AB 2757 — Agricultural workers: wages, hours, and working conditions.
Last action — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 38. Noes 35. Page 5218.).
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law sets wage, hour, meal break requirements, and other working conditions for employees and requires an employer to pay overtime wages as specified to an employee who works in excess of a workday or workweek, as defined, and imposes criminal penalties for the violation of these requirements. Existing law exempts agricultural employees from these requirements. Under existing law, the function of the Department of Industrial Relations is to, among other things, foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment. This bill would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, as defined, over the course of 4 years, from 2019 to 2022, inclusive. Beginning January 1, 2022, the bill would require any work performed by a person, employed in an agricultural occupation, in excess of 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee's regular rate of pay. The bill would authorize the Governor to delay the implementation of these overtime pay provisions if the Governor also suspends the implementation of a scheduled state minimum wage increase, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Industrial Relations to update a specified wage order for consistency with these provisions. The bill would create a state-mandated local program by including agricultural employees as a class of employees protected by criminal penalties under existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/02/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 02, 2016
- Amended 06/01/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 01, 2016
- Amended 03/30/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 30, 2016
- Introduced 02/19/16 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2016
- AB2757 View text html
Action History
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 38. Noes 35. Page 5218.).
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 45. Noes 28. Page 5207.)
-
Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 5207.)
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 5166.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Block · Cosponsor
- Burke · Cosponsor
- Campos · Cosponsor
- Lopez · Cosponsor
- Mitchell · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Chu · Cosponsor
- Mike A. Gipson · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Hall · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Lara · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Liu · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Medina · Cosponsor
- Santiago · Cosponsor
- Thurmond · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Jeff Gonzalez · Primary
- Lisa Calderon · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
- Roger Hernández · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 26 co-sponsors · 95 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gonzalez, Jeff Republican
Co-sponsors (26)
- Beall
- Block
- Burke
- Campos
- Lopez
- Mitchell
- Chiu
- Chu
- Gipson, Mike A. Democratic
- Hancock
- Hall
- Jones-Sawyer
- Lara
- Leno
- Liu
- McCarty
- Medina
- Santiago
- Thurmond
- Ting
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
- Travis Allen Voted No
- Mark Stone
- Roger Hernández
Not signed on (95)
95 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 95 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 30 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 35 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 48% | 44% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 23 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 45 | 28 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 35% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2757 do?
- Existing law sets wage, hour, meal break requirements, and other working conditions for employees and requires an employer to pay overtime wages as specified to an employee who works in excess of a workday or workweek, as defined, and imposes criminal penalties for the violation of these requirements. Existing law exempts agricultural employees from these requirements. Under existing law, the function of the Department of Industrial Relations is to, among other things, foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment. This bill would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, as defined, over the course of 4 years, from 2019 to 2022, inclusive. Beginning January 1, 2022, the bill would require any work performed by a person, employed in an agricultural occupation, in excess of 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee's regular rate of pay. The bill would authorize the Governor to delay the implementation of these overtime pay provisions if the Governor also suspends the implementation of a scheduled state minimum wage increase, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Industrial Relations to update a specified wage order for consistency with these provisions. The bill would create a state-mandated local program by including agricultural employees as a class of employees protected by criminal penalties under existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2757?
- AB 2757 is sponsored by Beall, Block, Burke, Campos, Lopez, Mitchell, Chiu, Chu, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Hancock, Hall, Jones-Sawyer, Lara, Leno, Liu, McCarty, Medina, Santiago, Thurmond, Ting, Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Garcia, Robert (Democratic), Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Travis Allen, Mark Stone, and Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 2757?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2757?
- Track AB 2757 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2757
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2757
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →