California State University: student success fees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2210 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2210.
You're tracking AB 2210
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2210 — California State University: student success fees.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the trustees by rule to require all persons to pay fees, rents, deposits, and charges for services, facilities, or materials provided by the trustees to those persons. Existing law prohibits specified California State University campus-based mandatory fees from being reallocated without an affirmative vote of the majority of the members of either the student body or a specified campus fee advisory committee voting on the fee reallocation, unless the vote that established the fee authorizes an alternative or automatic reallocation mechanism for that fee. Existing law prohibits a campus of the California State University, or the Chancellor of the California State University, from imposing a student success fee, as defined, unless certain requirements are met. Among these requirements is an affirmative vote of a majority of the student body voting at a binding student election. This bill would increase the affirmative vote required for the imposition of a student success fee from a majority to 23 of the student body voting on that proposed fee. The bill would also make a technical conforming change in a related provision.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/17/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 17, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2210 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Brough · Cosponsor
- Runner · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Harper · Primary
- Olsen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Harper
Co-sponsors (5)
- Bates
- Brough
- Runner
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Olsen
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 31% | 54% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2210 do?
- Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the trustees by rule to require all persons to pay fees, rents, deposits, and charges for services, facilities, or materials provided by the trustees to those persons. Existing law prohibits specified California State University campus-based mandatory fees from being reallocated without an affirmative vote of the majority of the members of either the student body or a specified campus fee advisory committee voting on the fee reallocation, unless the vote that established the fee authorizes an alternative or automatic reallocation mechanism for that fee. Existing law prohibits a campus of the California State University, or the Chancellor of the California State University, from imposing a student success fee, as defined, unless certain requirements are met. Among these requirements is an affirmative vote of a majority of the student body voting at a binding student election. This bill would increase the affirmative vote required for the imposition of a student success fee from a majority to 23 of the student body voting on that proposed fee. The bill would also make a technical conforming change in a related provision.
- Who sponsors AB 2210?
- AB 2210 is sponsored by Bates, Brough, Runner, Gallagher, James (Republican), Harper, and Olsen.
- What is the current status of AB 2210?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2210?
- Track AB 2210 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2210
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2210
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →