Civil law: litigation: The Civility in Litigation Act.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1256 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1256.
You're tracking SB 1256
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1256 — Civil law: litigation: The Civility in Litigation Act.
Last action — May 3 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 4. Page 3767.) Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law states the time and procedure for commencement of civil actions. This bill would require a person who claims to have been aggrieved by an alleged unlawful act or practice, to send a letter to the person or entity he or she alleges to have caused the harm that sets forth alleged facts in support of the grievance and any other information necessary to inform the person or entity of the alleged harm suffered, prior to filing any legal action or pursuing legally mandated alternative dispute resolution, as specified. The bill would require the person who claims to have been aggrieved to engage with that person or entity in good faith efforts to be made whole, if, during the 30-day period following the date on which the letter was received there is a response from the person or entity that is alleged to have engaged in the unlawful act or practice. The bill would toll the statute of limitations on a claim arising from the alleged unlawful act or practice for the 30-day period, including the following period of negotiations, if any. If, after that 30-day period there is no response, the bill would authorize the person who claims to have been aggrieved to pursue other efforts to be made whole, including filing a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction or alternative dispute resolution. The bill would require that if the person who claims to have been aggrieved files a complaint in a court of law, he or she shall describe in the complaint the good faith efforts he or she made to comply with these provisions or attach a copy of the letter sent pursuant to this section and proof of its mailing to the complaint. The bill would also authorize a court, factfinder, or arbiter, if it determines that these provisions were not complied with in good faith, to dismiss a claim that is otherwise authorized, in which case it would be required to state in writing and with specificity why the case was dismissed, and whether or not the case is dismissed with or without prejudice.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced Current pdf February 18, 2016
- SB1256 View text html
Action History
-
May 3 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 4. Page 3767.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Anderson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Anderson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 57% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1256 do?
- Existing law states the time and procedure for commencement of civil actions. This bill would require a person who claims to have been aggrieved by an alleged unlawful act or practice, to send a letter to the person or entity he or she alleges to have caused the harm that sets forth alleged facts in support of the grievance and any other information necessary to inform the person or entity of the alleged harm suffered, prior to filing any legal action or pursuing legally mandated alternative dispute resolution, as specified. The bill would require the person who claims to have been aggrieved to engage with that person or entity in good faith efforts to be made whole, if, during the 30-day period following the date on which the letter was received there is a response from the person or entity that is alleged to have engaged in the unlawful act or practice. The bill would toll the statute of limitations on a claim arising from the alleged unlawful act or practice for the 30-day period, including the following period of negotiations, if any. If, after that 30-day period there is no response, the bill would authorize the person who claims to have been aggrieved to pursue other efforts to be made whole, including filing a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction or alternative dispute resolution. The bill would require that if the person who claims to have been aggrieved files a complaint in a court of law, he or she shall describe in the complaint the good faith efforts he or she made to comply with these provisions or attach a copy of the letter sent pursuant to this section and proof of its mailing to the complaint. The bill would also authorize a court, factfinder, or arbiter, if it determines that these provisions were not complied with in good faith, to dismiss a claim that is otherwise authorized, in which case it would be required to state in writing and with specificity why the case was dismissed, and whether or not the case is dismissed with or without prejudice.
- Who sponsors SB 1256?
- SB 1256 is sponsored by Anderson.
- What is the current status of SB 1256?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1256?
- Track SB 1256 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1256
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1256
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →