliance of state electronic and information technology with the requirements of certain state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology. This bill would require the office to be headed by a Chief of the Office of Accessible Technology who is required to, among other things, audit compliance of state electronic and information technology with the requirements of state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology, train chief information officers in other state agencies and entities, and manage complaints from state employees and members of the public relating to the accessibility of technology. This bill would also require the chief to post the results of all audits on the office's Internet Web site. This bill would make these provisions operative only upon the Legislature making an appropriation to implement them. (2) Existing law requires each state agency and each state entity, as those terms are defined, to have a chief information officer with specified duties relating to information technology. This bill would specifically include ensuring compliance with state and federal laws relating to the accessibility of technology among the duties of those chief information officers.
Who sponsors SB 624?
SB 624 is sponsored by Anderson.
What is the current status of SB 624?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 624?
Track SB 624 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 624

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 624

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →