AB 1569 — California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: existing transportation infrastructure.
Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would exempt from the provisions of CEQA a project, or the issuance of a permit for a project, that consists of the inspection, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, replacement, or removal of, or the addition of an auxiliary lane or bikeway to, existing transportation infrastructure and that meets certain requirements. The bill would require the public agency carrying out the project to take certain actions.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/28/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 28, 2016
- Introduced 01/04/16 - Introduced pdf January 04, 2016
- AB1569 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Anderson · Cosponsor
- Baker · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Bigelow · Cosponsor
- Brough · Cosponsor
- Cannella · Cosponsor
- Chang · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Hadley · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Kim · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Linder · Cosponsor
- Mayes · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Obernolte · Cosponsor
- Olsen · Cosponsor
- Steinorth · Primary
- Vidak · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
- Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 21 co-sponsors · 100 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Steinorth
Co-sponsors (21)
- Anderson
- Baker
- Bates
- Bigelow
- Brough
- Cannella
- Chang
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Hadley
- Huff
- Kim
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Linder
- Mayes
- Mathis
- Obernolte
- Olsen
- Vidak
- Patterson, Joe Republican
- Bill Berryhill
- Travis Allen
Not signed on (100)
100 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 100 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 56% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1569 do?
- The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would exempt from the provisions of CEQA a project, or the issuance of a permit for a project, that consists of the inspection, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, replacement, or removal of, or the addition of an auxiliary lane or bikeway to, existing transportation infrastructure and that meets certain requirements. The bill would require the public agency carrying out the project to take certain actions.
- Who sponsors AB 1569?
- AB 1569 is sponsored by Anderson, Baker, Bates, Bigelow, Brough, Cannella, Chang, Gallagher, James (Republican), Hadley, Huff, Kim, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Linder, Mayes, Mathis, Obernolte, Olsen, Steinorth, Vidak, Patterson, Joe (Republican), Bill Berryhill, and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 1569?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1569?
- Track AB 1569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1569
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1569
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →